The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Particle Deposition in a Multiple-Path Model of the Human Lung
Open accessAbstract
Predicting the amount of particle deposition in the human lung following exposure to airborne particulate matter is the first step toward evaluating risks associated with exposure to airborne pollutants. Realistic deposition models are needed for accurate predictions of deposition in the lung, but a major limitation is the degree to which the lung geometry can be accurately reconstructed. Morphometric data for the entire airway tree of the human lung are not available. So far, idealistic lung structures have been used for deposition calculations. In this study, 10 statistical lung structures based on morphometric measurements of Raabe et al. (1976) were generated for the conducting airways of the human lung. A symmetric, dichotomous branching alveolar airway structure was attached to the end of the conducting airway tree of each lung structure. The total volume of the alveolar region was the same among the lung geometries. Using a mathematical scheme developed previously (Anjilvel and Asgharian 1995), regional, lobar, and per-generation depositions of particles were calculated in these geometries. The results were compared to deposition predictions using typical-path and five-lobe symmetric lung geometry models. All three lung models showed very similar regional and generation-by-generation deposition results. Lobar deposition was found to strongly depend on the detailed morphometry of the lung structure that was used.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Deposition and biokinetics of inhaled nanoparticles
Geiser, M., & Kreyling, W. G. (2010) · Particle and Fibre Toxicology · doi:10.1186/1743-8977-7-2 · Cited by 747
Regional Lung Deposition and Bronchodilator Response as a Function of β 2 -Agonist Particle Size
Usmani, O. S., Biddiscombe, M. F., & Barnes, P. J. (2005) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.200410-1414oc · Cited by 578
Health implications of nanoparticles
Kreyling, W. G., Semmler-Behnke, M., & Möller, W. (2006) · Journal of Nanoparticle Research · doi:10.1007/s11051-005-9068-z · Cited by 300
Demokritou, P., Gass, S., Pyrgiotakis, G., Cohen, J. M., Goldsmith, W., McKinney, W., Frazer, D., Ma, J., Schwegler-Berry, D., Brain, J., et al. (2013) · Nanotoxicology · doi:10.3109/17435390.2012.739665 · Cited by 152
Inhalation Exposure to Carbon Nanotubes (CNT) and Carbon Nanofibers (CNF): Methodology and Dosimetry
Oberdörster, G., Castranova, V., Asgharian, B., & Sayre, P. (2015) · Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B · doi:10.1080/10937404.2015.1051611 · Cited by 150
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Asgharian, B., Hofmann, W., & Bergmann, R.
- Venue
- Aerosol Science and Technology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2001-01
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 332-339
- ISSN
- 0278-6826 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-7388
- OpenAlex
- W2104041174
- Cited by
- 408
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Particle Deposition in a Multiple-Path Model of the Human Lung. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/02786820119122
- The paper
- Asgharian, B., Hofmann, W., & Bergmann, R. (2001). Particle Deposition in a Multiple-Path Model of the Human Lung. Aerosol Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820119122
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.