Cited by 13Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

A Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial (SMART) study of medication and CBT sequencing in the treatment of pediatric anxiety disorders

Open access
Peterson, Bradley S., West, Amy E., Weisz, John R., Mack, Wendy J., Kipke, Michele D., Findling, Robert L., Mittman, Brian S., Bansal, Ravi +13 more·2021·BMC Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: Treatment of a child who has an anxiety disorder usually begins with the question of which treatment to start first, medication or psychotherapy. Both have strong empirical support, but few studies have compared their effectiveness head-to-head, and none has investigated what to do if the treatment tried first isn’t working well—whether to optimize the treatment already begun or to add the other treatment. Methods: This is a single-blind Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial (SMART) of 24 weeks duration with two levels of randomization, one in each of two 12-week stages. In Stage 1, children will be randomized to fluoxetine or Coping Cat Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT). In Stage 2, remitters will continue maintenance-level therapy with the single-modality treatment received in Stage 1. Non-remitters during the first 12 weeks of treatment will be randomized to either [1] optimization of their Stage 1 treatment, or [2] optimization of Stage 1 treatment and addition of the other intervention. After the 24-week trial, we will follow participants during open, naturalistic treatment to assess the durability of study treatment effects. Patients, 8–17 years of age who are diagnosed with an anxiety disorder, will be recruited and treated within 9 large clinical sites throughout greater Los Angeles. They will be predominantly underserved, ethnic minorities. The primary outcome measure will be the self-report score on the 41-item youth SCARED (Screen for Child Anxiety Related Disorders). An intent-to-treat analysis will compare youth randomized to fluoxetine first versus those randomized to CBT first (“Main Effect 1”). Then, among Stage 1 non-remitters, we will compare non-remitters randomized to optimization of their Stage 1 monotherapy versus non-remitters randomized to combination treatment (“Main Effect 2”). The interaction of these main effects will assess whether one of the 4 treatment sequences (CBT➔CBT; CBT➔med; med➔med; med➔CBT) in non-remitters is significantly better or worse than predicted from main effects alone. Discussion: Findings from this SMART study will identify treatment sequences that optimize outcomes in ethnically diverse pediatric patients from underserved low- and middle-income households who have anxiety disorders. Trial registration: This protocol, version 1.0, was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov on February 17, 2021 with Identifier:NCT04760275.

Verified 2026-11-06 · 1 reference not checked yet

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This paper is the published protocol for a single-blind, 24-week Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial (SMART) comparing fluoxetine-first versus Coping Cat CBT-first treatment for pediatric anxiety disorders, with a second randomization for non-remitters. It reports the design, rationale, measures, and power calculations only; no trial outcomes are presented.

Key findings

  • No outcome results are reported; this is a protocol (version 1.0, registered ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04760275 on February 17, 2021).
  • Planned enrollment is 404 children ages 8–17 with a DSM-5 anxiety disorder, randomized 1:1 in Stage 1 to fluoxetine or Coping Cat CBT for 12 weeks; Stage 1 non-remitters are re-randomized 1:1 to optimization of Stage 1 monotherapy versus optimization plus addition of the other modality.
  • Power calculations: a Main Effect 2 effect size of approximately 0.40 SD requires 194 Stage 1 non-remitters; inflating for a 40% Stage 1 remission rate and 20% dropout yields N = 404 (202 per group), providing 80% power to detect a Main Effect 1 effect size of ≥0.31 SD.
  • Remission is defined as (a) youth SCARED-41 below diagnostic threshold for any single anxiety disorder, (b) total youth SCARED-41 < 10, and (c) CAIS score ≤8; relapse during the trial is defined as SCARED total ≥25 at week 18.

Methods

  • Design: single-blind SMART with two sequential 1:1 randomizations, one per 12-week stage, stratified by study site, age group, and baseline symptom severity (SCARED-41 ≤33 vs >33), with blocked allocation via REDCap; a non-randomized treatment-as-usual cohort will also be followed.
  • Sample and setting: 404 children ages 8–17 with a diagnosed anxiety disorder (generalized anxiety, separation anxiety, social anxiety, or panic disorder on K-SADS-COMP), recruited across 9 clinical sites in greater Los Angeles serving predominantly underserved, ethnic-minority, low- and middle-income families; English- or Spanish-speaking.
  • Primary outcome and analysis: youth self-report SCARED-41 at week 24, analyzed intent-to-treat using general linear models/ANCOVA with stratification factors and baseline youth SCARED as covariates; Main Effect 1 (medication-first vs CBT-first), Main Effect 2 (among non-remitters, optimize monotherapy vs add the other modality), and their interaction testing the 4 treatment sequences, with inverse-probability weighting (2 for remitters, 4 for non-remitters) and sandwich-based robust standard errors.

Limitations

  • The paper states no formal limitations section (it is a protocol). Limitations evident in the text: patients and clinicians cannot be blinded to treatment assignment because PCORI guidelines preclude paying for clinical care, so the trial is only "single blind" (assessments are self- or parent-report); no interim analyses are planned; and no independent audits are planned.
  • The text states that youth in foster care are excluded because enrollment is not feasible, and that inclusion requires fluency in English or Spanish, which the authors estimate excludes only ~0.3% of families at their sites.
  • The non-randomized treatment-as-usual comparison group is self-selected (patients who decline randomization), which the text does not frame as a limitation but which limits causal comparison against usual care.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12888-021-03314-y

Cites

199 of 200 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

38 of 215 cited sources checked · 16 supported · 1 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    Ethnic minorities demonstrated poorer adherence to CBT in the CAMS trial.

    “Ethnic minorities also demonstrated poorer adherence to CBT in the CAMS trial [41, 124], and these youth will be strongly represented in our study population.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [41] Gordon-Hollingsworth AT, Becker EM, Ginsburg GS, Keeton C, Compton SN, Birmaher BB, et al. Anxiety disorders in Caucasian and African American children: a comparison of clinical characteristics, treatment process variables, and treatment outcomes. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2015;46(5):643–55. source

      The Results (Treatment Process Variables; page not available) report that African American youth in CAMS attended fewer CBT sessions and were rated by therapists as less compliant than Caucasian youth. The claim broadens this finding to ethnic minorities generally, although this paper compared only African American and Caucasian youth; the compliance difference was also no longer significant after adjustment for socioeconomic status and living situation. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [124] Lee P, Zehgeer A, Ginsburg GS, McCracken J, Keeton C, Kendall PC, et al. Child and adolescent adherence with cognitive behavioral therapy for anxiety: predictors and associations with outcomes. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2019;48(sup1):S215–S26. source

      In Results > Predictors of Adherence (page not supplied), the CAMS analysis states that neither race nor ethnicity predicted CBT adherence. The paper hypothesized a minority-status association and discusses an earlier study, but its own findings do not show poorer adherence among ethnic-minority youth. (LLM, conf=0.90)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    Individual differences in treatment response likely derive from patient-specific biological, sociological, psychological, historical, and contextual determinants of responses to threat.

    “Individual differences in treatment response likely derive from patient-specific biological, sociological, psychological, historical, and contextual determinants of responses to threat [61].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [61] Ozomaro U, Wahlestedt C, Nemeroff CB. Personalized medicine in psychiatry: problems and promises. BMC Med. 2013;11(1):132. source

      The treatment-response section reports that genetic differences can affect antidepressant response, while the environmental-stress section describes interactions between genetics, childhood trauma, and stress responses (page numbers unavailable). The paper does not establish that sociological, psychological, historical, and contextual determinants of responses to threat account for individual differences in treatment response. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Interpretationcitation

    Findings of the sequential randomization aspect of the SMART design during treatment can inform clinician decisions about treatment sequencing based on the individual patient's response to the intervention currently in use.

    “Findings of the sequential randomization aspect of the SMART design during treatment can inform clinician decisions about treatment sequencing based on the individual patient’s response to the intervention currently in use, further supporting personalized treatment [53, 54].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [53] Lei H, Nahum-Shani I, Lynch K, Oslin D, Murphy SA. A "SMART" design for building individualized treatment sequences. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2012;8:21–48. source
    • cites [54] Almirall D, Nahum-Shani I, Sherwood NE, Murphy SA. Introduction to SMART designs for the development of adaptive interventions: with application to weight loss research. Transl Behav Med. 2014;4(3):260–74. source
  • Interpretationreasoning

    SMART designs are ideal for developing an adaptive intervention that optimizes outcomes based on patient treatment history.

    “making them ideal for developing an adaptive intervention that optimizes outcomes based on patient treatment history [51–54].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [51] Murphy SA. An experimental design for the development of adaptive treatment strategies. Stat Med. 2005;24(10):1455–81. source

      Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.

    • cites [52] Ogbagaber SB, Karp J, Wahed AS. Design of sequentially randomized trials for testing adaptive treatment strategies. Stat Med. 2016;35(6):840–58. source

      Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.

    • cites [53] Lei H, Nahum-Shani I, Lynch K, Oslin D, Murphy SA. A "SMART" design for building individualized treatment sequences. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2012;8:21–48. source
    • cites [54] Almirall D, Nahum-Shani I, Sherwood NE, Murphy SA. Introduction to SMART designs for the development of adaptive interventions: with application to weight loss research. Transl Behav Med. 2014;4(3):260–74. source
  • Premisecitation

    There is an absence of data indicating whether sequencing of treatment impacts treatment satisfaction, well-being, peer relationships, parent and family functioning, school functioning, or comorbid psychiatric symptoms.

    “Complicating the selection of initial treatment is the absence of data indicating whether sequencing of treatment impacts treatment satisfaction, well-being, peer relationships, parent and family functioning, school functioning, or comorbid psychiatric symptoms [5, 42–44].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [5] Kendall PC, Safford S, Flannery-Schroeder E, Webb A. Child anxiety treatment: outcomes in adolescence and impact on substance use and depression at 7.4-year follow-up. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2004;72(2):276–87. source
    • cites [42] Piacentini J, Bennett S, Compton SN, Kendall PC, Birmaher B, Albano AM, et al. 24- and 36-week outcomes for the child/adolescent anxiety multimodal study (CAMS). J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2014;53(3):297–310. source

      The Discussion (page unavailable) says the study could not directly assess the potential benefits of additional treatments received during follow-up, which supports a narrower data gap. It does not establish an absence of data on treatment sequencing or its effects on the specific satisfaction, relationship, family, school, and comorbidity outcomes listed in the claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [43] Barrett PM, Duffy AL, Dadds MR, Rapee RM. Cognitive-behavioral treatment of anxiety disorders in children: long-term (6-year) follow-up. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2001;69(1):135–41. source
    • cites [44] National Institute for Health and Care Excellence: Clinical Guidelines. Social Anxiety Disorder: Recognition, Assessment and Treatment. Leicester (UK) 2013.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 76
  • May combine two claims. 77
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Tolerance of exposure, with inhibition of an associated avoidance response, is considered the key element in cognitive behavioral therapy of anxiety disorders.

