Cited by 53Social and Intergroup PsychologyDeath Anxiety and Social ExclusionPsychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment

Motivated emotion and the rally around the flag effect: liberals are motivated to feel collective angst (like conservatives) when faced with existential threat

Porat, Roni, Tamir, Maya, Wohl, Michael J. A., Gur, Tamar, Halperin, Eran·2019·Cognition and Emotion

Abstract

A careful look at societies facing threat reveals a unique phenomenon in which liberals and conservatives react emotionally and attitudinally in a similar manner, rallying around the conservative flag. Previous research suggests that this rally effect is the result of liberals shifting in their attitudes and emotional responses toward the conservative end. Whereas theories of motivated social cognition provide a motivation-based account of cognitive processes (i.e. attitude shift), it remains unclear whether emotional shifts are, in fact, also a motivation-based process. Herein, we propose that under threat, liberals are motivated to feel existential concern about their group's future vitality (i.e. collective angst) to the same extent as conservatives, because this group-based emotion elicits support for ingroup protective action. Within the context of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, we tested and found support for this hypothesis both inside (Study 1) and outside (Study 2) the laboratory. We did so using a behavioural index of motivation to experience collective angst. We discuss the implications of our findings for understanding motivated emotion regulation in the context of intergroup threat.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02699931.2018.1460321

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Experimental studies suggest that increasing system justification motivation may, in some cases, raise the national attachment levels of people who hold liberal views so that they more closely resemble those of people who hold conservative views, thereby temporarily reducing polarization on issues of patriotism - but not nationalism.

    “Experimental studies suggest that increasing system justification motivation may, in some cases, raise the national attachment levels of people who hold liberal views so that they more closely resemble those of people who hold conservative views, thereby temporarily reducing polarization on issues of patriotism — but not nationalism, defined as an attitude of superiority towards other countries282”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 45 · Cited by 53

Authors
Porat, R., Tamir, M., Wohl, M. J. A., Gur, T., & Halperin, E.
Affiliations
  • Reichman University (IL)
  • Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
  • Carleton University (CA)
Corresponding author
Porat, Roni
Venue
Cognition and Emotion
Published
2018-04-18
Volume
33
Issue
3
Pages
480-491
ISSN
  • 0269-9931 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0600
OpenAlex
W2800663289
Cited by
53
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 1
FWCI
9.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cognition & Emotion (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada (435-2012-1135)
  • European Research Council (335607)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Keywords
rally around the flag effect, existential risk, liberals and conservatives, intergroup threat, Israeli-Palestinian conflict, motivated social cognition, emotion regulation
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Attitude, Emotions, Fear, Female, Humans, Male, Motivation, Politics, White People, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review