The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The completeness of the Swedish Cancer Register – a sample survey for year 1998
Open accessAbstract
INTRODUCTION: The Swedish Cancer Register (SCR) is used extensively for monitoring cancer incidence and survival and for research purposes. Completeness and reliability of cancer registration are thus of great importance for all types of use of the cancer register. The aim of the study was to estimate the overall coverage of malignant cancer cases in 1998 and to reveal possible reasons behind non-reporting. METHODS: We selected all malignant cancer cases in the Hospital Discharge Register (HDR) from 1998 and compared these records to those reported to the SCR. There were 43,761 discharges for 42,010 individuals of whom 3,429 individuals were not recorded in the SCR. From these 3 429 records we randomly selected 202 patients for review of their medical records to determine whether they should have been registered on the SCR as incident cases in 1998. RESULTS: About half of the 202 cases (93 malignant and 8 benign) should have been reported, which translates into an additional 1 579 malignant cases (95% CI 1 349-1 808), or 3.7% of the cases reported in 1998. The crude incidence rate for males and females combined would increase from 493 per 100,000 to 511 (95% CI 508-514) if these cases were taken into account. CONCLUSION: The overall completeness of the SCR is high and comparable to other high quality registers in Northern Europe. For most uses in epidemiological or public health surveillance, the underreporting will be without major impact. However, for specific research questions our findings have implications, as the degree of underreporting is site specific, increases with age, and does not seem to be random, as diagnoses without histology or cytology verification are overrepresented. An annual comparison of the SCR against the HDR could point to hospitals, geographic areas or specific diagnoses where organizational and administrative changes should be introduced to improve reporting.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Risk of Ischemic Heart Disease in Women after Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer
Darby, S. C., Ewertz, M., McGale, P., Bennet, A. M., Blom-Goldman, U., Brønnum, D., Correa, C., Cutter, D., Gagliardi, G., Gigante, B., et al. (2013) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1209825 · Cited by 3,974
HPV Vaccination and the Risk of Invasive Cervical Cancer
Lei, J., Ploner, A., Elfström, K. M., Wang, J., Roth, A., Fang, F., Sundström, K., Dillner, J., & Sparén, P. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1917338 · Cited by 1,487
Hagström, H., Nasr, P., Ekstedt, M., Hammar, U., Stål, P., Hultcrantz, R., & Kechagias, S. (2017) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2017.07.027 · Cited by 1,067
Ludvigsson, J. F., Svedberg, P., Olén, O., Bruze, G., & Neovius, M. (2019) · European Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s10654-019-00511-8 · Cited by 1,021
Bower, H., Björkholm, M., Dickman, P. W., Höglund, M., Lambert, P. C., & Andersson, T. M.-L. (2016) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2015.66.2866 · Cited by 904
Metadata
- Authors
- Barlow, L., Westergren, K., Holmberg, L., & Talbäck, M.
- Venue
- Acta Oncologica
- Published
- 2009-01
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 27-33
- ISSN
- 0284-186X (ISSN-L)
- 1651-226X
- OpenAlex
- W2131756199
- Cited by
- 1,236
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The completeness of the Swedish Cancer Register – a sample survey for year 1998. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/02841860802247664
- The paper
- Barlow, L., Westergren, K., Holmberg, L., & Talbäck, M. (2009). The completeness of the Swedish Cancer Register – a sample survey for year 1998. Acta Oncologica. https://doi.org/10.1080/02841860802247664
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.