    “Tolerance of exposure, with inhibition of an associated avoidance response, is considered the key element in the cognitive behavioral therapy of anxiety disorders [77, 78].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [77] Weisman JS, Rodebaugh TL. Exposure therapy augmentation: a review and extension of techniques informed by an inhibitory learning approach. Clin Psychol Rev. 2018;59:41–51. source
    • cites [78] Craske MG, Treanor M, Conway CC, Zbozinek T, Vervliet B. Maximizing exposure therapy: an inhibitory learning approach. Behav Res Ther. 2014;58:10–23. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Evidence suggests that CBT or medication can modify the cascade of responses to real or perceived threat - CBT by altering behavioral avoidance and information processing related to threat detection and coping, and medication by altering neurotransmitter levels that affect the function and structure of brain circuits.

    “Evidence suggests that CBT or medication can modify the cascade of responses to real or perceived threat – CBT by altering behavioral avoidance and information processing related to threat detection and coping [56, 57], and medication by altering neurotransmitter levels that affect the function and structure of brain circuits [58–60].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 5 sources checked
    • cites [56] Siegel P, Warren R, Wang Z, Yang J, Cohen D, Anderson JF, et al. Less is more: neural activity during very brief and clearly visible exposure to phobic stimuli. Hum Brain Mapp. 2017;38(5):2466–81. source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [57] Siegel P, Wang Z, Murray L, Campos J, Sims V, Leighton E, et al. Brain-based mediation of non-conscious reduction of phobic avoidance in young women during functional MRI: a randomised controlled experiment. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020;7(11):971–81. source
    • cites [58] Craske MG, Stein MB. Anxiety. Lancet. 2016;388(10063):3048–59. source
    • cites [59] Bansal R, Hellerstein DJ, Peterson BS. Evidence for neuroplastic compensation in the cerebral cortex of persons with depressive illness. Mol Psychiatry. 2018;23(2):375–83. source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [60] Posner J, Hellerstein DJ, Gat I, Mechling A, Klahr K, Wang Z, et al. Antidepressants normalize the default mode network in patients with dysthymia. JAMA psychiatry. 2013;70(4):373–82. source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In the CAMS trial comparing CBT to medication, the patient sample was 78% Caucasian and 75% middle or upper class.

    “In the CAMS trial comparing CBT to medication, for example, the patient sample was 78% Caucasian and 75% middle or upper class [10].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [10] Kendall PC, Compton SN, Walkup JT, Birmaher B, Albano AM, Sherrill J, et al. Clinical characteristics of anxiety disordered youth. J Anxiety Disord. 2010;24(3):360–5. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Guidelines often recommend CBT as the first-line treatment, but without evidence that it yields better patient outcomes than beginning with medication.

    “They often recommend CBT as the first-line treatment, but without evidence that it yields better patient outcomes than beginning with medication [44–46].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [44] National Institute for Health and Care Excellence: Clinical Guidelines. Social Anxiety Disorder: Recognition, Assessment and Treatment. Leicester (UK) 2013.

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [45] Connolly SD, Bernstein GA. Work group on quality I. practice parameter for the assessment and treatment of children and adolescents with anxiety disorders. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2007;46(2):267–83. source
    • cites [46] Anxiety and Depression in Children and Youth – Diagnosis and Treatment. Guidelines & Protocols Advisory Committee, British Columbia Medical Services Commission. 2010.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    SSRI treatment effects begin to emerge within 2 weeks, sooner with higher doses.

    “SSRI treatment effects begin to emerge within 2 weeks, sooner with higher doses [21]”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [21] Strawn JR, Mills JA, Sauley BA, Welge JA. The Impact of Antidepressant Dose and Class on Treatment Response in Pediatric Anxiety Disorders: A Meta-Analysis. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2018;57(4):235–44.e2. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Both time spent in exposure tasks and level of difficulty of the exposures tolerated predicted better outcomes to Coping Cat within the CAMS sample.

    “Of note, both time spent in exposure tasks, and level of difficulty of the exposures tolerated, predicted better outcomes to Coping Cat within the CAMS sample [119].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [119] Peris TS, Caporino NE, O’Rourke S, Kendall PC, Walkup JT, Albano AM, et al. Therapist-reported features of exposure tasks that predict differential treatment outcomes for youth with anxiety. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2017;56(12):1043–52. source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductcitation

    Randomization will be stratified by study site, age group [8-17], and baseline symptom severity, dichotomizing SCARED-41 scores as ≤33 or >33 based on the median SCARED-41 score for participants having scores ≥25 in the CAMS and LAMS studies.

    “Randomization will be stratified by study site, age group [8–17], and baseline symptom severity (dichotomizing SCARED-41 scores as ≤33 or > 33, based on the median SCARED-41 score for participants having scores ≥25 in the CAMS [49] and LAMS [163] studies).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [49] Walkup JT, Albano AM, Piacentini J, Birmaher B, Compton SN, Sherrill JT, et al. Cognitive behavioral therapy, sertraline, or a combination in childhood anxiety. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(26):2753–66. source

      The Methods (Randomization and Masking; page unavailable) identify this as a randomized childhood-anxiety study, supporting its identification as the CAMS study. The paper reports stratification by age, sex, and study center, but does not report a median SCARED-41 score of 33 among participants scoring at least 25; its Outcome Assessments section instead describes the Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale. Thus it does not substantiate the cutoff attributed to CAMS. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [163] Van Meter AR, You DS, Halverson T, Youngstrom EA, Birmaher B, Fristad MA, et al. Diagnostic Efficiency of Caregiver Report on the SCARED for Identifying Youth Anxiety Disorders in Outpatient Settings. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2018;47(sup1):S161–s75. source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    CAMS found large effect sizes for combined medication+CBT compared to monotherapy, with a somewhat larger difference compared to CBT alone than medication alone.

    “However, CAMS did find large ESs for combined medication+CBT compared to monotherapy, with a somewhat larger difference compared to CBT alone than medication alone.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [42] Piacentini J, Bennett S, Compton SN, Kendall PC, Birmaher B, Albano AM, et al. 24- and 36-week outcomes for the child/adolescent anxiety multimodal study (CAMS). J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2014;53(3):297–310. source

      The Results (Outcomes at Weeks 24 and 36; page unavailable) report that combined treatment outperformed both CBT and sertraline alone. They describe the effect sizes as generally moderate at week 24 (0.51–0.81) and small at week 36 (0.34–0.41), not broadly large. The passage does not establish a larger effect relative to CBT than relative to medication. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In CAMS, the CBT maintenance protocol was designed to reflect how the treatment would be delivered in clinical settings over an extended care time frame and focused on exposure practice and coping skills review, without the addition of other new material.

    “In CAMS, this was “designed to reflect how the … treatment would be delivered in clinical settings” over an extended care time frame and focused on exposure practice and coping skills review, without the addition of other new material [49].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [49] Walkup JT, Albano AM, Piacentini J, Birmaher B, Compton SN, Sherrill JT, et al. Cognitive behavioral therapy, sertraline, or a combination in childhood anxiety. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(26):2753–66. source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Previous findings suggest that disadvantaged youth may have lower engagement in key tasks of CBT and may have less mastery of material, leading to poorer outcomes.

    “Third and finally, our focus on practice and intensity was informed by previous findings suggesting that disadvantaged youth may have lower engagement in key tasks of CBT and may have less mastery of material, leading to poorer outcomes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [41] Gordon-Hollingsworth AT, Becker EM, Ginsburg GS, Keeton C, Compton SN, Birmaher BB, et al. Anxiety disorders in Caucasian and African American children: a comparison of clinical characteristics, treatment process variables, and treatment outcomes. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2015;46(5):643–55. source

      The Results (Treatment Process Variables) report lower therapist-rated involvement, compliance, and CBT-content mastery among African American youth than Caucasian youth; after adjustment for SES and home living situation, the differences in involvement and compliance were no longer significant. The Results (Treatment Outcome Variables) link greater involvement, mastery, and compliance to higher odds of remission. The claim extends these findings in clinically anxious African American youth to disadvantaged youth generally. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [124] Lee P, Zehgeer A, Ginsburg GS, McCracken J, Keeton C, Kendall PC, et al. Child and adolescent adherence with cognitive behavioral therapy for anxiety: predictors and associations with outcomes. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2019;48(sup1):S215–S26. source

      The Results (Predictors of Adherence; page unavailable) report that youth from higher-SES families attended more CBT sessions, while the Discussion (Youth Adherence and Treatment Outcomes; page unavailable) links therapist-rated compliance with better outcomes. The paper does not establish that disadvantaged youth engage less in key CBT tasks or master less material; SES predicted attendance, not task compliance or mastery. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Patient non-adherence (poor attendance, low homework completion, poor compliance in session) was associated with number of parents present in the home (with best outcomes for two-parent families), although indices of non-adherence varied in their power to predict clinical outcomes.

    “Similarly, patient non-adherence (poor attendance, low homework completion, poor compliance in session) was associated with number of parents present in the home (with the best outcomes for two-parent families), although indices of non-adherence varied in their power to predict clinical outcomes [124].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [124] Lee P, Zehgeer A, Ginsburg GS, McCracken J, Keeton C, Kendall PC, et al. Child and adolescent adherence with cognitive behavioral therapy for anxiety: predictors and associations with outcomes. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2019;48(sup1):S215–S26. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Coping Cat training has demonstrated effectiveness with clinicians ranging from graduate students to experienced psychotherapists, with strong treatment effects in each case.

    “Coping Cat training has demonstrated effectiveness with clinicians ranging from graduate students [180, 181] to experienced psychotherapists [49], with strong treatment effects in each case.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [180] Kendall PC. Treating anxiety disorders in children: results of a randomized clinical trial. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1994;62(1):100–10. source
    • cites [181] Kendall PC, Flannery-Schroeder E, Panichelli-Mindel SM, Southam-Gerow M, Henin A, Warman M. Therapy for youths with anxiety disorders: a second randomized clinical trial. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1997;65(3):366–80. source
    • cites [49] Walkup JT, Albano AM, Piacentini J, Birmaher B, Compton SN, Sherrill JT, et al. Cognitive behavioral therapy, sertraline, or a combination in childhood anxiety. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(26):2753–66. source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Non-responders in the treatment arms were referred to community providers for general outpatient treatment, and non-responders to the placebo condition were offered their choice of active study interventions.

    “Non-responders in the treatment arms were referred to community providers for general outpatient treatment, and non-responders to the placebo condition were offered their choice of active study interventions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [42] Piacentini J, Bennett S, Compton SN, Kendall PC, Birmaher B, Albano AM, et al. 24- and 36-week outcomes for the child/adolescent anxiety multimodal study (CAMS). J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2014;53(3):297–310. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Latent class/profile analysis has been proposed as an alternative to subgroup analysis in clinical trials, using observed data to identify latent group classifications that may suggest individual characteristics related to greater responses to treatment.

