Cited by 106Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and TherapiesRetirement, Disability, and EmploymentMedical Practices and Rehabilitation

Work disability in rheumatoid arthritis is predicted by physical and psychological health status: a 7‐year study from the Oslo RA register

Ødegård, S., Finset, A., Kvien, T. K., Mowinckel, P., Uhlig, T.·2005·Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore the prevalence of work disability (WD) and to identify bio-psychological factors that predicts future WD in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) over a 7-year period. METHODS: Patients were selected from the Oslo RA register. The prevalence of WD was studied cross-sectionally among respondents <67 years (n = 526) in a postal survey. Mean age (SD) was 51.1 (11.9) years, mean disease duration 11.3 (9.4) years, and 49% of patients were RF-positive. The patients studied for predictive factors for WD were respondents in postal surveys both at baseline and at the 7-year follow-up, in work at baseline and still in working age (<67 years) at follow-up (n = 159). Mean age at baseline (SD) was 44.5 (9.7) years, mean disease duration 8.4 (6.6) years, mean years of formal education 12.7 (3.1) years, 48% were RF-positive. Assessments included socio-demographic variables and health status measures (MHAQ, AIMS2, SF-36, fatigue and pain on VAS 0-100 mm, self efficacy, and RAI as a measure for helplessness). RESULTS: Among the 526 respondents at baseline <67 years, the prevalence of WD was 40%. A high level of education was a predictor of reduced risk of work disability [odds ratio (OR) = 0.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.1; 0.9], while female gender (OR 3.0, 95% CI 1.1; 8.0), physical disability (MHAQ-score) (OR = 3.9, 95% CI 1.2; 12.5) and helplessness over median RAI-score (OR = 3.0, 95% CI 1.4; 6.7) were independent predictors of increased risk for new work disability over 7 years. CONCLUSION: Physical disability, increased helplessness, low formal education, and female gender were found to be independent risk factors for new work disability over the 7-year study period.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/03009740510018633

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ødegård, S., Finset, A., Kvien, T. K., Mowinckel, P., & Uhlig, T.
Affiliations
  • Diakonhjemmet Hospital (NO)
  • University of Oslo (NO)
Corresponding author
Ødegård, S.
Venue
Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology
Published
2005-12-31
Volume
34
Issue
6
Pages
441-447
ISSN
  • 0300-9742 (ISSN-L)
  • 1502-7732
OpenAlex
W2149598860
Cited by
106
References
48
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 8
FWCI
2.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Retirement, Disability, and Employment
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
Keywords
rheumatoid arthritis, work disability, disability prediction, physical disability, helplessness, mental health, educational attainment, gender differences, fatigue, pain, self-efficacy, risk factors
MeSH terms
Adult, Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Cross-Sectional Studies, Disability Evaluation, Female, Health Status, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Norway, Surveys and Questionnaires, Registries, Severity of Illness Index, Socioeconomic Factors, Prevalence, Antirheumatic Agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review