The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Tracking the development of adiposity from one month of age to adulthood
Open accessAbstract
The development of adiposity was followed in 164 subjects from the age of one month to adulthood. The 25th and 75th centiles of the weight/height2 (W/H2) index were chosen as cut-off points to define the lean, medium and fat subjects at both one and 21 years of age. Only 42% of the children remained in their original category, that is 41% of the lean infants at one year stayed lean, 42% of the medium infants stayed medium and 41% of the fat infants stayed fat. Accordingly, most fat infants did not stay fat, but twice as many fat as non-fat infants became fat adults (41 and 20% respectively). The relative risk of being fat adults was 1 for the lean, 1 for the medium and 2 for the fat infants at one year. Several paths of development emerged: they were related to age at the second rise in adiposity, termed adiposity rebound, which usually occurs at about six years, as observed on skinfold thickness and W/H2 charts. The earlier the rebound, the higher the adiposity at adult age, whether this was measured by W/H2 index or subscapular skinfold. The cohorts of children who left the channel they had been following included fat infants with a late rebound who subsequently returned to normal, and lean infants with an early rebound who grew fatter. Other cohorts remained in their original groups, for example, fat infants with an early rebound who stayed fat and lean infants with a late one who stayed lean. Age at rebound provided two indications: the existence of a regulartory process among the transiently fat or lean infants who returned to average after a late or early rebound respectively, and pathological development among the children who became fat or lean after an early or late rebound. Age at rebound is an indicator of the subsequent development of fatness.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Developmental Origins of Adult Disease
Barker, D. J. P. (2004) · Journal of the American College of Nutrition · doi:10.1080/07315724.2004.10719428 · Cited by 1,854
The worldwide obesity epidemic
James, P. T., Leach, R., Kalamara, E., & Shayeghi, M. (2001) · Obesity Research · doi:10.1038/oby.2001.123 · Cited by 1,201
Being big or growing fast: systematic review of size and growth in infancy and later obesity
Baird, J., Fisher, D., Lucas, P., Kleijnen, J., Roberts, H., & Law, C. (2005) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.38586.411273.e0 · Cited by 1,185
Flynn, M. A. T., McNeil, D. A., Maloff, B., Mutasingwa, D., Wu, M., Ford, C., & Tough, S. C. (2006) · Obesity Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1467-789x.2006.00242.x · Cited by 925
The developmental origins of chronic adult disease
Barker, D. (2004) · Acta Paediatrica · doi:10.1111/j.1651-2227.2004.tb00236.x · Cited by 790
Metadata
- Authors
- Rolland-Cachera, M.-F., Deheeger, M., Guilloud-Bataille, M., Avons, P., Patois, E., & Sempé, M.
- Venue
- Annals of Human Biology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1987-01
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 219-229
- ISSN
- 0301-4460 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-5033
- OpenAlex
- W2063058707
- Cited by
- 354
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tracking the development of adiposity from one month of age to adulthood. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/03014468700008991
- The paper
- Rolland-Cachera, M.-F., Deheeger, M., Guilloud-Bataille, M., Avons, P., Patois, E., & Sempé, M. (1987). Tracking the development of adiposity from one month of age to adulthood. Annals of Human Biology. https://doi.org/10.1080/03014468700008991
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.