Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 86Creativity in Education and NeuroscienceEducation, Achievement, and GiftednessPsychological and Educational Research Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A comparison of the concept of overexcitabilities with measures of creativity and school achievement in sixth‐grade students

Gallagher, Shelagh A.·1985·Roeper Review
DOI 10.1080/02783198509552950
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

(1985). A comparison of the concept of overexcitabilities with measures of creativity and school achievement in sixth‐grade students. Roeper Review: Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 115-119.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02783198509552950

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 24 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Axley, F. A content analysis using Dabrowskian theory. Paper presented at the Western Social Science Conference. Albuquerque, New Mexico. April,
  2. Cropley A., 1972, Journal of Research and Development in Education, 4, 113
  3. Gallagher S., 1985, A comparison of Dabrowski's concept of overexcitabilities with measures of creativity and school achievement in sixth‐grade students
  4. Nelson J., 1963, The construction of a scale of teacher judgment of pupil creativity
  5. Silverman, L. and Ellsworth, B. The theory of positive disintegration and its implications for giftedness. Paper presented at the Third International Conference on the Theory of Positive Disintegration. November, University of Miami School of Medicine.
  6. Torrance E.P., 1963, Explorations in creative thinking in the early school IV: highly intelligent and highly creative children in a laboratory school
  7. Yamamoto K., 1963, School and Science, 91, 307

Cited by

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Gallagher, S. A.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Gallagher, Shelagh A.
ORCID
Gallagher, Shelagh A.
Venue
Roeper Review
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
1985-11
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
115-119
ISSN
  • 0278-3193 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-865X
DOI
10.1080/02783198509552950
OpenAlex
W1966957504
Cited by
86
References
24
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Roeper Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychological and Educational Research Studies
Keywords
overexcitabilities, creativity, academic performance, sixth grade students, gifted education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.