Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 598

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Towards Aerosol Light-Absorption Measurements with a 7-Wavelength Aethalometer: Evaluation with a Photoacoustic Instrument and 3-Wavelength Nephelometer

Open access
Arnott, W. Patrick, Hamasha, Khadeejeh, Moosmüller, Hans, Sheridan, Patrick J., Ogren, John A.·2005·Aerosol Science and Technology

Abstract

Two extreme cases of aerosol optics from the Reno Aerosol Optics Experiment are used to develop a model-based calibration scheme for the 7-wavelength aethalometer. The cases include those of very white and very dark aerosol samples. The former allows for an assessment of the scattering offset associated with this filter-based method, with the wavelength-dependent scattering measured from a 3-wavelength nephelometer, and interpolated and extrapolated to the 7 wavelengths of the aethalometer. A photoacoustic instrument operating at 532 nm is used to evaluate the filter loading effect caused by aerosol light absorption. Multiple scattering theory is used to analytically obtain a filter-loading correction function. This theory shows that the exponential behavior of light absorption in the strong multiple scattering limit scales as the square root of the total absorption optical depth rather than linearly with optical depth as is commonly assumed with Beer's law. The multiple scattering model also provides a theoretical justification for subtracting a small fraction of aerosol light scattering away from measured apparent light absorption by the filter method. The model is tested against ambient measurements and is found to require coefficients that are situation specific. Several hypotheses are given for this specificity, and suggested methods for reducing it are discussed. Specific findings are as follows. Simultaneous aerosol light-scattering measurements are required for accurate interpretation of aethalometer data for high aerosol single-scattering albedo. Instantaneous errors of up to ±50% are possible for uncorrected data, depending on filter loading. The aethalometer overpredicts black carbon (BC) concentration on a fresh filter and underpredicts BC on a loaded filter. BC and photoacoustic light absorption can be tightly correlated if the data are averaged over the full range of filter loadings and the aerosol source is constant. Theory predicts that the Aethalometer response may be sensitive to filter face velocity, and hence flow rate, to the extent that particle penetration depth depends on face velocity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/027868290901972

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 598

Metadata

Authors
Arnott, W. P., Hamasha, K., Moosmüller, H., Sheridan, P. J., & Ogren, J. A.
Venue
Aerosol Science and Technology
Published
2005-01
Volume
39
Issue
1
Pages
17-29
ISSN
  • 0278-6826 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-7388
OpenAlex
W2102753047
Cited by
598
References
0
FWCI
9.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Towards Aerosol Light-Absorption Measurements with a 7-Wavelength Aethalometer: Evaluation with a Photoacoustic Instrument and 3-Wavelength Nephelometer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/027868290901972
The paper
Arnott, W. P., Hamasha, K., Moosmüller, H., Sheridan, P. J., & Ogren, J. A. (2005). Towards Aerosol Light-Absorption Measurements with a 7-Wavelength Aethalometer: Evaluation with a Photoacoustic Instrument and 3-Wavelength Nephelometer. Aerosol Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/027868290901972

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.