Cited by 23Stoma care and complicationsCancer survivorship and careColorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments

Systematic review of the impact of demographic and socioeconomic factors on quality of life in ostomized colorectal cancer survivors

Open access
Kristensen, Helle Ø, Thyø, Anne, Christensen, Peter·2019·Acta Oncologica

Abstract

Background: Formation of a fecal stoma may be necessary to ensure radical resection in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients but will substantially impact the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in about 20% of cases. Little is known about patient-related risk factors for reduced HRQoL in patients with a permanent stoma. We, therefore, reviewed the current literature on how demographic and socioeconomic factors affect HRQoL in CRC survivors with a stoma.Material and methods: The databases Pubmed, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycINFO were systematically searched. Two independent reviewers extracted and quality-assessed eligible publications. Studies assessing HRQoL using a validated questionnaire at least 6 months after surgery for CRC were included if data on the impact of demographic and/or socioeconomic, factors on HRQoL were analyzed and presented.Results: Eligible studies predominantly presented small cross-sectional cohorts. Age showed equivocal results; hence, some studies found younger patients had inferior HRQoL compared with older patients, and others found no difference. Subdivision into age groups differed widely. Several studies found that both generic and stoma-specific HRQoL was lower in females compared with males. Most studies found that socioeconomic factors did not affect HRQoL while one study found lower education correlated to reduced HRQoL. Categorization of these factors also varied widely.Conclusions: This is to our knowledge the first systematic review on the impact of patient-related factors on HRQoL in long-term CRC survivors. We found that a stoma had more impact in younger ostomates than older and that HRQoL in females was reduced more than in males. Conclusions regarding other factors were difficult due to few studies and contradictory results. Further research in this subject is much needed in order to target preventive measures when planning surgery in patients in high risk of reduced HRQoL.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/0284186x.2018.1557785

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Son et al. reportaron que, para la mayoría de los estudios, el efecto de las intervenciones psicosociales sobre la CdV no resultó ser estadísticamente significativo.

    “Son et al. (23) realizaron un meta-análisis con el objetivo de identificar la efectividad de las intervenciones psicosociales sobre la CdV en pacientes con CCR, reportando que, para la mayoría de los estudios, el efecto de las intervenciones psicosociales sobre la CdV no resultó ser estadísticamente significativo”

    From Efecto de intervenciones psicológicas sobre variables psicosociales en pacientes con cáncer colorrectal: una revisión narrativa de la literatura. (2022) · cites this paper as [23]

    The cited paper’s Material and methods section explicitly says that variation among the included studies made a meta-analysis impossible, contrary to the citing sentence’s description of it as a meta-analysis. Its Results and Discussion concern demographic and socioeconomic factors in ostomized colorectal cancer survivors, not the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions; the claimed finding about statistical significance is not reported. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Son et al. detectaron leves mejoras en la CdV en todos los grupos de intervención.

    “sin embargo, se detectaron leves mejoras en la CdV en todos los grupos de intervención.”

    From Efecto de intervenciones psicológicas sobre variables psicosociales en pacientes con cáncer colorrectal: una revisión narrativa de la literatura. (2022) · cites this paper as [23]

    The Results (page unavailable) describe studies of demographic and socioeconomic factors affecting quality of life in ostomized colorectal cancer survivors, not improvements across intervention groups. Searches for Son and for quality-of-life improvements in intervention groups found no passage addressing the claimed finding. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, et al. The European organ- ization for research and treatment for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993;85:365-376.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kristensen, H. Ø., Thyø, A., & Christensen, P.
Affiliations
Aarhus University Hospital (DK)
Corresponding author
Kristensen, Helle Ø
Venue
Acta Oncologica
Published
2019-01-30
Volume
58
Issue
5
Pages
566-572
ISSN
  • 0284-186X (ISSN-L)
  • 1651-226X
OpenAlex
W2914519264
Cited by
23
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Acta Oncologica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Stoma care and complications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Keywords
colorectal cancer, ostomy, health-related quality of life, colorectal cancer survivors, demographic factors, socioeconomic factors, age, sex differences, educational attainment, risk factors
MeSH terms
Cancer Survivors, Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Ostomy, Quality of Life, Socioeconomic Factors, Colorectal Neoplasms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review