    “Latent class/profile analysis has been proposed as an alternative to subgroup analysis in clinical trials. As an exploratory analysis, it uses observed data (e.g., clinical characteristics, randomized treatments) to identify latent group classifications that may suggest individual characteristics related to greater responses to treatment [205].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [205] Lanza ST, Rhoades BL. Latent class analysis: an alternative perspective on subgroup analysis in prevention and treatment. Prev Sci. 2013;14(2):157–68. source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Q-learning is a regression approach recommended for SMART data to identify tailoring variables that modify treatment responses and suggest enhancements to sequential decision-making of an adaptive intervention.

    “This is a regression approach recommended for SMART data to identify tailoring variables that modify treatment responses and suggest enhancements to the sequential decision-making of an adaptive intervention [197].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [197] Nahum-Shani I, Qian M, Almirall D, Pelham WE, Gnagy B, Fabiano GA, et al. Q-learning: a data analysis method for constructing adaptive interventions. Psychol Methods. 2012;17(4):478–94. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Teenagers desired outcomes including feeling comfortable around peers, feeling confident in the classroom, feeling less worried about things outside their control, and being better able to manage emotions.

    “Desired outcomes for teenagers included feeling comfortable around peers, feeling confident in the classroom, feeling less worried about things outside their control, and being better able to manage emotions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingown data

    Parents in community engagement reported that shame/stigma creates a significant barrier to accessing treatment services for youth with a mental health condition.

    “Parents discussed the shame that youth with a mental health condition feel, the secrecy they keep, and how this shame/stigma creates a significant barrier to accessing treatment services.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Parents voiced desired outcomes including their child sleeping through the night, managing change without anger or panic attacks, interacting positively with peers and teachers, and attending school more consistently without emotional outbursts.

    “Parents voiced wanting their child to be able to sleep through the night, manage change without anger or panic attacks, interact positively with peers and teachers, and attend school more consistently and without emotional outbursts.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    Following Research 101, parents demonstrated increased knowledge about research, study methods, and designs.

    “Following Research 101, parents demonstrated increased knowledge about research, study methods, and designs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Parents have many fears and misperceptions about research and the intentions of researchers.

    “In general, we heard that parents have many fears and misperceptions about research and the intentions of researchers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingreasoning

    Extensive discussions with leaders of the pediatric primary care network suggested that once-daily dosing, the wide range of safe doses, and simple upward titration in 10 mg increments will facilitate the training and comfort of pediatricians in prescribing medication in this study.

    “Finally, extensive discussions with leaders of our pediatric primary care network have suggested that the once-daily dosing, the wide range of doses over which fluoxetine administration is deemed safe in pediatric patients, and the simple upward titration in 10 mg increments will facilitate the training and comfort of pediatricians in prescribing medication in this study.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Parents expressed concern about randomization as potentially "unfair" if treatment is withheld.

    “Parents also expressed concern about randomization as potentially “unfair” if treatment is withheld.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The total number of patients seen in the age range across the 9 sites is >300,761 annually (601,522 over 2 years of recruitment), and 2.9% of them already carry a diagnosis of anxiety disorder in their electronic medical record.

    “The total number of patients seen in our age range across these 9 sites is > 300,761 annually (601,522 over 2 years of recruitment), and 2.9% of them already carry a diagnosis of anxiety disorder in their electronic medical record.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Early intervention may reduce anxiety prevalence in adults, attenuate the frequent worsening of symptoms, and lessen the associated impairment over time.

    “suggesting that early intervention may reduce anxiety prevalence in adults, attenuate the frequent worsening of symptoms and lessen the associated impairment over time [1, 5, 6].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [1] Copeland WE, Angold A, Shanahan L, Costello EJ. Longitudinal patterns of anxiety from childhood to adulthood: the Great Smoky Mountains study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2014;53(1):21–33. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [5] Kendall PC, Safford S, Flannery-Schroeder E, Webb A. Child anxiety treatment: outcomes in adolescence and impact on substance use and depression at 7.4-year follow-up. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2004;72(2):276–87. source
    • cites [6] Patel V, Flisher AJ, Hetrick S, McGorry P. Mental health of young people: a global public-health challenge. Lancet. 2007;369(9569):1302–13. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Pediatric anxiety disorders are chronic, recurrent, and unstable in diagnostic classification over time, with new anxiety disorders appearing together with or replacing the initial primary diagnosis.

    “Systematic reviews and meta-analyses have consistently shown that pediatric anxiety disorders, like their adult counterparts, are chronic, recurrent, and unstable in their diagnostic classification over time”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [16] Scholten WD, Batelaan NM, Penninx BWJH, Balkom AJLMv, Smit JH, Schoevers RA, et al. Diagnostic instability of recurrence and the impact on recurrence rates in depressive and anxiety disorders. J Affect Disord. 2016;195:185–90. source
    • cites [17] Hovenkamp-Hermelink JHM, Riese H, van der Veen DC, Batelaan NM, Penninx BWJH, Schoevers RA. Low stability of diagnostic classifications of anxiety disorders over time: a six-year follow-up of the NESDA study. J Affect Disord. 2016;190:310–5. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Systematic reviews and meta-analyses have documented substantial therapeutic effects for psychotherapy, particularly CBT, and medication, especially SSRIs.

    “Systematic reviews and meta-analyses have also documented substantial therapeutic effects for both psychotherapy, particularly CBT (Cognitive Behavioral Therapy) [18, 19], and medication, especially SSRIs (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors) [20–22].”
    • Also stated in: § Conceptual framework of the SMART design · boosted
      “though substantial evidence supports the effectiveness of both SSRI’s and CBT in treating pediatric anxiety”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 5 sources checked
    • cites [18] Weisz JR, Kuppens S, Ng MY, Eckshtain D, Ugueto AM, Vaughn-Coaxum R, et al. What five decades of research tells us about the effects of youth psychological therapy: a multilevel meta-analysis and implications for science and practice. Am Psychol. 2017;72(2):79–117. source
    • cites [19] Higa-McMillan CK, Francis SE, Rith-Najarian L, Chorpita BF. Evidence base update: 50 years of research on treatment for child and adolescent anxiety. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2016;45(2):91–113. source
    • cites [20] Wang Z, Whiteside S, Sim L, Farah W, Morrow A, Alsawas M, et al. Anxiety in children. Comparative effectiveness. AHRQ comparative effectiveness reviews. Review no. 192 (prepared by the Mayo Clinic evidence-based practice center under contract no. 290–2015-00013-I.) ed. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2017. source

      Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.

    • cites [21] Strawn JR, Mills JA, Sauley BA, Welge JA. The Impact of Antidepressant Dose and Class on Treatment Response in Pediatric Anxiety Disorders: A Meta-Analysis. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2018;57(4):235–44.e2. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [22] Dobson ET, Bloch MH, Strawn JR. Efficacy and Tolerability of Pharmacotherapy for Pediatric Anxiety Disorders: A Network Meta-Analysis. J Clin Psychiatry. 2019;80(1):e1-e14. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Long-term outcomes in pediatric anxiety are poor and relapses are common, similar to adult anxiety disorders where relapse approaches 60%.

    “Long-term follow-up in pediatric studies is rare, but data suggest that outcomes are poor and relapses common, similar to what is observed in adult anxiety disorders, where relapse approaches 60% [16, 28].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [16] Scholten WD, Batelaan NM, Penninx BWJH, Balkom AJLMv, Smit JH, Schoevers RA, et al. Diagnostic instability of recurrence and the impact on recurrence rates in depressive and anxiety disorders. J Affect Disord. 2016;195:185–90. source
    • cites [28] Scholten WD, Batelaan NM, van Balkom AJLM. Wjh. Penninx B, Smit JH, van Oppen P. recurrence of anxiety disorders and its predictors. J Affect Disord. 2013;147(1):180–5. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Ethnic minorities tend to view CBT as less feasible for their lifestyle, thereby limiting their treatment adherence.

    “but they also tend to view CBT as less feasible for their lifestyle [40], thereby limiting their treatment adherence [41].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [40] Chavira DA, Stein MB, Bailey K, Stein MT. Parental opinions regarding treatment for social anxiety disorder in youth. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2003;24(5):315–22. source
    • cites [41] Gordon-Hollingsworth AT, Becker EM, Ginsburg GS, Keeton C, Compton SN, Birmaher BB, et al. Anxiety disorders in Caucasian and African American children: a comparison of clinical characteristics, treatment process variables, and treatment outcomes. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2015;46(5):643–55. source

      Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Predictors of poor acute treatment outcomes include more severe symptoms, more functional impairment, low socioeconomic status, and a primary diagnosis of social phobia.

    “Predictors of poor acute treatment outcomes include more severe symptoms, more functional impairment [29, 31], low socioeconomic status (SES) [32], and a primary diagnosis of social phobia [31, 32].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [29] Ginsburg GS, Becker-Haimes EM, Keeton C, Kendall PC, Iyengar S, Sakolsky D, et al. Results from the child/adolescent anxiety multimodal extended long-term study (CAMELS): primary anxiety outcomes. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2018;57(7):471–80. source
    • cites [31] Wergeland GJH, Fjermestad KW, Marin CE, Bjelland I, Haugland BSM, Silverman WK, et al. Predictors of treatment outcome in an effectiveness trial of cognitive behavioral therapy for children with anxiety disorders. Behav Res Ther. 2016;76:1–12. source
    • cites [32] Kodal A, Fjermestad KW, Bjelland I, Gjestad R, Öst L-G, Bjaastad JF, et al. Predictors of long-term outcome of CBT for youth with anxiety disorders treated in community clinics. J Anxiety Disorder. 2018;59:53–63. source

      Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Consensus panels generally agree that CBT and either SSRI or SNRI pharmacotherapies have the strongest evidence for efficacy.

    “They generally agree that CBT and either SSRI or SNRI pharmacotherapies have the strongest evidence for efficacy [20].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [20] Wang Z, Whiteside S, Sim L, Farah W, Morrow A, Alsawas M, et al. Anxiety in children. Comparative effectiveness. AHRQ comparative effectiveness reviews. Review no. 192 (prepared by the Mayo Clinic evidence-based practice center under contract no. 290–2015-00013-I.) ed. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2017. source

      Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The CAMS study compared CBT and medication but was an efficacy study conducted in academic centers rather than real-world community clinics.

    “(the CAMS study did, but it was an efficacy study conducted in academic centers rather than in “real world” community clinics [10]).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [10] Kendall PC, Compton SN, Walkup JT, Birmaher B, Albano AM, Sherrill J, et al. Clinical characteristics of anxiety disordered youth. J Anxiety Disord. 2010;24(3):360–5. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Findings on the association of baseline individual tailoring and environmental variables with later clinical outcomes can inform the use of individual patient information for initial treatment assignment.

