The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Peer Relationships and Collaborative Learning as Contexts for Academic Enablers
Abstract
In this article it is argued that peers have the potential to provide contexts for learning that can have a profound impact on the development of students' academic enablers. Based on work on social support and belongingness, ways in which being accepted by peers can motivate students to engage in learning activities and to display socially appropriate forms of behavior are discussed. Using a Vygotskian perspective, ways are described in which peer collaborative contexts can promote academic engagement as well as provide a supportive structure for the development of specific problem-solving skills. The implications for teachers and practitioners of facilitating positive peer relationships and of using social skills training programs for developing academic enablers are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Social relationships and motivation in middle school: The role of parents, teachers, and peers.
Wentzel, K. R. (1998) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.90.2.202 · Cited by 1,828
Self-citation
Cited by
A Review of School Climate Research
Thapa, A., Cohen, J., Guffey, S., & Higgins-D’Alessandro, A. (2013) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654313483907 · Cited by 2,335
School Climate: Research, Policy, Practice, and Teacher Education
Cohen, J., Mccabe, E. M., Michelli, N. M., & Pickeral, T. (2009) · Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education · doi:10.1177/016146810911100108 · Cited by 2,049
Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the Student Engagement Instrument
Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., Kim, D., & Reschly, A. L. (2006) · Journal of School Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.002 · Cited by 1,858
Andrei, F., Mancini, G., Mazzoni, E., Russo, P. M., & Baldaro, B. (2015) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2015.07.014 · Cited by 59
Individual preparation for collaborative learning: Systematic review and synthesis
Mende, S., Proske, A., & Narciss, S. (2021) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2020.1828086 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Wentzel, K. R., & Watkins, D. E.
- Venue
- School Psychology Review
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2002-09-01
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 366-377
- ISSN
- 0279-6015 (ISSN-L)
- 2372-966X
- OpenAlex
- W1555349862
- Cited by
- 288
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Peer Relationships and Collaborative Learning as Contexts for Academic Enablers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/02796015.2002.12086161
- The paper
- Wentzel, K. R., & Watkins, D. E. (2002). Peer Relationships and Collaborative Learning as Contexts for Academic Enablers. School Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2002.12086161
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.