The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Meta-Analysis of Interventions to Decrease Disruptive Classroom Behavior in Public Education Settings
Abstract
We conducted a meta-analysis of 99 studies that used interventions to decrease disruptive classroom behavior in public education settings. Due to the predominance of single-subject studies, we used the Interrupted Time Series Autocorrelation program (ITSACORR; Crosbie, 1993) which yielded a t statistic that was transformed into an effect size. A total of 223 effect sizes yielded a mean effect size of-.78, indicating that, on average, 78% of the treated students reduced their disruptive behavior compared to nontreated students. We found that studies using teacher rating scales were less likely to evidence reductions in disruptive classroom behaviors compared to studies using behavioral observation methodologies. We also found that students treated in self-contained classrooms were more likely to evidence a reduction in disruptive classroom behavior compared to students treated in regular classroom settings. With the exclusion of studies using teacher rating scales, comparison of treatment interventions showed no statistically reliable differences due to the large variability in the relative effectiveness for students treated. Overall, results indicate that interventions to reduce disruptive classroom behavior yield comparable results to other meta-analytic studies investigating the effectiveness of psychotherapy for children and adolescents. This indicates that there are efficacious treatments used in public education settings to to decrease disruptive classroom behaviors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research
Rosenthal, R. (1991) · doi:10.4135/9781412984997 · Cited by 4,635
Meta-analysis of psychotherapy outcome studies.
Smith, M. L., & Glass, G. V. (1977) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.32.9.752 · Cited by 2,154
Weisz, J. R., Weiss, B., Han, S. S., Granger, D. A., & Morton, T. (1995) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.450 · Cited by 884
Cited by
Evidence-based psychosocial treatments for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder
Pelham, W. E., & Fabiano, G. A. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology · doi:10.1080/15374410701818681 · Cited by 917
Webster‐Stratton, C., Jamila Reid, M., & Stoolmiller, M. (2008) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01861.x · Cited by 837
A meta-analysis of behavioral treatments for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder
Fabiano, G. A., Pelham, W. E., Coles, E. K., Gnagy, E. M., Chronis-Tuscano, A., & O'Connor, B. C. (2009) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2008.11.001 · Cited by 588
Webster-Stratton, C., & Taylor, T. (2001) · Prevention Science · doi:10.1023/a:1011510923900 · Cited by 585
Evidence-based Kernels: Fundamental Units of Behavioral Influence
Embry, D. D., & Biglan, A. (2008) · Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10567-008-0036-x · Cited by 396
Metadata
- Authors
- Stage, S. A., & Quiroz, D. R.
- Venue
- School Psychology Review
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1997-09-01
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 333-368
- ISSN
- 0279-6015 (ISSN-L)
- 2372-966X
- OpenAlex
- W1947478624
- Cited by
- 352
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 4.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Meta-Analysis of Interventions to Decrease Disruptive Classroom Behavior in Public Education Settings. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/02796015.1997.12085871
- The paper
- Stage, S. A., & Quiroz, D. R. (1997). A Meta-Analysis of Interventions to Decrease Disruptive Classroom Behavior in Public Education Settings. School Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.1997.12085871
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.