The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Determining Aerosol Radiative Properties Using the TSI 3563 Integrating Nephelometer
Open accessAbstract
Methods for reducing and quantifying the uncertainties in aerosol optical properties measured with the TSI 3563 integrating nephelometer are presented. For nearly all applications, the recommended calibration gases are air and CO2. By routinely characterizing the instrumental response to these gases, a diagnostic record of instrument performance can be created. This record can be used to improve measurement accuracy and quantify uncertainties due to instrumental noise and calibration drift. When measuring scattering by particles, size segregation upstream of the nephelometer at about 1 μm aerodynamic diameter greatly increases the information content of the data for two reasons: one stemming from the independence of coarse and fine particles in the atmosphere, and the second stemming from the size dependence of the nephelometer response. For many applications (e.g., extinction budget studies) it is important to correct nephelometer data for the effects of angular nonidealities. Correction factors appropriate to a broad range of sampling conditions are given herein and are shown to be constrained by the wavelength dependence of light scattering, as measured by the nephelometer. Finally, the nephelometer measurement is nondestructive, such that the sampled aerosol can be further analyzed downstream. Data from two nephelometers operated in series are used to evaluate this procedure. A small loss of super-μm particles (5–10%) is found, while the sub-μm data demonstrates measurement reproducibility within ± 1%.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Light Absorption by Carbonaceous Particles: An Investigative Review
Bond, T. C., & Bergstrom, R. W. (2006) · Aerosol Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/02786820500421521 · Cited by 2,980
Aerosol Mixing State: Measurements, Modeling, and Impacts
Riemer, N., Ault, A. P., West, M., Craig, R. L., & Curtis, J. H. (2019) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/2018rg000615 · Cited by 459
Müller, T., Henzing, J. S., de Leeuw, G., Wiedensohler, A., Alastuey, A., Angelov, H., Bizjak, M., Collaud Coen, M., Engström, J. E., Gruening, C., et al. (2011) · Atmospheric Measurement Techniques · doi:10.5194/amt-4-245-2011 · Cited by 357
Self-citationArtaxo, P., Rizzo, L. V., Brito, J. F., Barbosa, H. M. J., Arana, A., Sena, E. T., Cirino, G. G., Bastos, W., Martin, S. T., & Andreae, M. O. (2013) · Faraday Discussions · doi:10.1039/c3fd00052d · Cited by 257
Markowicz, K. M., Ritter, C., Lisok, J., Makuch, P., Stachlewska, I. S., Cappelletti, D., Mazzola, M., & Chilinski, M. T. (2017) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.06.014 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Anderson, T. L., & Ogren, J. A.
- Venue
- Aerosol Science and Technology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1998-01
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 57-69
- ISSN
- 0278-6826 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-7388
- OpenAlex
- W2044582584
- Cited by
- 896
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Determining Aerosol Radiative Properties Using the TSI 3563 Integrating Nephelometer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/02786829808965551
- The paper
- Anderson, T. L., & Ogren, J. A. (1998). Determining Aerosol Radiative Properties Using the TSI 3563 Integrating Nephelometer. Aerosol Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/02786829808965551
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.