Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 108Education Discipline and InequalityBullying, Victimization, and AggressionLegal Issues in Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Randomized Controlled Study of the Virginia Student Threat Assessment Guidelines in Kindergarten Through Grade 12

Cornell, Dewey G., Allen, Korrie, Fan, Xitao·2012·School Psychology Review

Abstract

.This randomized controlled study examined disciplinary outcomes for 201 students who made threats of violence at school. The students attended 40 schools randomly assigned to use the Virginia Student Threat Assessment Guidelines or follow a business-as-usual disciplinary approach in a control group. Logistic regression analyses found, after controlling for student gender, race, school level, and threat severity, that the 100 students in the threat assessment group schools were more likely to receive counseling services (odds ratio [OR] = 3.98) and a parent conference (OR = 2.57), and less likely to receive a long-term suspension (OR = 0.35) or alternative school placement (OR = 0.13) than the 101 students in the control group schools. Implementation fidelity was associated with decreased long-term suspension (OR = 0.73). These results provide strong empirical support for the use of student threat assessment in primary and secondary schools.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02796015.2012.12087378

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Show all 38 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Baumrind D., 1968, Adolescence, 3, 255
  2. Shih T., 2009, Adequate sample sizes for 2-level hierarchical linear modeling
  3. Van DykeR. (2008). Reliability and validity of the Dallas Threat of Violence Risk Assessment (Doctoral dissertation). Indiana State University, Terre Haute, IN.

Cited by

Items 101–108 of 108

Metadata

Authors
Cornell, D. G., Allen, K., & Fan, X.
Affiliations
  • University of Virginia (US)
  • Eastern Virginia Medical School (US)
  • University of Macau (MO)
Corresponding author
Cornell, Dewey G.
Venue
School Psychology Review
Published
2012-03-01
Volume
41
Issue
1
Pages
100-115
ISSN
  • 0279-6015 (ISSN-L)
  • 2372-966X
OpenAlex
W254830041
Cited by
106
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
39.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
School Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education Discipline and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Law › Legal Issues in Education
Keywords
school violence, student discipline, counseling services, parent-teacher conferences, implementation fidelity, threat severity, K-12 schools

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.