Meta-analysis of Grade Retention Research: Implications for Practice in the 21st Century
Abstract
Retaining a child at grade level has become increasingly popular, consistent with the emphasis on accountability and standards in elementary education. This article provides a comprehensive review of the research examining the academic and socioemotional outcomes associated with grade retention. Following a brief historical overview of previously published literature reviews, a summary of studies published between 1990 and 1999 is provided. A systematic review and meta-analysis of 20 recent studies includes: outcome variables (i.e., achievement and socioemotional adjustment), age or grade of retained population, matched or controlled for variables in analyses with comparison groups, and the overall conclusion regarding the efficacy of grade retention. Results of recent studies and this meta-analysis are consistent with past literature reviews from the 1970s and 1980s. In addition to a summary of the results, the discussion addresses the disparity between educational practice and converging research regarding grade retention and suggests directions for practice. This review encourages researchers, educational professionals, and legislators to abandon the debate regarding social promotion and grade retention in favor of a more productive course of action in the new millennium.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Strong evidence shows that retention does not improve long-term academic outcomes for students.
“despite the strong evidence that retention does not improve long-term academic outcomes for students (see [29]).”
From Using Evidence-Based Practice and Data-Based Decision Making in Inclusive Education (2021) · cites this paper as [29]
Cites
Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2015) · doi:10.4135/9781483398105 · Cited by 5,542 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Frank, K. A., Maroulis, S. J., Duong, M. Q., & Kelcey, B. M. (2013) · Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis · doi:10.3102/0162373713493129 · Cited by 406 · see citing works
Early Childhood Mental Health Consultation: Results of a Statewide Random-Controlled Evaluation
Gilliam, W. S., Maupin, A. N., & Reyes, C. R. (2016) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2016.06.006 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
School Attendance Patterns, Unmet Educational Needs, and Truancy: A Chronological Perspective
Spencer, A. M. (2009) · Remedial and Special Education · doi:10.1177/0741932508321017 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Using Evidence-Based Practice and Data-Based Decision Making in Inclusive Education
Wilcox, G., Fernandez Conde, C., & Kowbel, A. (2021) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci11030129 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
“not to retain students [28] despite the strong evidence that retention does not improve long-term academic outcomes for students (see [29]).”
Background
- Authors
- Jimerson, S. R.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
- Corresponding author
- Jimerson, Shane R.
- ORCID
- Jimerson, Shane R.
- Venue
- School Psychology Review
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2001-09-01
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 420-437
- ISSN
- 0279-6015 (ISSN-L)
- 2372-966X
- OpenAlex
- W2115528109
- Cited by
- 597
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 66 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 31
- FWCI
- 7.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- School Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
- Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Outcomes and Influences
- Keywords
- school retention, social promotion, academic performance, social-emotional adjustment, primary education, educational accountability, educational standards, teaching practice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review