Cited by 1,759Breast Cancer Treatment StudiesEstrogen and related hormone effectsEndometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments

A Randomized Trial of Exemestane after Two to Three Years of Tamoxifen Therapy in Postmenopausal Women with Primary Breast Cancer

Open access
Coombes, R. Charles, Hall, Emma, Gibson, Lorna J., Paridaens, Robert, Jassem, Jacek, Delozier, Thierry, Jones, Stephen E., Alvarez, Isabel +17 more·2004·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tamoxifen, taken for five years, is the standard adjuvant treatment for postmenopausal women with primary, estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer. Despite this treatment, however, some patients have a relapse. METHODS: We conducted a double-blind, randomized trial to test whether, after two to three years of tamoxifen therapy, switching to exemestane was more effective than continuing tamoxifen therapy for the remainder of the five years of treatment. The primary end point was disease-free survival. RESULTS: Of the 4742 patients enrolled, 2362 were randomly assigned to switch to exemestane, and 2380 to continue to receive tamoxifen. After a median follow-up of 30.6 months, 449 first events (local or metastatic recurrence, contralateral breast cancer, or death) were reported--183 in the exemestane group and 266 in the tamoxifen group. The unadjusted hazard ratio in the exemestane group as compared with the tamoxifen group was 0.68 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.56 to 0.82; P<0.001 by the log-rank test), representing a 32 percent reduction in risk and corresponding to an absolute benefit in terms of disease-free survival of 4.7 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 2.6 to 6.8) at three years after randomization. Overall survival was not significantly different in the two groups, with 93 deaths occurring in the exemestane group and 106 in the tamoxifen group. Severe toxic effects of exemestane were rare. Contralateral breast cancer occurred in 20 patients in the tamoxifen group and 9 in the exemestane group (P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Exemestane therapy after two to three years of tamoxifen therapy significantly improved disease-free survival as compared with the standard five years of tamoxifen treatment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa040331

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. www.nejm.org march 11 , 2004 1092 exemestane versus tamoxifen after initial tamoxifen therapy for breast cancer
  2. Ali S, Coombes RC. Endocrine-respon- sive breast cancer and strategies for combat- ing resistance. Nat Rev Cancer 2002;2:101- 12.
  3. Donnellan PP, Douglas SL, Cameron DA, Leonard RC. Aromatase inhibitors and arthralgia. J Clin Oncol 2001;19:2767.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Coombes, R. C., Hall, E., Gibson, L. J., Paridaens, R., Jassem, J., Delozier, T., Jones, S. E., Alvarez, I., Bertelli, G., Ortmann, O., Coates, A. S., Bajetta, E., Dodwell, D., Coleman, R. E., Fallowfield, L. J., Mickiewicz, E., Andersen, J., Lønning, P. E., Cocconi, G., Stewart, A., Stuart, N., Snowdon, C. F., Carpentieri, M., Massimini, G., & Bliss, J. M.
Affiliations
  • Charing Cross Hospital (GB)
  • Institute of Cancer Research (GB)
  • Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven (BE)
  • Gdańsk Medical University (PL)
  • Centre François Baclesse (FR)
  • University of Regensburg (DE)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori (IT)
  • Weston Park Cancer Centre (GB)
  • University of Sussex (GB)
  • Haukeland University Hospital (NO)
  • University of Parma (IT)
  • The Christie Hospital (GB)
  • Ysbyty Gwynedd Hospital NHS Trust (GB)
  • Pfizer (Italy) (IT)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2004-03-11
Volume
350
Issue
11
Pages
1081-1092
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2163688875
Cited by
1,759
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 60 · 2014: 50 · 2013: 66 · 2012: 60
FWCI
100.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Regensburg Publication Server (University of Regensburg) (acceptedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Massachusetts Medical Society
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Estrogen and related hormone effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
Keywords
exemestane, tamoxifen, aromatase inhibitors, adjuvant endocrine therapy, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer, postmenopausal women, disease-free survival, breast cancer recurrence, contralateral breast cancer, overall survival, treatment switching
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Aged, Androstadienes, Breast Neoplasms, Double-Blind Method, Estrogen Antagonists, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Hormone-Dependent, Receptors, Estrogen, Tamoxifen, Chemotherapy, Adjuvant, Postmenopause, Disease-Free Survival, Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal, Aromatase Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review