Cited by 263Creativity in Education and NeuroscienceDesign Education and PracticePsychological and Educational Research Studies

The Importance of Domain-Specific Expertise in Creativity

Baer, John·2015·Roeper Review

Abstract

Although creativity and expertise are related, they are nonetheless very different things. Expertise does not usually require creativity, but creativity generally does require a certain level of expertise. There are similarities in the relationships of both expertise and creativity to domains, however. Research has shown that just as expertise in one domain does not predict expertise in other, unrelated domains, creativity in one domain does not predict creativity in other, unrelated domains. People may be expert, and people may be creative, in many domains, or they may be expert, or creative, in few domains or none at all, and one cannot simply transfer expertise, or creativity, from one domain to another, unrelated domain. The domain specificity of creativity matters crucially for creativity training, creativity assessment, creativity research, and creativity theory. The domain specificity of creativity also means that interdisciplinary thinking, interdisciplinary collaboration, and interdisciplinary creativity are even more important than one would assume if creativity were domain general.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02783193.2015.1047480

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 115 · Cited by 263

Authors
Baer, J.
Affiliations
Rider University (US)
Corresponding author
Baer, John
Venue
Roeper Review
Published
2015-07-03
Volume
37
Issue
3
Pages
165-178
ISSN
  • 0278-3193 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-865X
OpenAlex
W1824447357
Cited by
263
References
115
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 5
FWCI
14.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Roeper Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Design Education and Practice
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychological and Educational Research Studies
Keywords
domain-specific expertise, creativity, creativity training, creativity assessment, creativity theory, interdisciplinary thinking, interdisciplinary collaboration, expert knowledge transfer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review