Cited by 27Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesAging and Gerontology ResearchMemory Processes and Influences

Anxiety-linked expectancy bias across the adult lifespan

Open access
Steinman, Shari A., Smyth, Frederick L., Bucks, Romola S., MacLeod, Colin, Teachman, Bethany A.·2013·Cognition & Emotion

Abstract

Anxiety is characterised by a negative expectancy bias, such that anxious individuals report negatively distorted expectations about the future. Contrary to anxiety, ageing is characterised by a positivity effect, such that ageing is associated with a tendency to attend to and remember positive information, relative to negative information. The current study integrates these literatures to examine anxiety- and age-linked biases when thinking about the future. Participants (N=1,109) completed a procedure that involved reading valenced scenarios (positive, negative, or ambiguous) and then rating the likelihood of future valenced events occurring. Results suggest that ageing and anxiety have independent and opposing effects. Heightened anxiety was associated with a reduced expectancy for positive events, regardless of the scenarios' current emotional valence, whereas increased age was associated with an inflated expectancy for positive events, which was strongest when individuals were processing socially relevant or negative scenarios.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02699931.2012.711743

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Cabeleira C Age differences in emotional appraisal 2010 Australia University of Western Australia (Unpublished honor’s thesis).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Steinman, S. A., Smyth, F. L., Bucks, R. S., MacLeod, C., & Teachman, B. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Virginia (US)
  • The University of Western Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
Steinman, Shari A.
Venue
Cognition & Emotion
Published
2013-02
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
345-355
ISSN
  • 0269-9931 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0600
OpenAlex
W2105231211
Cited by
27
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cognition & Emotion (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (R01AG033033)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
anxiety, expectancy bias, positivity effect, aging, future expectations, emotional valence, lifespan development, social relevance
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Anxiety, Emotions, Female, Forecasting, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review