Cited by 27Student Assessment and FeedbackEducational and Psychological AssessmentsEducational Assessment and Improvement

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An exploration of teachers' narratives: what are the facilitators and constraints which promote or inhibit ‘good’ formative assessment practices in schools?

Sach, Elizabeth·2015·Education 3-13

Abstract

This paper set out to explore teachers' narratives in order to understand some of the facilitators and constraints which promote or inhibit good formative assessment practices in schools. A ‘responsive interview’ approach was used to probe a small sample of lower and middle school teachers' perceptions of formative assessment. Qualitative thematic analysis of data identified four key themes which had important implications for pedagogical practice. These were: prescription and ownership; accountability; school context, culture and collaboration; and leadership and management. Evidence from this study suggests that, while teachers may recognise the value of formative assessment in promoting learning, conflicts and tensions between government policies and school practices may inhibit its effectiveness.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/03004279.2013.813956

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. 10.1080/03004270903099819 · DOI
  2. Biggam J, 2008, Succeeding with Your Master's Dissertation
  3. Black P, 1998, Testing: Friend or Foe? Theory and Practice of Assessment and Testing
  4. Black P., 2005, Assessment for Learning: Putting it into Practice
  5. Bransford J. D., 1999, How People Learn
  6. British Psychological Society, 2000, Code of Conduct, Ethical Principles and Guidelines
  7. Bruner J, 1996, The Culture of Education, 10.4159/9780674251083 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Cheminais R, 2009, Effective Multi-Agency Partnerships, 10.12968/eyed.2009.11.3.42743 · DOI
  9. Clarke S, 2001, Unlocking Formative Assessment: Practical Strategies for Enhancing Pupils’ Learning in the Primary Classroom
  10. DCSF, 2009, Lamb Inquiry: Special Educational Needs and Parental Confidence
  11. Department for Education, 2010, The Equality Act
  12. Department for Education, 2010, The Importance of Teaching: Schools White Paper
  13. Department for Education and Skills (DfES), 2001, Special Educational Needs Code of Practice
  14. Department for Education and Skills (DfES, 2004, Every Child Matters: Next Steps
  15. Department for Education and Skills (DfES, 2004, Removing Barriers to Achievement: The Government's Strategy for SEN
  16. Department for Education and Skills (DfES, 2004, Assessment for Learning: KS3 National Strategy Guidance for Senior Leaders
  17. Dweck C. S., 2000, Self Theories: Their Role in Motivation, Personality and Development
  18. Fullan M, 2001, Leading in a Culture of Change
  19. 10.1111/j.1754-8845.1993.tb01112.x · DOI
  20. Hayes N, 2000, Foundations of Psychology
  21. House of Commons, 2009, School Accountability
  22. House of Commons Children, Schools and Families Committee, 2008, Testing and Assessment
  23. 10.1080/13632430902775509 · DOI
  24. Kvale S, 1996, Interviews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing
  25. 10.1080/13540600903057237 · DOI
  26. Pollard A.,, 1996, The Social World of Children's Learning
  27. 10.1177/0013161X11417126 · DOI
  28. Rubin H. J., 2005, Quantitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data, 10.4135/9781452226651 · DOI
  29. 10.1080/03055698.2011.598684 · DOI
  30. 10.1080/13540602.2011.539802 · DOI
  31. 10.1080/13664530.2011.571500 · DOI
  32. Torrance H., 1998, Investigating Formative Assessment: Teaching, Learning and Assessment in the Classroom
  33. Vygotsky L. S., 1978, Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Order Psychological Processes
  34. 10.1080/03055690802476800 · DOI
  35. Warnock M, 1978, Report of the Committee of Enquiry into the Education of Handicapped Children and Young People
  36. 10.4135/9781446219454.n1 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 27

Metadata

Authors
Sach, E.
Affiliations
University of Bedfordshire (GB)
Corresponding author
Sach, Elizabeth
Venue
Education 3-13
Published
2013-07-02
Volume
43
Issue
3
Pages
322-335
ISSN
  • 0300-4279 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-7575
OpenAlex
W1986873900
Cited by
27
References
4
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
3.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Education 3-13 (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational and Psychological Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Assessment and Improvement
Keywords
formative assessment, teacher perceptions, teacher narratives, school accountability, school culture, teacher collaboration, educational leadership, school management, public policy, teaching practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review