Cited by 69Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Biases in attention and interpretation in adolescents with varying levels of anxiety and depression

Open access
Klein, Anke M., de Voogd, Leone, Wiers, Reinout W., Salemink, Elske·2018·Cognition and Emotion

Abstract

This is the first study to investigate multiple cognitive biases in adolescence simultaneously, to examine whether anxiety and depression are associated with biases in attention and interpretation, and whether these biases are able to predict unique variance in self-reported levels of anxiety and depression. A total of 681 adolescents performed a Dot Probe Task (DPT), an Emotional Visual Search Task (EVST), and an Interpretation Recognition Task. Attention and interpretation biases were significantly correlated with anxiety. Mixed results were reported with regard to depression: evidence was found for an interpretation bias, and for an attention bias as measured with the EVST but not with the DPT. Furthermore, interpretation and attention biases predicted unique variance in anxiety and depression scores. These results indicate that attention and interpretation biases are unique processes in anxiety and depression. They also suggest that anxiety and depression are partly based on similar underlying cognitive mechanisms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02699931.2017.1304359

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Klein, A. M., de Voogd, L., Wiers, R. W., & Salemink, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • Developmental Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Corresponding author
Klein, Anke M.
Venue
Cognition and Emotion
Published
2017-04-03
Volume
32
Issue
7
Pages
1478-1486
ISSN
  • 0269-9931 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0600
OpenAlex
W2526422008
Cited by
69
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3
FWCI
4.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cognition & Emotion (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development, ZonMW (200210010)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
cognitive biases, attentional bias, interpretation bias, adolescent anxiety, adolescent depression, dot-probe task
MeSH terms
Attentional Bias, Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Anxiety, Child, Depression, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review