Cited by 65Physical Education and PedagogySports and Physical Education StudiesPhysical Education and Sports Studies

Physical Education “in All Sorts of Corners”: Student Activists Transgressing Formal Physical Education Curricular Boundaries

Enright, Eimear, O'Sullivan, Mary·2012·Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport

Abstract

The data for this paper were generated during a 3-year; participatory action research project, with 41 female coresearchers and activists ages 15-19 years old, within and beyond the walls of a secondary school. The two questions we sought to answer were (a) what happens when we engage with students to challenge formal physical education curricular boundaries and connect with students' physical culture; and (b) what are the benefits and the challenges associated with engaging in this sort of practical activism? The findings suggest that a boundary-crossing approach to physical education can facilitate students in finding their own meanings in physical education and physical activity. Supporting boundary-crossing practices is, however; a time- and thought-intensive pedagogical design, which will be challenging for many physical education teachers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02701367.2012.10599856

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Supporting boundary-crossing practices is a time- and thought-intensive pedagogical design that will be challenging for many physical education teachers.

    “Supporting bou crossing practices is a time- and thou intensive pedagogical design that will challenging for many physical educat teachers (p.255).”

    From Pedagogies of embodiment in physical education – a literature review (2022) · cites this paper as Enright & O'Sullivan, 2012

  • A boundary-crossing approach to physical education can facilitate students in finding their own meanings in physical education and physical activity.

    “A boundary-crossing approach to phy education can facilitate students in fin their own meanings in physical educa and physical activity.”

    From Pedagogies of embodiment in physical education – a literature review (2022) · cites this paper as Enright & O'Sullivan, 2012

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Enright, E., & O'Sullivan, M.
Affiliations
University of Limerick (IE)
Venue
Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport
Published
2012-06
Volume
83
Issue
2
Pages
255-267
ISSN
  • 0034-5377 (ISSN-L)
  • 0270-1367
  • 2168-3824
OpenAlex
W2075691124
Cited by
65
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
14.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Physical Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Life-span and Life-course Studies › Sports and Physical Education Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Physical Education and Sports Studies
Keywords
physical education, student activism, physical culture, high school students, participatory action research, physical activity, curriculum boundaries, teacher challenges
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Curriculum, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Physical Education and Training, Social Support, Community-Based Participatory Research, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review