The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Understanding the Effects of Physical and Relational Victimization: The Utility of Multiple Perspectives in Predicting Social-Emotional Adjustment
Abstract
Current tools for assessing children's social behavior in school psychology research and practice typically do not adequately measure issues most salient for young girls (e.g., experiences of relational victimization). The relation among teacher, peer, and self-reports of relational and physical peer victimization was examined for 119 fourth grade boys (n = 58) and girls (n = 61) as part of a larger, longitudinal study. Girls were more likely to be victims of relationally aggressive acts, whereas boys were more often targets of physical victimization. Teacher reports added unique information in the prediction of social-emotional adjustment (acceptance, rejection, internalizing, and externalizing) beyond that accounted for by peer and self-reports. Teacher reports of relational victimization differentially contributed to the prediction of adjustment beyond that accounted for by physical victimization for boys and girls. The need for further research and implications of these findings is discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hawker, D. S. J., & Boulton, M. J. (2000) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/1469-7610.00629 · Cited by 2,694
Cited by
Understanding the psychology of bullying: Moving toward a social-ecological diathesis–stress model.
Swearer, S. M., & Hymel, S. (2015) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/a0038929 · Cited by 666
Update on bullying at school: Science forgotten?
Stassen Berger, K. (2007) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/j.dr.2006.08.002 · Cited by 578
Klomek, A. B., Sourander, A., & Gould, M. (2010) · The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/070674371005500503 · Cited by 485
Klomek, A. B., Sourander, A., Niemelä, S., Kumpulainen, K., Piha, J., Tamminen, T., Almqvist, F., & Gould, M. S. (2009) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/chi.0b013e318196b91f · Cited by 440
Cyber bullying behaviors among middle and high school students.
Mishna, F., Cook, C., Gadalla, T., Daciuk, J., & Solomon, S. (2010) · American Journal of Orthopsychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1939-0025.2010.01040.x · Cited by 440
Metadata
- Authors
- Cullerton-Sen, C., & Crick, N. R.
- Venue
- School Psychology Review
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-06-01
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 147-160
- ISSN
- 0279-6015 (ISSN-L)
- 2372-966X
- OpenAlex
- W2140079923
- Cited by
- 250
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Understanding the Effects of Physical and Relational Victimization: The Utility of Multiple Perspectives in Predicting Social-Emotional Adjustment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/02796015.2005.12086280
- The paper
- Cullerton-Sen, C., & Crick, N. R. (2005). Understanding the Effects of Physical and Relational Victimization: The Utility of Multiple Perspectives in Predicting Social-Emotional Adjustment. School Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2005.12086280
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
