Cited by 42Head and Neck Cancer StudiesCOVID-19 and healthcare impactsHead and Neck Surgical Oncology

Causes for delay before specialist consultation in head and neck cancer

Open access
Nieminen, M., Aro, K., Jouhi, L., Bäck, L., Mäkitie, A., Atula, T.·2018·Acta Oncologica

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Head and neck cancers are often diagnosed at a late stage, thus resulting in a generally poor prognosis. This is partly attributable to patients' hesitancy in seeking treatment. However, the length and causes of these patient delays remain relatively unknown. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We included all new head and neck cancer patients treated at our tertiary care center between 2016 and 2017. Using a patient questionnaire, we collected data on patients' symptoms and other factors related to seeking medical care, and recorded both patient- and primary health care-related delays. We then compared the data collected from these patients to patient and tumor characteristics collected from hospital records, and analyzed various causes for delay before a specialist consultation to the Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery. RESULTS: Among the patients (n = 142) in our study, the median patient delay was 35 d with 73% of patients seeking medical care within 3 months. In comparison, the median primary health-care delay was 20 d. Certain symptoms influenced patient delay. Hoarseness and breathing difficulties correlated with longer patient delay while patients with a lump on the neck had a shorter delay. Patient delay was associated with certain tumor-related factors such as the tumor site and the presence of regional metastases, which resulted in shorter patient delay. None of the patient-related factors appeared to impact delay. Important factors influencing primary health-care delay included the initial location visited and whether any follow-up visit was scheduled or not. CONCLUSIONS: Although most patients sought medical advice without a major delay and were adequately referred, we found that long delays existed. Raising awareness of the symptoms of head and neck cancer among general population and health-care providers is probably the best way to get patients to curative treatment without delay.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/0284186x.2018.1497297

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • At different stages of illness, patients' experiences of bodily sensations and symptoms vary, thus affecting their psychological responses.

    “At diferent stages of the illness, patients' experiences of bodily sensations and symptoms vary [43], thus afecting their psychological responses.”

    From Symptom Experiences before Medical Help-Seeking and Psychosocial Responses of Patients with Esophageal Cancer: A Qualitative Study. (2023) · cites this paper as [43]

    The Discussion (page not supplied) says patients may experience symptoms and their intensity differently, supporting variation in symptom experience. It does not establish that this variation occurs at different stages of illness or that it affects psychological responses; the outcome it discusses is delay in seeking medical care. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nieminen, M., Aro, K., Jouhi, L., Bäck, L., Mäkitie, A., & Atula, T.
Affiliations
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
  • Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
Corresponding author
Aro, K.
Venue
Acta Oncologica
Published
2018-08-24
Volume
57
Issue
12
Pages
1677-1686
ISSN
  • 0284-186X (ISSN-L)
  • 1651-226X
OpenAlex
W2888249333
Cited by
42
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Acta Oncologica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion)
  • Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Head and Neck Cancer Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Head and Neck Surgical Oncology
Keywords
head and neck cancer, patient delay, expert consultation, hoarseness, dyspnea, neck mass, regional metastases, tumor location, early diagnosis, health-seeking behavior, symptom awareness
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Finland, Head and Neck Neoplasms, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Primary Health Care, Referral and Consultation, Time Factors, Cohort Studies, Young Adult, Time-to-Treatment, Tertiary Care Centers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review