The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Socioeconomic segregation in European capital cities. Increasing separation between poor and rich
Open accessAbstract
Socio-economic inequality is on the rise in major European cities as are the worries about that, since this development is seen as threatening social cohesion and stability. Surprisingly, relatively little is known about the spatial dimensions of rising socioeconomic inequality. This paper builds on a study of socio-economic segregation in twelve European cities: Amsterdam, Athens, Budapest, London, Madrid, Oslo, Prague, Riga, Stockholm, Tallinn, Vienna, and Vilnius. Data are used from national censuses and registers for the years 2001 and 2011.The main conclusion is that socio-economic segregation in Europe has grown. This paper develops a rigorous multi-factor approach to understand segregation and links it to four underlying universal, partially overlapping, structural factors: social inequalities, globalization and economic restructuring, welfare regimes, and housing systems. The paper provides an in-depth discussion of these factors to come to a better understanding of the differences between the hypothesized and actual segregation levels measured. It is suggested that introducing time-lags between structural factors and segregation outcomes improve the theoretical model.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The three worlds of welfare capitalism
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-1046 · Cited by 16,528
The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism
Hicks, A., & Esping-Andersen, G. (1991) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2073705 · Cited by 7,092
Sassen, S. (1991) · Cited by 5,382
The global city: New York, London, Tokyo
(1992) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.29-4010 · Cited by 2,814
Income Inequality and Income Segregation
Reardon, S. F., & Bischoff, K. (2011) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/657114 · Cited by 1,047
Haldane, A. G., Shanbhogue, R., Attanasio, O. P., Besley, T. J., Lindert, P. H., Piketty, T., & Ventura, J. (2015) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 763
Social and Ethnic Segregation in Europe: Levels, Causes, and Effects
Musterd, S. (2005) · Journal of Urban Affairs · doi:10.1111/j.0735-2166.2005.00239.x · Cited by 652
Self-citationFrom public housing to the social market: Rental policy strategies in comparative perspective
Kemeny, J. (1995) · Taylor & Francis eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203308554 · Cited by 571
Residential Distribution and Occupational Stratification
Duncan, O. D., & Duncan, B. (1955) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/221609 · Cited by 517
World-City Network: A New Metageography?
Beaverstock, J. V., Smith, R. G., & Taylor, P. J. (2000) · Annals of the Association of American Geographers · doi:10.1111/0004-5608.00188 · Cited by 495
Cited by
The Global Increase in the Socioeconomic Achievement Gap, 1964 to 2015
Chmielewski, A. K. (2019) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0003122419847165 · Cited by 312
Metadata
- Authors
- Musterd, S., Marcińczak, S., van Ham, M., & Tammaru, T.
- Venue
- Urban Geography
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2016-09-16
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1062-1083
- ISSN
- 0272-3638 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-2847
- OpenAlex
- W2255571663
- Cited by
- 533
- References
- 25
- FWCI
- 103.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Socioeconomic segregation in European capital cities. Increasing separation between poor and rich. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/02723638.2016.1228371
- The paper
- Musterd, S., Marcińczak, S., van Ham, M., & Tammaru, T. (2017). Socioeconomic segregation in European capital cities. Increasing separation between poor and rich. Urban Geography. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2016.1228371
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.