Cited by 25HIV, Drug Use, Sexual RiskSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesOpioid Use Disorder Treatment

Injection drug users in the Midwest: an epidemiologic comparison of drug use patterns in four Ohio cities

Open access
Siegal, Harvey A., Carlson, Robert G., Wang, Jichuan, Falck, Russel S., Stephens, Richard C., Nelson, E. Don·1994·Journal of Psychoactive Drugs

Abstract

Variations in the drug use patterns of injection drug users (IDUs) can have important implications for public health efforts aimed at reducing drug abuse and the transmission of the human immunodeficiency virus. This article describes and compares the characteristics of IDUs living in four Ohio cities and compares African-American and White IDUs at a statewide level. Data from 2,001 IDUs who were recruited for the National AIDS Demonstration Research project between 1989 and 1991 in Columbus, Cleveland, Cincinnati, and Dayton were compared on a number of variables by city and by ethnicity using descriptive statistics and ANCOVA analysis. Significant differences among IDUs in the four cities exist for the use of alcohol, marijuana, cocaine, crack, heroin, speedball, other opioids, shooting gallery use, "safer" needle practices, treatment history, and self-help participation. Differences by ethnicity emerged on all variables except marijuana use, overall injection frequency, and incarceration experience. The results suggest that dramatic differences exist between African-American and White IDUs, and among IDUs in cities relatively close together, regardless of ethnicity. These findings should be considered when developing policy and programs for prevention and treatment activities targeting IDUs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02791072.1994.10472440

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Siegal, H. A., Carlson, R. G., Wang, J., Falck, R. S., Stephens, R. C., & Nelson, E. D.
Affiliations
  • Wright State University (US)
  • University of Akron (US)
  • University of Cincinnati (US)
Venue
Journal of Psychoactive Drugs
Published
1994-07
Volume
26
Issue
3
Pages
265-275
ISSN
  • 0279-1072 (ISSN-L)
  • 2159-9777
OpenAlex
W2050071459
Cited by
25
References
16
Citations by year
2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Psychoactive Drugs (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CORE Scholar (Wright State University) (submittedVersion)
  • Journal of Bioresource Management (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r18da005754-03, 5r18da005757-03, 5r18da005751-03)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R18-DA05754, R18-DA05757, R18-DA05751)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Keywords
people who inject drugs, drug use patterns, racial differences, alcohol consumption, cannabis use, cocaine use, heroin use, speedball, opioid use, shooting galleries, HIV transmission, urban comparison, Ohio cities, Columbus, Cleveland (Ohio), Cincinnati, Dayton
MeSH terms
Adult, Alcohol Drinking, Black or African American, Cocaine, Heroin, Female, Humans, Male, Marijuana Smoking, Ohio, Urban Population, Substance Abuse, Intravenous, Crack Cocaine, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review