    “Findings on the association of baseline individual tailoring and environmental variables with later clinical outcomes can inform the use of individual patient information for initial treatment assignment.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Therapeutic alliance provides expectancy and hope for change and fosters fortitude to confront problems through treatment.

    “It provides expectancy and hope for change and fosters the fortitude to confront the problems through treatment [80–83].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [80] Zilcha-Mano S, Roose SP, Brown PJ, Rutherford BR. Not Just Nonspecific Factors: The Roles of Alliance and Expectancy in Treatment, and Their Neurobiological Underpinnings. Front Behav Neurosci. 2019;12:293. source

      Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.

    • cites [81] Zilcha-Mano S, Brown PJ, Roose SP, Cappetta K, Rutherford BR. Optimizing patient expectancy in the pharmacologic treatment of major depressive disorder. Psychol Med. 2019;49(14):2414-20. source
    • cites [82] Rutherford BR, Wall MM, Brown PJ, Choo T-H, Wager TD, Peterson BS, et al. Patient expectancy as a mediator of placebo effects in antidepressant clinical trials. Am J Psychiatr. 2017;174(2):135–42. source

      Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.

    • cites [83] Zilcha-Mano S, Wang Z, Peterson BS, Wall MM, Chen Y, Wager TD, et al. Neural mechanisms of expectancy-based placebo effects in antidepressant clinical trials. J Psychiatr Res. 2019;116:19–25. source

      Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Neither SSRI nor CBT works well for all youth.

    “neither treatment works well for all youth”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In the CAMS study, combined CBT + sertraline improved clinical response more than either modality alone, but primarily in those with severe anxiety, and not in long-term follow-up.

    “In the CAMS study, combined CBT + sertraline improved clinical response more than either modality alone [49], but primarily in those with severe anxiety [50], and not in long-term follow-up [29].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [49] Walkup JT, Albano AM, Piacentini J, Birmaher B, Compton SN, Sherrill JT, et al. Cognitive behavioral therapy, sertraline, or a combination in childhood anxiety. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(26):2753–66. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [50] Taylor JH, Lebowitz ER, Jakubovski E, Coughlin CG, Silverman WK, Bloch MH. Monotherapy insufficient in severe anxiety? Predictors and moderators in the child/adolescent anxiety multimodal study. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2018;47(2):266-81. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [29] Ginsburg GS, Becker-Haimes EM, Keeton C, Kendall PC, Iyengar S, Sakolsky D, et al. Results from the child/adolescent anxiety multimodal extended long-term study (CAMELS): primary anxiety outcomes. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2018;57(7):471–80. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationcitation

    Empirical evidence contributing to individualized treatment regimens based on tailoring variables, treatment history, and current response status will have the added advantage of supporting shared decision-making by the child and parents with an empirically-informed clinician.

    “Empirical evidence contributing to individualized treatment regimens based on tailoring variables, treatment history, and current response status will have the added advantage of supporting shared decision-making by the child and parents with an empirically-informed clinician [65, 66]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [65] Drake RE, Cimpean D, Torrey WC. Shared decision making in mental health: prospects for personalized medicine. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2009;11(4):455–63. source

      Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.

    • cites [66] Legare F, Witteman HO. Shared decision making: examining key elements and barriers to adoption into routine clinical practice. Health Aff. 2013;32(2):276–84. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Because adaptive approaches approximate intervention sequences used in clinical practice, they can be used to develop, test, and refine algorithms for clinical decision-making and inform the development and validation of practice guidelines.

    “Because adaptive approaches approximate intervention sequences used in clinical practice, they can be used to develop, test, and refine algorithms for clinical decision-making and inform the development and validation of practice guidelines [64].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [64] Sherrill JT. Adaptive treatment strategies in youth mental health: a commentary on advantages, challenges, and potential directions. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2016;45(4):522–7. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Practicing these skills in different fear-inducing contexts supports generalization of inhibitory learning and stronger extinction of fear responses.

    “Practicing these skills in different fear-inducing contexts supports generalization of inhibitory learning and stronger extinction of fear responses [78].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [78] Craske MG, Treanor M, Conway CC, Zbozinek T, Vervliet B. Maximizing exposure therapy: an inhibitory learning approach. Behav Res Ther. 2014;58:10–23. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Exposure generates new learning of safety-based associations that inhibit former fear response associations to the feared stimulus, thereby either extinguishing the fear response or enabling a level of fear tolerance that reduces anxious distress.

    “This exposure generates new learning of safety-based associations that inhibit former fear response associations to the feared stimulus [77, 78, 118], thereby either extinguishing the fear response or enabling a level of fear tolerance that reduces anxious distress.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [77] Weisman JS, Rodebaugh TL. Exposure therapy augmentation: a review and extension of techniques informed by an inhibitory learning approach. Clin Psychol Rev. 2018;59:41–51. source
    • cites [78] Craske MG, Treanor M, Conway CC, Zbozinek T, Vervliet B. Maximizing exposure therapy: an inhibitory learning approach. Behav Res Ther. 2014;58:10–23. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [118] McLean CP, Foa EB. Prolonged exposure therapy for post-traumatic stress disorder: a review of evidence and dissemination. Expert Rev Neurother. 2011;11(8):1151–63. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Prior studies have shown that a better therapeutic alliance precedes and predicts better outcomes, and better outcomes precede and predict an improved therapeutic alliance.

    “Prior studies have shown that a better therapeutic alliance precedes and predicts better outcomes, and better outcomes precede and predict an improved therapeutic alliance [71, 73, 84].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [71] Cuijpers P, Reijnders M, Huibers MJH. The role of common factors in psychotherapy outcomes. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2019;15:207–31. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [73] DeRubeis RJ, Brotman MA, Gibbons CJ. A conceptual and methodological analysis of the nonspecifics argument. Clin Psychol Sci Pract. 2005;12(2):174–83. source
    • cites [84] Zilcha-Mano S. Is the alliance really therapeutic? Revisiting this question in light of recent methodological advances. Am Psychol. 2017;72(4):311–25. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Two factors common to all clinical encounters, alliance-building and reward, are explicitly components of Coping Cat CBT and at least implicitly components of the psychopharmacological treatments.

    “Of the many potential factors common to all clinical encounters, two are explicitly components of Coping Cat CBT, “alliance-building” and “reward”, and they are at least implicitly components of the psychopharmacological treatments as well (Table 1).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Table 1

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Premisecitation

    Adaptive interventions resemble clinical practice, in that different interventions are assigned to different individuals and within individuals over time, with the intervention(s) ideally varying in response to patient needs and patient response.

    “Adaptive interventions resemble clinical practice, in that different interventions are assigned to different individuals and within individuals over time, with the intervention(s) ideally varying in response to patient needs and patient response [62].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [62] Collins LM, Murphy SA, Bierman KL. A conceptual framework for adaptive preventive interventions. Prev Sci. 2004;5(3):185–96. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    All study assessments have been selected as parent- and youth-reports that require minimal to no interactions with research staff, thereby minimizing or eliminating rater bias from study staff.

    “Nevertheless, all study assessments have been selected as parent- and youth-reports that require minimal to no interactions with research staff, thereby minimizing or eliminating rater bias from study staff.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The study statistician will develop and monitor fidelity to the randomization sequence.

    “The study statistician will develop and monitor fidelity to the randomization sequence.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Participants are often concerned about being randomized to a less effective treatment.

    “Participants are often concerned about being randomized to a less effective treatment [141, 142], but here the 2 treatment arms will be in true clinical equipoise [143].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [141] Food & Drug Administration. FDA Executive Summary: 2017 Meeting Materials of the Patient Engagement Advisory Committee 2017 [Available from: https://www.fda.gov/AdvisoryCommittees/CommitteesMeetingMaterials/PatientEngagementAdvisoryCommittee/ucm578522.htm.

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [142] Ross S, Grant A, Counsell C, Gillespie W, Russell I, Prescott R. Barriers to participation in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review. J Clin Epidemiol. 1999;52(12):1143–56. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Paroxetine has a risk of increased suicidality, which may be higher compared to other SSRIs, and it does not have any FDA-approved pediatric indications.

    “Because of its risk of increased suicidality, which may be higher when compared to other SSRIs [166], and because it does not have any FDA-approved pediatric indications, we elected not to include paroxetine in this protocol.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [166] Hammad TA, Laughren T, Racoosin J. Suicidality in pediatric patients treated with antidepressant drugs. JAMA Psychiatry. 2006;63(3):332–9. source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductcitation

    404 children ages 8-17 who have an anxiety disorder will be randomized 1:1 to receive 12 weeks of either fluoxetine in upward-titrated dosages or weekly CBT implemented using the Coping Cat CBT model.

    “404 children ages 8–17 who have an anxiety disorder will be randomized 1:1 to receive 12 weeks of either the medication fluoxetine in upward-titrated dosages or weekly CBT implemented using the Coping Cat CBT model [128].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [128] Kendall PC, Hedke KA. Cognitive behavioral therapy for anxious children: therapist manual. 3rd ed. Admore: PA; 2006.
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The trial is a single-blind SMART with two levels of randomization, one in each of two 12-week stages.

    “This is a single-blind Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial (SMART) of 24 weeks duration with two levels of randomization, one in each of two 12-week stages.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    SSRI therapeutic response is significantly greater and faster than SNRI response.

    “We selected the SSRI fluoxetine rather than an SNRI because SSRI therapeutic response is significantly greater and faster [21, 22, 129].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [21] Strawn JR, Mills JA, Sauley BA, Welge JA. The Impact of Antidepressant Dose and Class on Treatment Response in Pediatric Anxiety Disorders: A Meta-Analysis. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2018;57(4):235–44.e2. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [22] Dobson ET, Bloch MH, Strawn JR. Efficacy and Tolerability of Pharmacotherapy for Pediatric Anxiety Disorders: A Network Meta-Analysis. J Clin Psychiatry. 2019;80(1):e1-e14. source
    • cites [129] Jakubovski E, Johnson JA, Nasir M, Müller-Vahl K, Bloch MH. Systematic review and meta-analysis: dose–response curve of SSRIs and SNRIs in anxiety disorders. Depress Anxiety. 2019;36(3):198–212. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    This will be a single-blind SMART design of 24-week treatment duration that will employ two sequential levels of randomization, one in each of two 12-week stages.

    “This will be a single-blind [126, 127] SMART design [51, 52] of 24-week treatment duration that will employ two sequential levels of randomization, one in each of two 12-week stages of the study (Fig. 2).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [126] Duddy A, Franke K, Whihcher DM, Moloney RM, Karkare SU. Making Informed Decisions: Assessing the Strengths and Weaknesses of Study Designs and Analytic Methods for Comparative Effectiveness Research. In: Velengtas P, Mohr P, Messner DA, editors. National Pharmaceutical Council; 2012.

