The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effect of Working Fluid on Sub-2 nm Particle Detection with a Laminar Flow Ultrafine Condensation Particle Counter
Open accessAbstract
The effect of working fluid on size-dependent activation efficiencies with the laminar flow ultrafine condensation particle counter described by CitationStolzenburg and McMurry (1991) was studied theoretically and experimentally. Criteria considered include tendency to avoid homogeneous nucleation within the condenser and toxicity. The working fluids that were identified have vapor pressures below that of butanol, so particles grow to smaller sizes and are more difficult to detect optically. Therefore we use a second, conventional CPC as a “booster” to grow particles to a detectable size. Experiments were performed to obtain the size- and material-dependent activation efficiencies for ethylene glycol, diethylene glycol, propylene glycol, oleic acid, and DOS. Using diethylene glycol and oleic acid, values of the 50% activation efficiency diameter, Dp50 , for negatively charged particles generated by evaporating sodium chloride, ammonium sulfate, and silver were < 1.2 (< 0.8) nm, 1.4–1.5 (1.0–1.2) nm, and 1.9–2.0 (1.5) nm as mobility (mass) diameter, respectively. The stability of the UCPC for long-term operation using ethylene glycol and propylene glycol as working fluids was tested by monitoring the instrument's response to silver particles having size near Dp50 in an air stream at 40–45% relative humidity. The performance was steady (±3%) for several days indicating the instrument performs stably during unattended operation for realistic atmospheric sampling conditions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The role of low-volatility organic compounds in initial particle growth in the atmosphere
Tröstl, J., Chuang, W. K., Gordon, H., Heinritzi, M., Yan, C., Molteni, U., Ahlm, L., Frege, C., Bianchi, F., Wagner, R., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature18271 · Cited by 850
Measurement of the nucleation of atmospheric aerosol particles
Kulmala, M., Petäjä, T., Nieminen, T., Sipilä, M., Manninen, H. E., Lehtipalo, K., Dal Maso, M., Aalto, P. P., Junninen, H., Paasonen, P., et al. (2012) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2012.091 · Cited by 678
Oxidation products of biogenic emissions contribute to nucleation of atmospheric particles
Riccobono, F., Schobesberger, S., Scott, C. E., Dommen, J., Ortega, I. K., Rondo, L., Almeida, J., Amorim, A., Bianchi, F., Breitenlechner, M., et al. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1243527 · Cited by 642
Causes and importance of new particle formation in the present‐day and preindustrial atmospheres
Gordon, H., Kirkby, J., Baltensperger, U., Bianchi, F., Breitenlechner, M., Curtius, J., Dias, A., Dommen, J., Donahue, N. M., Dunne, E. M., et al. (2017) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1002/2017jd026844 · Cited by 478
Particle Size Magnifier for Nano-CN Detection
Vanhanen, J., Mikkilä, J., Lehtipalo, K., Sipilä, M., Manninen, H. E., Siivola, E., Petäjä, T., & Kulmala, M. (2011) · Aerosol Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/02786826.2010.547889 · Cited by 379
Metadata
- Authors
- Iida, K., Stolzenburg, M. R., & McMurry, P. H.
- Venue
- Aerosol Science and Technology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-01
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 81-96
- ISSN
- 0278-6826 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-7388
- OpenAlex
- W2044969083
- Cited by
- 201
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of Working Fluid on Sub-2 nm Particle Detection with a Laminar Flow Ultrafine Condensation Particle Counter. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/02786820802488194
- The paper
- Iida, K., Stolzenburg, M. R., & McMurry, P. H. (2009). Effect of Working Fluid on Sub-2 nm Particle Detection with a Laminar Flow Ultrafine Condensation Particle Counter. Aerosol Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820802488194
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.