Cited by 98Early Childhood Education and DevelopmentChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentBehavioral and Psychological Studies

Early Childhood Mental Health Consultation: Results of a Statewide Random-Controlled Evaluation

Open access
Gilliam, Walter S., Maupin, Angela N., Reyes, Chin R.·2016·Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective Despite recent federal recommendations calling for increased funding for early childhood mental health consultation (ECMHC) as a means to decrease preschool expulsions, no randomized-controlled evaluations of this form of intervention have been reported in the scientific literature. This study is the first attempt to isolate the effects of ECMHC for enhancing classroom quality, decreasing teacher-rated behavior problems, and decreasing the likelihood of expulsion in targeted children in early childhood classrooms. Method The sample consisted of 176 target children (3-4 years old) and 88 preschool classrooms and teachers randomly assigned to receive ECMHC through Connecticut's statewide Early Childhood Consultation Partnership (ECCP) or waitlist control treatment. Before randomization, teachers selected 2 target children in each classroom whose behaviors most prompted the request for ECCP. Evaluation measurements were collected before and after treatment, and child behavior and social skills and overall quality of the childcare environment were assessed. Hierarchical linear modeling was used to evaluate the effectiveness of ECCP and to account for the nested structure of the study design. Results Children who received ECCP had significantly lower ratings of hyperactivity, restlessness, externalizing behaviors, problem behaviors, and total problems compared with children in the control group even after controlling for gender and pretest scores. No effects were found on likelihood of expulsion and quality of childcare environment. Conclusion ECCP resulted in significant decreases across several domains of teacher-rated externalizing and problem behaviors and is a viable and potentially cost-effective means for infusing mental health services into early childhood settings. Clinical and policy implications for ECMHC are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jaac.2016.06.006

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Early childhood mental health consultation (ECMHC) has been found to significantly reduce hyperactivity, restlessness, externalizing behaviors, and problem behaviors in children under 6 years old.

    “One intervention recently studied that may be used in pre-school settings is the early childhood mental health consultation (ECMHC), which has been found to significantly lower ratings of hyperactivity, restlessness, externalizing behaviors, and problem behaviors among children under 6 years old [41–44].”
  • ECMHC is effective and is used in child care centers, Head Start/Early Head Start centers, home visiting programs, primary care settings, elementary schools from kindergarten through third grade, and community outreach programs.

    “Studies have shown that ECMHC is effective and being used across child care centers, Head Start/Early Head Start centers, home visiting programs, primary care settings, elementary schools (kindergarten through third grade), and community outreach programs [41, 45, 46, 48].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Hepburn KS, Perry DF, Shivers EM, Gilliam WS. Early childhood mental health consultation as an evidence-based practice. Zero Three. 2013;33:10-17.
  2. Brennan EM, Bradley JR, Allen MD, Perry DF, Tsega A. The evidence base for mental health consultation in early childhood settings: research synthesis and review. Paper presented at: Establishing the Evidence Base for Early Childhood Mental Health; March, 2005; Tampa, FL.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gilliam, W. S., Maupin, A. N., & Reyes, C. R.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Maupin, Angela N.
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-09
Volume
55
Issue
9
Pages
754-761
ISSN
0890-8567 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2466275575
Cited by
98
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
26.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
preschool expulsion, externalizing problems, hyperactivity, behavioral problems, classroom quality, childcare environment, Connecticut, cost-effectiveness
MeSH terms
School Teachers, Child Behavior Disorders, Child Health Services, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health Services, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Referral and Consultation, Schools

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review