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [127] Olsen LA, McGinnis JM. Redesigning the Clinical Effectiveness Research Paradigm: Innovation and Practice-Based Approaches: Workshop Summary. Institute of Medicine (US) Roundtable on Value & Science-Driven Health Care. Washington (DC): The National Academies Collection: Reports funded by National Institutes of Health; 2010.

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [51] Murphy SA. An experimental design for the development of adaptive treatment strategies. Stat Med. 2005;24(10):1455–81. source

      Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.

    • cites [52] Ogbagaber SB, Karp J, Wahed AS. Design of sequentially randomized trials for testing adaptive treatment strategies. Stat Med. 2016;35(6):840–58. source

      Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    ROC curves for the Child Trauma Screen indicate that requiring a parent reaction score ≥10 will miss approximately 22% of true PTSD cases but will not exclude any who are incorrectly diagnosed.

    “ROC curves for this screener [134, 135] indicate that by requiring a score of ≥10 on the parent report for child reaction to past trauma, we will miss diagnosing approximately 22% of true PTSD cases but we will not exclude any who are incorrectly diagnosed.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [134] Lang JM, Connell CM. Development and validation of a brief trauma screening measure for children: the child trauma screen. Psychol Trauma. 2017;9(3):390–8. source
    • cites [135] Lang JM, Connell CM. The child trauma screen: a follow-up validation. J Trauma Stress. 2018;31(4):540–8. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In CAMS, African-American youths attended fewer CBT and medication management sessions, and were rated by therapists as less involved and compliant with treatment and possibly as showing a lower level of mastery of CBT concepts.

    “In CAMS, African-American youths attended fewer CBT and medication management sessions, and they were rated by therapists as less involved and compliant with treatment and, possibly as a consequence, as showing a lower level of mastery of CBT concepts [41].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [41] Gordon-Hollingsworth AT, Becker EM, Ginsburg GS, Keeton C, Compton SN, Birmaher BB, et al. Anxiety disorders in Caucasian and African American children: a comparison of clinical characteristics, treatment process variables, and treatment outcomes. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2015;46(5):643–55. source

      Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Sertraline may require twice daily dosing for optimal use at lower doses, which can adversely affect treatment adherence and complicate prescribing by pediatricians who are new to prescribing psychotropics.

    “In addition, like escitalopram, sertraline may require twice daily dosing for optimal use at lower doses [170], which can adversely affect treatment adherence and complicate prescribing by pediatricians who are new to prescribing psychotropics.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [170] Axelson DA, Perel JM, Birmaher B, Rudolph GR, Nuss S, Bridge J, et al. Sertraline pharmacokinetics and dynamics in adolescents. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2002;41(9):1037–44. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Randomization will be blocked with a relatively small block size to ensure balanced randomization over the short term, and block size will not be revealed to investigators or trial staff.

    “Randomization will be further blocked, with a relatively small block size to ensure balanced randomization over the short term; block size will not be revealed to investigators or trial staff.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The randomization sequence will not be viewable.

    “The randomization sequence will not be viewable.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Serotonin HT1b receptors on the presynaptic terminal also desensitize, further increasing presynaptic transmission and increasing serotonin available to stimulate postsynaptic neurons.

    “Serotonin HT1b receptors on the presynaptic terminal then also desensitize, further increasing presynaptic transmission and increasing the serotonin available to stimulate postsynaptic neurons.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [122] Fasipe O. Neuropharmacological classification of antidepressant agents based on their mechanisms of action. Archiv Med Health Sci. 2018;6(1):81–94. source

      Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Efficacy measures in the CAMS trial outperformed specific measures of cognitive change in mediational models on Coping Cat effects, suggesting that development of coping efficacy may mediate CBT outcomes.

    “In addition, efficacy measures in the CAMS trial outperformed specific measures of cognitive change in mediational models on Coping Cat effects, suggesting that development of coping efficacy may mediate CBT outcomes [120].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [120] Kendall PC, Cummings CM, Villabø MA, Narayanan MK, Treadwell K, Birmaher B, et al. Mediators of change in the child/adolescent anxiety multimodal treatment study. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2016;84(1):1–14. source

      Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Optimization of medication dosing often is not complete within the first 12 weeks, particularly for younger participants, and the effects of any given dose may not fully manifest for 12 weeks or more.

    “Third, optimization of medication dosing often is not complete within the first 12 weeks, particularly for younger participants, and the effects of any given dose may not fully manifest for 12 weeks or more [21, 22, 129]; thus, the effects of Stage 1 dose increases may not manifest until Stage 2.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [21] Strawn JR, Mills JA, Sauley BA, Welge JA. The Impact of Antidepressant Dose and Class on Treatment Response in Pediatric Anxiety Disorders: A Meta-Analysis. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2018;57(4):235–44.e2. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [22] Dobson ET, Bloch MH, Strawn JR. Efficacy and Tolerability of Pharmacotherapy for Pediatric Anxiety Disorders: A Network Meta-Analysis. J Clin Psychiatry. 2019;80(1):e1-e14. source
    • cites [129] Jakubovski E, Johnson JA, Nasir M, Müller-Vahl K, Bloch MH. Systematic review and meta-analysis: dose–response curve of SSRIs and SNRIs in anxiety disorders. Depress Anxiety. 2019;36(3):198–212. source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductcitation

    The stringency of the remission criteria is based on reviewed prior studies indicating the importance of achieving diagnostic remission, with few residual symptoms and minimal functional impairment, in optimizing long-term clinical outcomes.

    “The stringency of these remission criteria is based on the reviewed prior studies indicating the importance of achieving diagnostic remission, with few residual symptoms and minimal functional impairment, in optimizing long-term clinical outcomes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    An intent-to-treat analysis will compare youth randomized to fluoxetine first versus those randomized to CBT first.

    “An intent-to-treat analysis will compare youth randomized to fluoxetine first versus those randomized to CBT first (“Main Effect 1”).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Medication adherence will be assessed with pill counts at each clinic visit.

    “Medication adherence will be assessed with pill counts at each clinic visit.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Los Angeles County is one of the most racially, ethnically, and socioeconomically diverse regions in the world.

    “Los Angeles County (LAC) is one of the most racially, ethnically, and socioeconomically diverse regions in the world [131].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [131] "B03002 HISPANIC OR LATINO ORIGIN BY RACE - Los Angeles County - 2019 American community survey 1-year estimates". US Census Bureau July 1, 2019. Retrieved March 12, 2021.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Patient nonadherence (poor attendance, low homework completion, poor compliance in session) was associated with number of parents present in the home, with best outcomes for two-parent families, although indices of nonadherence varied in their power to predict clinical outcomes.

    “Similarly, patient nonadherence (poor attendance, low homework completion, poor compliance in session) was associated with number of parents present in the home (with the best outcomes for two-parent families), although indices of nonadherence varied in their power to predict clinical outcomes [124].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [124] Lee P, Zehgeer A, Ginsburg GS, McCracken J, Keeton C, Kendall PC, et al. Child and adolescent adherence with cognitive behavioral therapy for anxiety: predictors and associations with outcomes. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2019;48(sup1):S215–S26. source

      Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The study is designated "single blind" in the sense that patients and clinicians are not blinded but assessments minimize rater bias.

    “It is in this sense that we designate this study “single blind”.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationnone given

    Use of patient-report measures to define remission at Week 12 will allow the study to quickly evaluate clinical status and move to either maintenance treatment or second-stage randomization with minimum disruption in care.

    “Our use of patient-report measures to define remission at Week 12 will allow us to quickly evaluate clinical status and move to either maintenance treatment or second-stage randomization with minimum disruption in care.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    This protocol, version 1.0, was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov on February 17, 2021 with Identifier: NCT04760275.

    “This protocol, version 1.0, was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov on February 17, 2021 with Identifier: NCT04760275.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    SSRIs inhibit presynaptic reuptake of serotonin after its release into the synaptic cleft, which over time desensitizes HT1a serotonin receptors on or near the cell body of the presynaptic neuron.

    “SSRIs inhibit the presynaptic reuptake of serotonin after its release into the synaptic cleft, which in turn, over time, desensitizes HT1a serotonin receptors on or near the cell body of the presynaptic neuron [122].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [122] Fasipe O. Neuropharmacological classification of antidepressant agents based on their mechanisms of action. Archiv Med Health Sci. 2018;6(1):81–94. source

      Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Prospective prescribers will undergo a 3-hour training with two senior psychopharmacologists before being assigned any patients for treatment.

    “They will undergo a 3-hour training for the study with two senior psychopharmacologists before being assigned any patients for treatment.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    All participants who do not remit in Stage 1 will be randomized 1:1 to either optimization of their Stage 1 treatment or optimization of their Stage 1 treatment and addition of the other treatment modality.

    “All participants who do not remit in Stage 1 will be randomized 1:1 to either (1) optimization of their Stage 1 treatment, or (2) optimization of their Stage 1 treatment and addition of the other treatment modality (Fig. 2).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Because PCORI guidelines preclude paying for any component of clinical care, insurance will need to pay for study treatments, which in turn will preclude blinding patients and clinicians to treatment assignment.

    “Because PCORI guidelines preclude paying for any component of clinical care, insurance will need to pay for study treatments, which in turn will preclude blinding patients and clinicians to treatment assignment.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The risk of early withdrawal from CBT is low and the number will likely be small.

    “This suggests that the risk of early withdrawal from CBT is low and that the number will likely be small.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Service utilization data from the authors' treatment sites mirror the prior findings of low early withdrawal from CBT.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The trial data management protocol will include immediate post-data entry notifications, tracking of rectifications of missing data, and daily review of new data entries with immediate notification to data entry personnel and site coordinator for rectifications needed for missing data.

    “The trial data management protocol will include immediate post-data entry notifications, tracking of rectifications of missing data, and daily review of new data entries with immediate notification to data entry personnel and site coordinator for rectifications needed for missing data.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Rates of relapse in pediatric anxiety disorders are very high (approximately 60%), particularly in those who have more residual symptoms and functional impairment following acute treatment.

    “and rates of relapse are very high (approximately 60%) [16, 28, 29], particularly in those who have more residual symptoms and functional impairment following acute treatment [29].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [16] Scholten WD, Batelaan NM, Penninx BWJH, Balkom AJLMv, Smit JH, Schoevers RA, et al. Diagnostic instability of recurrence and the impact on recurrence rates in depressive and anxiety disorders. J Affect Disord. 2016;195:185–90. source
    • cites [28] Scholten WD, Batelaan NM, van Balkom AJLM. Wjh. Penninx B, Smit JH, van Oppen P. recurrence of anxiety disorders and its predictors. J Affect Disord. 2013;147(1):180–5. source
    • cites [29] Ginsburg GS, Becker-Haimes EM, Keeton C, Kendall PC, Iyengar S, Sakolsky D, et al. Results from the child/adolescent anxiety multimodal extended long-term study (CAMELS): primary anxiety outcomes. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2018;57(7):471–80. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The remaining 50% of improvement occurs over the last 8 weeks of treatment, approaching asymptote by week 12.

