Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 273

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The clinical database and the treatment guidelines of the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (DBCG); its 30-years experience and future promise

Open access
Møller, Susanne, Jensen, Maj-Britt, Ejlertsen, Bent, Bjerre, Karsten D., Larsen, Martin, Hansen, Hanne B., Christiansen, Peer, Mouridsen, Henning T.·2008·Acta Oncologica

Abstract

Introduction. Since 30 years, DBCG (Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group) has maintained a clinical database allowing the conduct of quality control studies, of randomised trials, examination of the epidemiology of breast cancer and of prognostic and predictive factors. Material and methods. The original database included patients with invasive breast cancer, but has later been expanded to patients with in situ breast cancer and hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families. Results. The multidisciplinary cooperative group has provided successive treatment guidelines and 70% of the 77284 registered patients have been enrolled and received treatment according to these guidelines. The standard treatments and the randomised trials included in the DBCG programmes are all briefly described. Among high-risk patients 48% have participated in randomised trials, and the results of these trials have largely been implemented in the next generation of treatment guidelines. Records within the clinical database of archival tumour tissue have established a basis for translational research and epidemiologic research has been enabled through linkage to other healthcare registries. Discussion. The joint conception of the multidisciplinary breast cancer group and a clinical database has provided improvements in the management of breast cancer patients and has enabled recruitment of patients onto randomised trials.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02841860802059259

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 273

Metadata

Authors
Møller, S., Jensen, M.-B., Ejlertsen, B., Bjerre, K. D., Larsen, M., Hansen, H. B., Christiansen, P., & Mouridsen, H. T.
Venue
Acta Oncologica
Published
2008-01
Volume
47
Issue
4
Pages
506-524
ISSN
  • 0284-186X (ISSN-L)
  • 1651-226X
OpenAlex
W2171583319
Cited by
273
References
2
FWCI
5.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
diamond

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The clinical database and the treatment guidelines of the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (DBCG); its 30-years experience and future promise. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/02841860802059259
The paper
Møller, S., Jensen, M.-B., Ejlertsen, B., Bjerre, K. D., Larsen, M., Hansen, H. B., Christiansen, P., & Mouridsen, H. T. (2008). The clinical database and the treatment guidelines of the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (DBCG); its 30-years experience and future promise. Acta Oncologica. https://doi.org/10.1080/02841860802059259

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.