The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Characterization and intercomparison of aerosol absorption photometers: result of two intercomparison workshops
Open accessAbstract
Abstract. Absorption photometers for real time application have been available since the 1980s, but the use of filter-based instruments to derive information on aerosol properties (absorption coefficient and black carbon, BC) is still a matter of debate. Several workshops have been conducted to investigate the performance of individual instruments over the intervening years. Two workshops with large sets of aerosol absorption photometers were conducted in 2005 and 2007. The data from these instruments were corrected using existing methods before further analysis. The inter-comparison shows a large variation between the responses to absorbing aerosol particles for different types of instruments. The unit to unit variability between instruments can be up to 30% for Particle Soot Absorption Photometers (PSAPs) and Aethalometers. Multi Angle Absorption Photometers (MAAPs) showed a variability of less than 5%. Reasons for the high variability were identified to be variations in sample flow and spot size. It was observed that different flow rates influence system performance with respect to response to absorption and instrumental noise. Measurements with non absorbing particles showed that the current corrections of a cross sensitivity to particle scattering are not sufficient. Remaining cross sensitivities were found to be a function of the total particle load on the filter. The large variation between the response to absorbing aerosol particles for different types of instruments indicates that current correction functions for absorption photometers are not adequate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kattsov, Zhao, Z., Joussaume, S., Covey, C., McAvaney, B. J., Ogana, W., & Kitoh, A. (2001) · Cited by 2,349
Radiative forcing and climate response
Hansen, J., Sato, M., & Ruedy, R. (1997) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/96jd03436 · Cited by 2,241
Ramanathan, V., Crutzen, P. J., Lelieveld, J., Mitra, A. P., Althausen, D., Anderson, J., Andreae, M. O., Cantrell, W., Cass, G. R., Chung, C. E., et al. (2001) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2001jd900133 · Cited by 1,368
Self-citationWeingartner, E., Saathoff, H., Schnaiter, M., Streit, N., Bitnar, B., & Baltensperger, U. (2003) · Journal of Aerosol Science · doi:10.1016/s0021-8502(03)00359-8 · Cited by 1,260
Self-citationHansen, A. D. A., Rosen, H., & Novakov, T. (1984) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/0048-9697(84)90265-1 · Cited by 1,081
Calibration and Intercomparison of Filter-Based Measurements of Visible Light Absorption by Aerosols
Bond, T. C., Anderson, T. L., & Campbell, D. (1999) · Aerosol Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/027868299304435 · Cited by 1,022
Determining Aerosol Radiative Properties Using the TSI 3563 Integrating Nephelometer
Anderson, T. L., & Ogren, J. A. (1998) · Aerosol Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/02786829808965551 · Cited by 896
Self-citationCharlson, R. J., Langner, J., Rodhe, H., Leovy, C. B., & Warren, S. G. (1991) · Tellus A: Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography · doi:10.3402/tellusa.v43i4.11944 · Cited by 750
Petzold, A., & Schönlinner, M. (2004) · Journal of Aerosol Science · doi:10.1016/j.jaerosci.2003.09.005 · Cited by 623
Self-citationArnott, W. P., Hamasha, K., Moosmüller, H., Sheridan, P. J., & Ogren, J. A. (2005) · Aerosol Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/027868290901972 · Cited by 598
Self-citation
Cited by
Reche, C., Querol, X., Alastuey, A., Viana, M., Pey, J., Moreno, T., Rodríguez, S., González, Y., Fernández-Camacho, R., de la Rosa, J., et al. (2011) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-11-6207-2011 · Cited by 365
Self-citationPikridas, M., Bezantakos, S., Močnik, G., Keleshis, C., Brechtel, F., Stavroulas, I., Demetriades, G., Antoniou, P., Vouterakos, P., Argyrides, M., et al. (2019) · Atmospheric Measurement Techniques · doi:10.5194/amt-12-6425-2019 · Cited by 60
Savadkoohi, M., Pandolfi, M., Favez, O., Putaud, J.-P., Eleftheriadis, K., Fiebig, M., Hopke, P. K., Laj, P., Wiedensohler, A., Alados-Arboledas, L., et al. (2024) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2024.108553 · Cited by 49
Self-citationCAMP: an instrumented platform for balloon-borne aerosol particle studies in the lower atmosphere
Pilz, C., Düsing, S., Wehner, B., Müller, T., Siebert, H., Voigtländer, J., & Lonardi, M. (2022) · Atmospheric Measurement Techniques · doi:10.5194/amt-15-6889-2022 · Cited by 20
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Müller, T., Henzing, J. S., de Leeuw, G., Wiedensohler, A., Alastuey, A., Angelov, H., Bizjak, M., Collaud Coen, M., Engström, J. E., Gruening, C., Hillamo, R., Hoffer, A., Imre, K., Ivanow, P., Jennings, G., Sun, J. Y., Kalivitis, N., Karlsson, H., Komppula, M., Laj, P., Li, S.-M., Lunder, C., Marinoni, A., Martins dos Santos, S., Moerman, M., Nowak, A., Ogren, J. A., Petzold, A., Pichon, J. M., Rodriquez, S., Sharma, S., Sheridan, P. J., Teinilä, K., Tuch, T., Viana, M., Virkkula, A., Weingartner, E., Wilhelm, R., & Wang, Y. Q.
- Venue
- Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
- Publisher
- Copernicus GmbH
- Published
- 2011-02-10
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 245-268
- ISSN
- 1867-1381 (ISSN-L)
- 1867-8548
- OpenAlex
- W2142113696
- Cited by
- 357
- References
- 42
- FWCI
- 15.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Characterization and intercomparison of aerosol absorption photometers: result of two intercomparison workshops. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5194/amt-4-245-2011
- The paper
- Müller, T., Henzing, J. S., de Leeuw, G., Wiedensohler, A., Alastuey, A., Angelov, H., Bizjak, M., Collaud Coen, M., Engström, J. E., Gruening, C., Hillamo, R., Hoffer, A., Imre, K., Ivanow, P., Jennings, G., Sun, J. Y., Kalivitis, N., Karlsson, H., Komppula, M., . . . Wang, Y. Q. (2011). Characterization and intercomparison of aerosol absorption photometers: result of two intercomparison workshops. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-245-2011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