    “suggesting that the remaining 50% of improvement occurs over the last 8 weeks of treatment, approaching asymptote by week 12.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The planned adaptation is designed to intensify the maintenance protocol from CAMS by increasing the total number of sessions from 6 to 12 and the density of delivery from monthly to weekly, and thus to optimize the dose of exposure learning.

    “Our planned adaptation is designed to intensify the maintenance protocol from CAMS by increasing the total number of sessions (from 6 to 12) and the density of delivery (weekly versus monthly) and thus to optimize the dose of exposure learning.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In the post-acute phase of CAMS, patients in the CBT arm were offered 6 additional CBT sessions over 6 months, focusing on additional exposure practice and coaching to maintain application of CBT skills.

    “In the post-acute phase of CAMS, patients in the CBT arm were offered 6 additional CBT sessions to be delivered over 6 months, focusing on additional exposure practice and coaching to maintain application of CBT skills in the face of emerging life stressors [42].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [42] Piacentini J, Bennett S, Compton SN, Kendall PC, Birmaher B, Albano AM, et al. 24- and 36-week outcomes for the child/adolescent anxiety multimodal study (CAMS). J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2014;53(3):297–310. source

      Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    All electronic connections to the REDCap environment are encrypted.

    “All electronic connections to the REDCap environment are encrypted.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductcitation

    A trained fidelity rater will listen to all 12 sessions of a randomly selected study case from each clinician and rate fidelity using a standardized fidelity checklist developed for Coping Cat.

    “We will randomly select 1 study case from each clinician (assigned after their initial 2 training cases); a trained fidelity rater will listen to all 12 sessions of this case and rate fidelity using a standardized fidelity checklist developed for Coping Cat [180, 181].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [180] Kendall PC. Treating anxiety disorders in children: results of a randomized clinical trial. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1994;62(1):100–10. source
    • cites [181] Kendall PC, Flannery-Schroeder E, Panichelli-Mindel SM, Southam-Gerow M, Henin A, Warman M. Therapy for youths with anxiety disorders: a second randomized clinical trial. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1997;65(3):366–80. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The authors will institute policies that temporarily deactivate user accounts that have not logged into the system within a specified time; automatically require staff to change passwords at regular intervals; match current users against current study staff, and terminate user accounts for staff who no longer are associated with the project; and institute independent audits at regular intervals by

    “We will institute policies that (a) temporarily deactivate user accounts that have not logged into the system within a specified time; (b) automatically require staff to change passwords at regular intervals; (c) match current users against current study staff, and terminate user accounts for staff who no longer are associated with the project; and (d) institute independent audits at regular”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation

    A measure of general therapy competence that has been used with Coping Cat will be included to help assess the quality of treatment delivery, including exposure practices.

    “We will also include a measure of general therapy competence that has been used with Coping Cat and can help assess the quality of treatment delivery, including exposure practices [185].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [185] Brown RC, Southam-Gerow MA, McLeod BD, Wheat EB, Tully CB, Reise SP, et al. The global therapist competence scale for youth psychosocial treatment: development and initial validation. J Clin Psychol. 2018;74(4):649–64. source

      Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The study will attempt to complete trial outcomes at protocol-specified assessment times on all randomized persons, even those who have dropped from the study.

    “We will attempt to complete trial outcomes at protocol-specified assessment times on all randomized persons, even those who have dropped from the study.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The project analyst will review data weekly to ensure completeness; a weekly report to investigators and study coordinators will identify outstanding missing data.

    “Our project analyst will review data weekly to ensure completeness; a weekly report to investigators and study coordinators will identify outstanding missing data that needs to be completed, as well as a time field indicating number of days since the missing data query was first generated.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Even within efficacy trials for CBT, crisis management sessions are built into the design of the protocol, as they represent good clinical care, compliance with legal requirements, and appropriate adherence to evidence-based treatment.

    “Note that even within efficacy trials for CBT, crisis management sessions are built into the design of the protocol, as they represent good clinical care, compliance with legal requirements (e.g., mandated reporting), and appropriate adherence to evidence-based treatment [42].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [42] Piacentini J, Bennett S, Compton SN, Kendall PC, Birmaher B, Albano AM, et al. 24- and 36-week outcomes for the child/adolescent anxiety multimodal study (CAMS). J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2014;53(3):297–310. source

      Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In CAMS, outcomes did not differ significantly in CBT alone vs medication alone (though group mean differences on the PARS slightly favored medication over CBT).

    “Outcomes did not differ significantly in CBT alone vs medication alone (though group mean differences on the PARS slightly favored medication over CBT).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [42] Piacentini J, Bennett S, Compton SN, Kendall PC, Birmaher B, Albano AM, et al. 24- and 36-week outcomes for the child/adolescent anxiety multimodal study (CAMS). J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2014;53(3):297–310. source

      Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    The CAMS maintenance treatment consisted of 6 additional CBT sessions delivered over 6 months, focusing on additional exposure practice and coaching in the application of CBT skills to emerging life stressors.

    “This maintenance treatment consisted of 6 additional CBT sessions to be delivered over 6 months, focusing on additional exposure practice and coaching in the application CBT skills to emerging life stressors [42].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [42] Piacentini J, Bennett S, Compton SN, Kendall PC, Birmaher B, Albano AM, et al. 24- and 36-week outcomes for the child/adolescent anxiety multimodal study (CAMS). J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2014;53(3):297–310. source

      Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    REDCap is a secure, HIPAA-compliant, widely used web-based research application that supports calculations and branching logic programming.

    “REDCap is a secure, HIPAA-compliant, widely used web-based research application that supports calculations and branching logic programming.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [165] Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377–81. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Study design and conductnone given

    If clinicians are trained in both Coping Cat CBT and fluoxetine administration, their caseloads will be balanced with patients from each arm of the study to control for any possible clinician-level effects.

    “If clinicians are trained in both Coping Cat CBT and fluoxetine administration, their caseloads will be balanced with patients from each arm of the study to control for any possible clinician-level effects.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Amount of time spent in session on exposures, focus on mastery of difficult exposures, and child adherence with tasks and mastery of skills predicted better clinical outcomes in the CAMS trial.

    “Amount of time spent in session on exposures, focus on mastery of difficult exposures, and child adherence with tasks and mastery of skills -- all these elements of treatment delivery predicted better clinical outcomes in the CAMS trial [119].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [119] Peris TS, Caporino NE, O’Rourke S, Kendall PC, Walkup JT, Albano AM, et al. Therapist-reported features of exposure tasks that predict differential treatment outcomes for youth with anxiety. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2017;56(12):1043–52. source

      Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The goal of achieving clinical remission is imperative in improving outcomes, which requires assertive optimization of medication dosing.

    “Therefore, the goal of achieving clinical remission is imperative in improving outcomes, which requires assertive optimization of medication dosing.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In Phase 1 of CAMS, youths were randomized to CBT, SSRI, Combination (COMB), or placebo and clinical outcomes assessed at 12 weeks.

    “In Phase 1 of the CAMS anxiety trial, youths were randomized with either CBT, SSRI, Combination (COMB), or placebo and clinical outcomes assessed at 12 weeks.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [42] Piacentini J, Bennett S, Compton SN, Kendall PC, Birmaher B, Albano AM, et al. 24- and 36-week outcomes for the child/adolescent anxiety multimodal study (CAMS). J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2014;53(3):297–310. source

      Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Programming the REDCap database to require responses to all survey and interview questions and real-time documentation of reasons for missing data will reduce missing data due to data entry errors.

    “We will program our REDCap database to require responses to all survey and interview questions and real-time documentation of reasons for missing data. Reasons for truly missing data (e.g., if participants are uncomfortable completing specific items) will be completed at the time of data collection and documented during data entry. This will also reduce missing data due to data entry errors.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The authors will ensure that the database systems, data access policies, and data transmission protocols exceed HIPPA regulations and data security standards for IRBs.

    “We will ensure the database systems, data access policies, and data transmission protocols exceed HIPPA regulations and data security standards for IRBs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    After the acute phase, in Phase 2, responders were offered 6 months of continuing monthly maintenance treatment in their originally assigned condition.

    “After this acute phase, in Phase 2, responders were offered 6 months of continuing monthly maintenance treatment in their originally assigned condition.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [42] Piacentini J, Bennett S, Compton SN, Kendall PC, Birmaher B, Albano AM, et al. 24- and 36-week outcomes for the child/adolescent anxiety multimodal study (CAMS). J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2014;53(3):297–310. source

      Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    All Coping Cat therapists will undergo Coping Cat training and participate in ongoing consultation and fidelity measurement.

    “All will undergo Coping Cat training and participate in ongoing consultation and fidelity measurement.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In a prior study, 139 children randomized to 12 weeks of Coping Cat treatment, none withdrew during the entire 12 weeks (though 6 (4.3%) were lost to study).

    “in a relevant prior study [49], 139 children were randomized to 12 weeks of Coping Cat treatment, and none of those children withdrew from treatment during the entire 12 weeks (though 6 (4.3%) were lost to the study).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [49] Walkup JT, Albano AM, Piacentini J, Birmaher B, Compton SN, Sherrill JT, et al. Cognitive behavioral therapy, sertraline, or a combination in childhood anxiety. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(26):2753–66. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The CBT strategies that form the core of Coping Cat have been subjected to years of extensive research through clinical trials, have been shown to be highly efficacious in addressing symptoms of a range of anxiety disorders, and are widely available at low cost.

    “The CBT strategies that form the core of Coping Cat have been subjected to years of extensive research through clinical trials [183, 184], have been shown to be highly efficacious in addressing symptoms of a range of anxiety disorders, and are widely available at low cost.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [183] Craske MG, Stein MB, Sullivan G, Sherbourne C, Bystritsky A, Rose RD, et al. Disorder-specific impact of coordinated anxiety learning and management treatment for anxiety disorders in primary care. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2011;68(4):378–88. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [184] Craske MG, Roy-Byrne P, Stein MB, Sullivan G, Hazlett-Stevens H, Bystritsky A, et al. CBT intensity and outcome for panic disorder in a primary care setting. Behav Ther. 2006;37(2):112–9. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    The authors' primary aims and hypotheses are tested as two main effects and their interaction, which require a sample size considerably smaller than for a 6-way ANCOVA.

    “That analysis, however, does not correspond with our primary aims and hypotheses, which are tested as two main effects and their interaction, and which require a sample size considerably smaller than for a 6-way ANCOVA [54].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [54] Almirall D, Nahum-Shani I, Sherwood NE, Murphy SA. Introduction to SMART designs for the development of adaptive interventions: with application to weight loss research. Transl Behav Med. 2014;4(3):260–74. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Upward titrations will be slowed in some youth due to the emergence of side effects or because clinicians will be reluctant to increase the dose only 2 weeks after the last dose increase.

    “In addition, upward titrations will be slowed in some youth due to the emergence of side effects or because clinicians will be reluctant to increase the dose only 2 weeks after the last dose increase, instead wanting more time to observe for clinical improvement.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    All data files transmitted to investigators will be encrypted and password-protected at the highest level of data encryption, then transmitted via a secure File Transfer Protocol.

    “All data files transmitted to investigators will be encrypted and password-protected at the highest level of data encryption, then transmitted via a secure File Transfer Protocol.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Any deviations from the manualized structure and content of Coping Cat will be recorded via a session adherence form completed by the clinician and presented/discussed at study team meetings.

    “Any deviations from the manualized structure and content of Coping Cat will be recorded via a session adherence form completed by the clinician and presented/discussed at study team meetings.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Coping Cat is an established evidence-based CBT treatment for pediatric anxiety that has been studied rigorously for more than 25 years.

    “Coping Cat is an established evidence-based CBT treatment for pediatric anxiety [180–182] that has been studied rigorously for more than 25 years.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [180] Kendall PC. Treating anxiety disorders in children: results of a randomized clinical trial. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1994;62(1):100–10. source
    • cites [181] Kendall PC, Flannery-Schroeder E, Panichelli-Mindel SM, Southam-Gerow M, Henin A, Warman M. Therapy for youths with anxiety disorders: a second randomized clinical trial. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1997;65(3):366–80. source
    • cites [182] Flannery-Schroeder EC, Kendall PC. Group and individual cognitive-behavioral treatments for youth with anxiety disorders: a randomized clinical trial. Cogn Ther Res. 2000;24(3):251–78. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The REDCap server is housed behind multiple firewalls in a locked and guarded USC data center equipped with security cameras and intrusion detection systems that is staffed by security at all times.

    “The REDCap server is housed behind multiple firewalls in a locked and guarded USC data center equipped with security cameras and intrusion detection systems that is staffed by security at all times.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Crosswalks linking participant names and medical record numbers to study numbers will be kept by the Principal Investigator in a locked file and destroyed at the end of the study.

    “Crosswalks that link a participant’s name and medical record number to that person’s study number will be kept by the Principal Investigator in a locked file and will be destroyed at the end of the study.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The PI and study staff will immediately report to the DSMB any adverse patient or caregiver outcomes.

    “They also will immediately report to the DSMB any adverse patient or caregiver outcomes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    No data containing participant identifiers will be transferred outside CHLA or USC.

    “No data containing participant identifiers will be transferred outside CHLA or USC.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    With an estimated 20% dropout, the study will have power to detect effect sizes of 0.52 for 60% subgroup representation (n=116), 0.58 for 50% (n=96), and 0.64 for 40% (n=78) for Main Effect 2 (total n=194).

    “For Main Effect 2 (total n = 194), we will be able to detect: (1) Effect Size = 0.52 for 60% representation (n = 116); (2) Effect Size = 0.58 for 50% representation (n = 96); (3) Effect Size = 0.64 for 40% representation (n = 78).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The study will convene a Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) that is fully independent from the sponsor and competing interests.

    “We will convene a Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) that is fully independent from the sponsor and competing interests.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Statistical significance of the direct effect coefficient c2 signifies that mediation by M is partial.

    “We will assess the significance of the direct effect (coefficient c2 in eq. 3): statistical significance of this term will signify that mediation by M is partial [206, 207].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [206] MacKinnon DP, Krull JL, Lockwood CM. Equivalence of the mediation, confounding and suppression effect. Prev Sci. 2000;1(4):173–81. source
    • cites [207] Zhao X, Lynch JG, Chen Q. Reconsidering baron and Kenny: myths and truths about mediation analysis. J Consum Res. 2010;37(2):197–206. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Participants will be identified only by a random subject ID number on both raw and electronic study data, in lieu of names or medical record numbers.

    “In lieu of participant names or medical record numbers, participants will be identified only by a random subject ID number on both the raw and electronic study data.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Study personnel will be required to sign confidentiality agreements and will be trained in the protection of human subjects.

    “Study personnel will be required to sign confidentiality agreements and will be trained in the protection of human subjects.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    With an estimated 20% dropout, the study will have power to detect effect sizes of 0.40 for 60% subgroup representation (n=194), 0.44 for 50% (n=162), and 0.50 for 40% (n=130) for Main Effect 1 (total n=324).

    “With an estimated 20% dropout, we will be able to detect the following effect sizes for Main Effect 1 (total n = 324) in various subgroups by sample representation (n): (1) Effect Size = 0.40 for 60% representation (n = 194); (2) Effect Size = 0.44 for 50% representation (n = 162); (3) Effect Size = 0.50 for 40% representation (n = 130).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The study will include sensitivity analyses to assess the impact of analytic and modelling assumptions related to covariate selection, missing data handling, and adherence to randomized intervention.

    “These will assess the impact of analytic and modelling assumptions related to selection of covariates, handling of missing data, and adherence to randomized intervention.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    An RCT comparing telehealth vs in-person CBT over 24 weeks in 115 youth with adolescent anxiety disorder found an effect size for the Clinician Severity Rating outcome measure of 0.05 (95% CI -0.77, 0.95), a non-significant difference with the direction of effect favoring in-person CBT.

    “The second [196] is an RCT comparing telehealth vs in-person CBT over 24 weeks (the same duration as our study) in 115 youth with adolescent anxiety disorder. For consistency with our sample size calculations (which used the primary outcome from the CAMS trial, the clinician-rated Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale), we estimated the effect size for the Clinician Severity Rating outcome measure, which”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [196] Spence SH, Donovan CL, March S, Gamble A, Anderson RE, Prosser S, et al. A randomized controlled trial of online versus clinic-based CBT for adolescent anxiety. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2011;79(5):629–42. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The primary outcome (Youth SCARED) will be tested at an α = 0.05.

    “The primary outcome (Youth SCARED) will be tested at an α = 0.05.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Research staff members who collect study data will do so only from one of the study's 9 clinical facilities or research sites.

    “Research staff members who collect study data will do so only from one of our 9 clinical facilities or research sites.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The data safety-monitoring plan is designed to ensure the safety of participants, the validity of the data collected, and the appropriate termination of the study in the event that significant benefits or risks are uncovered, or if it appears that the trial cannot be concluded successfully.

    “Our data safety-monitoring plan is designed to ensure the safety of participants, the validity of the data collected, and the appropriate termination of the study in the event that significant benefits or risks are uncovered, or if it appears that the trial cannot be concluded successfully.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    This study protocol was reviewed and approved under the SMART Institutional Review Board (IRB) mechanism, with Children's Hospital Los Angeles the designated lead IRB.

    “This study protocol was reviewed and approved under the SMART Institutional Review Board (IRB) mechanism, with Children’s Hospital Los Angeles the designated lead IRB.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The DSMB will meet every six months to review study progress and adverse events.

    “The board will meet every six months to review study progress and adverse events.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    All participants will be provided contact information for the DSMB to register complaints or other problems.

    “All participants will be provided contact information for the DSMB to register complaints or other problems.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    To evaluate baseline comparability, the authors will compare demographic and clinical characteristics, and trial outcome measures, at baseline between treatment groups.

    “To evaluate baseline comparability, we will compare demographic and clinical characteristics, and trial outcome measures, at baseline between treatment groups.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation

    Evaluation of secondary, exploratory, and all subgroup analyses will control for the false discovery rate.

    “Evaluation of secondary, exploratory, and all subgroup analyses will control for the false discovery rate [200].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [200] Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B Methodol. 1995;57(1):289–300. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The DSMB will have the authority to recommend termination of the trial to the principal investigator and funding agency if it judges that a specific action is not in the best interest of study participants or that the conduct of study processes are unlikely to lead to sound scientific results.

    “The DSMB will have the authority to recommend termination of the trial to the principal investigator and funding agency if it judges that a specific action is not in the best interest of study participants or that the conduct of study processes are unlikely to lead to sound scientific results.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    With the total anticipated sample size of 324 to complete the 24-week intervention, the study will have 80% power to detect subgroup differences in treatment effect sizes of ~0.65 and higher for Main Effect 1, and ~0.8 and higher for Main Effect 2.

    “Subgroup interactions will be tested formally; with the total anticipated sample size of 324 to complete the 24-week intervention, we will have 80% power to detect subgroup differences in treatment effect sizes of ~ 0.65 and higher for Main Effect 1, and ~ 0.8 and higher for Main Effect 2.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    No independent audits for the study are planned.

    “No independent audits for the study are planned.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The randomization stratification factors (age group, clinical site, and dichotomized baseline parent SCARED-41), as well as baseline measures of the trial outcome (Youth SCARED ratings), will be included as model covariates.

    “The randomization stratification factors (age group,clinical site, and dichotomized baseline parent SCARED-41), as well as baseline measures of the trial outcome (Youth SCARED ratings), will be included as model covariates.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Medical service use data and participant names and contact information will be kept on a secured, non-networked computer stored in a locked, secured office, with password protection and access limited to the study PI and system analyst.

    “Medical service use data and participant names and contact information will be kept on a secured, non-networked computer (i.e., it will have no Internet access), which will be stored in a locked, secured office. The computer will be password-protected; only the study PI and system analyst will be permitted to access it.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The Main Effect 2 effect size was approximately 0.40 SD, requiring a sample size of 194 participants among Stage 1 non-remitters.

    “From our computations above, the Main Effect 2 ES was approximately 0.40 SD, requiring a sample size of 194 participants among Stage 1 non-remitters.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The authors will conduct an intent-to-treat analysis, by which subjects will be analyzed according to randomized intervention, consistent with standard practice in clinical trials.

    “We will conduct an intent-to-treat analysis, by which subjects will be analyzed according to randomized intervention, consistent with standard practice in clinical trials.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation

    The study will use conditional imputation models for missing data that take advantage of the time- and stage-ordered nature of the trial design, following Shortreed et al. (2014).

    “Following the recommendation of Shortreed et al. (2014) [201], we will employ conditional imputation models for missing data that take advantage of the time- and stage-ordered nature of the trial design.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Shortreed et al. (2014) [201] source

      Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.

129 of 129
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    No studies have assessed whether it is preferable to begin with CBT and then add medication if needed, or begin with medication and then add CBT if needed.

    “No studies have assessed whether it is preferable to begin with CBT and then add medication if needed, or begin with medication and then add CBT if needed.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Few studies have adequately tested the effectiveness of either treatment modality in complex and underserved families likely disproportionately affected by anxiety disorders.

    “Finally, few studies have adequately tested the effectiveness of either treatment modality in the complex and underserved families who are likely disproportionately affected by anxiety disorders.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Empirical data for the effectiveness of anxiety treatments in underserved families are particularly sparse for patient-centered outcomes and for the head-to-head comparison of CBT to medication.

    “Empirical data for the effectiveness of anxiety treatments in underserved families are particularly sparse for patient-centered outcomes and for the head-to-head comparison of CBT to medication.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Many guidelines recommend combining psychological and medication therapy after an unsatisfactory initial treatment response, but without evidence that combined therapy is better than continuing or intensifying the initial treatment.

    “Many guidelines recommend combining psychological and medication therapy after an unsatisfactory initial treatment response, but without evidence that combined therapy is better than continuing or intensifying the initial treatment.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The SMART design described here is the first of its kind of which the authors are aware.

    “The SMART design described here – the first of its kind of which we are aware -- will focus on identifying treatment sequences that optimize patient centered outcomes for pediatric anxiety disorders in ethnically diverse patients from underserved low- and middle-income households.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Clinicians often lack the empirical evidence needed to guide such intervention.

    “Clinicians, however, often lack the empirical evidence needed to guide such intervention.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In pediatric anxiety treatment, limited evidence exists to inform the decision about which treatment to begin with based on a particular patient’s characteristics and context, and what the clinician should do if the chosen treatment is not working.

    “In pediatric anxiety treatment, limited evidence exists to inform the decision about which treatment to begin with based on a particular patient’s characteristics and context, and what the clinician should do if the chosen treatment is not working.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Clinician relatedness provides a connection to a caring and empathic person that is therapeutic in itself, especially for patients with impoverished social relationships.

    “It provides the patient with a connection to a caring and empathic person, which is assumed to be therapeutic in itself, especially for patients who have impoverished social relationships [113–115].”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Most brain imaging studies of the effects of SSRI or SNRIs on brain structure and function have been poorly controlled and naturalistic.

    “Most brain imaging studies of the effects of SSRI or SNRIs on brain structure and function have been poorly controlled and naturalistic.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    We do not yet know precisely how medication, including fluoxetine and other SSRIs, improve symptoms in pediatric anxiety disorder.

    “We do not yet know precisely how medication, including fluoxetine and other SSRIs, improve symptoms in pediatric anxiety disorder.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    No viable treatment option beyond CBT, SSRI, or their combination exists for partial or non-responders.

    “First, no viable treatment option beyond CBT, SSRI, or their combination exists for partial or non-responders.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Coping Cat has 2 distinct phases of implementation, with phase 1 comprising psychoeducation, coping skills development, and initial introduction to exposure, and phase 2 intensifying treatment through more challenging and repeated exposure activities.

    “Coping Cat also has 2 distinct phases of implementation, with phase 1 comprising psychoeducation, coping skills development, and initial introduction to exposure, and phase 2 intensifying treatment through more challenging and repeated exposure activities, which map well onto our 2 SMART stages.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Coping Cat CBT was not designed for, nor is it an appropriate treatment for, OCD or PTSD.

    “Coping Cat CBT was not designed for, nor is it an appropriate treatment for, OCD or PTSD.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The most appropriate evidence-based treatments for OCD and PTSD are Exposure and Response Prevention for OCD, and Trauma-Focused CBT for PTSD.

    “The most appropriate evidence-based treatments for these two disorders are Exposure and Response Prevention for OCD, and Trauma-Focused CBT for PTSD.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Clinically significant PTSD usually requires combined medication and Trauma-Focused CBT from the outset.

    “Moreover, clinically significant PTSD usually requires combined medication and Trauma-Focused CBT from the outset, making these youth inappropriate for this clinical trial in which participants are initially assigned to a monotherapy.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Fluoxetine is helpful in treating both pediatric anxiety and depression.

    “Because fluoxetine is helpful in treating both pediatric anxiety and depression, we anticipate added benefits to fluoxetine in treating anxiety symptoms via its effects on comorbid depression”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The Stage 2 interventions mirror current best clinical practice.

    “The Stage 2 interventions mirror current best clinical practice in several ways.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Fluoxetine’s track record and safety are well established, and it is on nearly all formularies.

    “Fluoxetine’s track record and safety are well established, and it is on nearly all formularies.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Fluoxetine, sertraline, and escitalopram all have FDA-approved indications in pediatric patients.

    “we considered fluoxetine, sertraline, and escitalopram because they all have FDA-approved indications in pediatric patients.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Sertraline does not have proven antidepressant effects in pediatric patients and is not FDA-approved in this patient population for this indication.

    “First, it does not have proven antidepressant effects in pediatric patients and is not FDA-approved in this patient population for this indication”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    No prior studies of the use of escitalopram in the treatment of pediatric anxiety disorders are known.

    “Most importantly, we are aware of no prior studies of the use of escitalopram in the treatment of pediatric anxiety disorders.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In every pediatric psychopharmacology study published thus far that used a flexible dosing schedule, the average medication dosages achieved have been considerably lower than the maximum dose allowed.

    “In every pediatric psychopharmacology study published thus far that has used a flexible dosing schedule, however, the average medication dosages achieved have been considerably lower than the maximum dose allowed.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Fluoxetine has more data than any other agent to support its safety and efficacy as a treatment for pediatric affective illnesses, especially depression.

    “First, it has more data than any other agent to support its safety and efficacy as a treatment for pediatric affective illnesses (especially depression).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Service utilization data from the authors' treatment sites mirror the prior findings of low early withdrawal from CBT.

    “Moreover, these prior findings mirror service utilization data from our treatment sites.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Development of suicidality during treatment is a possibility.

    “The development of suicidality during treatment is a possibility; participants will therefore be assessed at each study visit with the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) [104].”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    All mental health care across the authors' sites converted to telehealth to comply with safety considerations during the COVID-19 pandemic.

    “This modification is motivated in part by the conversion of all mental health care across our sites to telehealth to comply with safety considerations during the COVID-19 pandemic.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Several performance sites, even before the pandemic, have long histories of conducting pharmacotherapy entirely by telehealth, given limited child psychiatry support.

    “In addition, several of our performance sites, even before the pandemic, have long histories of conducting pharmacotherapy entirely by telehealth, given the limited child psychiatry support available to cover wide geographic service regions.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The provision of psychotherapy by telehealth was accelerating at most of the authors' sites before the pandemic.

    “Moreover, the provision of psychotherapy by telehealth was accelerating at most of our sites before the pandemic.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    All the authors' sites at the time of study initiation are providing all non-emergency mental health care in this medium.

    “All our sites at the time of study initiation are providing all non-emergency mental health care in this medium.”
29 of 29

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Minimum follow-up is both 6 and 12 months

    Major

    The timeline allows as little as 6 months of naturalistic follow-up, whereas the long-term follow-up section promises at least 12 months for the last recruits.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 201 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Wang Z, Whiteside S, Sim L, Farah W, Morrow A, Alsawas M, et al. Anxiety in children. Comparative effectiveness. AHRQ comparative effectiveness reviews. Review no. 192 (prepared by the Mayo Clinic evidence-based practice center under contract no. 290–2015-00013-I.) ed. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2017.
  2. Wang Z, Whiteside SPH, Sim L, Farah W, Morrow AS, Alsawas M, et al. Comparative effectiveness and safety of cognitive behavioral therapy and pharmacotherapy for childhood anxiety disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr. 2017;171(11):1049–56. · DOI · Paper page
  3. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence: Clinical Guidelines. Social Anxiety Disorder: Recognition, Assessment and Treatment. Leicester (UK) 2013.
  4. Anxiety and Depression in Children and Youth – Diagnosis and Treatment. Guidelines & Protocols Advisory Committee, British Columbia Medical Services Commission. 2010.
  5. PROMIS. Meaning and Purpose Instruments 2018 [Available from: http://www.healthmeasures.net/images/PROMIS/manuals/PROMIS_Meaning_and_Purpose_Scoring_Manual.pdf.
  6. Achenbach TM. Manual for the child behavior checklist. Burlington: University of Vermont Department of Psychiatry; 2001.
  7. Achenbach TM. The Achenbach system of empirically based assessment (ASEBA): development, findings, theory, and applications. Burlington: University of Vermont Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families; 2009.
  8. Silverman WK, Albano AM. Anxiety disorders interview schedule (AIDS) – parent and child: Oxford University press; 2004.
  9. Duncan B, Miller S, Sparks J, Claud D, Reynolds L, Brown J, et al. The session rating scale: preliminary psychometric properties of a “working” alliance measurement. J Brief Ther. 2003;3(1):3–12.
  10. Duddy A, Franke K, Whihcher DM, Moloney RM, Karkare SU. Making Informed Decisions: Assessing the Strengths and Weaknesses of Study Designs and Analytic Methods for Comparative Effectiveness Research. In: Velengtas P, Mohr P, Messner DA, editors. National Pharmaceutical Council; 2012.
  11. Piantadosi S. Chapter 22: Factorial Designs. Clinical Trials: A Methodological Perspective. 3rd ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2017. p. 767–80.
  12. Herd S. Global Tips for Conducting Remote Focus Groups during COVID-19. Sutherland Labs https://wwwsutherlandlabscom/blog/global-tips-for-conducting-remote-focus-groups-during-covid-19/. 2020.
  13. Muzzy L, Muzzy F, Muzzy S. Conducting Virtual Focus Groups. Implementation Research Incubator (blog), https://wwwmdrcorg/publication/conducting-virtual-focus-groups. 2020.
  14. Heiligenstein JH, Hoog SL, Wagner KD, Findling RL, Galil N, Kaplan S, et al. Fluoxetine 40-60 mg versus fluoxetine 20 mg in the treatment of children and adolescents with a less-than-complete response to nine-week treatment with fluoxetine 10-20 mg: a pilot study. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2006;16(1–2):207–17. · DOI · Paper page
  15. Eli Lilly and Company. Prozac© Prescribing Information. 2009.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Peterson, B. S., West, A. E., Weisz, J. R., Mack, W. J., Kipke, M. D., Findling, R. L., Mittman, B. S., Bansal, R., Piantadosi, S., Takata, G., Koebnick, C., Ashen, C., Snowdy, C., Poulsen, M., Arora, B. K., Allem, C. M., Perez, M., Marcy, S. N., Hudson, B. O., Chan, S. H., & Weersing, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
  • Kaiser Permanente (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Children's Hospital Los Angeles (US)
  • San Diego State University (US)
Corresponding author
Peterson, Bradley S.
Venue
BMC Psychiatry
Published
2021-06-30
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
323-323
ISSN
1471-244X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3173794038
Cited by
13
References
201
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2
FWCI
0.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PEDS-2019C1-16008)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
childhood anxiety disorders, fluoxetine, cognitive behavioral therapy, treatment sequencing, combination therapy, treatment optimization, sequential multiple assignment randomized trial, treatment durability, ethnic minority children, underserved populations, SCARED
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Animals, Anxiety Disorders, Cats, Child, Fluoxetine, Humans, Psychotherapy, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Single-Blind Method, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-11-06.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-11-06.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review