Cited by 14Avian ecology and behaviorAnimal Ecology and Behavior StudiesAnimal Behavior and Reproduction

Is the breeding behaviour of nesting seabirds influenced by the presence of a predatory reptile—the tuatara?

Open access
Corkery, I, Bell, BD, Nelson, NJ·2015·Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand

Abstract

Increasing our knowledge of the costs and benefits associated with commensal interactions is necessary both for a better understanding of how ecological communities are structured and for determining conservation actions. We investigated the concomitant use of a burrow by a nesting seabird, the fairy prion ( Pachyptila turtur ), and a medium‐sized predatory reptile, the tuatara ( Sphenodon punctatus ). Arrival time of fairy prions at the burrow each night was found to be delayed by the presence of a tuatara at the burrow. Use of the burrow by tuatara almost halved the time fairy prions spent at the burrow with their chick. The effect of this cohabitation on each species can be expected to change over both space and time, i.e. with changes in population densities and season. Hence it is possible that in newly established colonies of birds with low numbers in the presence of tuatara, tuatara predation may have a deleterious impact.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/03036758.2014.999690

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Even in locations where predation does not cause serious reductions in population, the presence of native predators can result in shifts in nest attendance, changes to socialization and breeding behavior, and costly physiological stress responses.

    “Even in locations where predation does not cause serious reductions in population, the presence of native predators can result in shifts in nest attendance (Corkery et al. 2015; Marsteller et al. 2024), changes to socialization and breeding behavior (Mougeot and Bretagnolle 2000), and costly physiological stress responses (Schaefer and Colombelli‐Négrel 2021; Geldart et al. 2023).”

    From River Otter Predation of Nesting Seabirds Along the Coasts of North America (2025) · cites this paper as Corkery et al. 2015

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Akaike H 1978. A Bayesian analysis of the minimum AIC procedure. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics 30: 9-14.
  2. Anderson D, Burnham K, White G 1998. Comparison of Akaike information criterion and consistent Akaike information criterion for model selection and statistical inference from capture-recapture studies. Journal of Applied Statistics 25: 263-282.
  3. Bradley J, Wooller R, Skira I, Serventy D 1990. The influence of mate retention and divorce upon repro- ductive success in short-tailed shearwaters Puffinus tenuirostris. Journal of Animal Ecology 59: 487-496.
  4. Crook IG 1974. Are tuataras dependent on petrels? Wildlife: A Review 5: 43-46.
  5. Crook IG 1975. The tuatara. In: Kuschel G ed. Bio- geography and ecology in New Zealand. Department of Internal Affairs Wildlife Publication No. 167. The Hague, The Netherlands, Dr W Junk, BV Publishers. Pp. 331-352.
  6. Craig, ED 2010. Takapourewa titiwainui (fairy prion; Pachyptila turtur): how nest site selection affects breeding success, with applications for transloca- tion. Unpublished MSc thesis. Dunedin, University of Otago.
  7. Dawbin WH 1982. The Tuatara, Sphenodon punctatus (Reptilia: Rhynchocephalia): a review. In: Newman DG ed. New Zealand herpetology. Wellington, New Zealand Wildlife Service. Pp. 149-181.
  8. Jones IL, Gaston AJ, Falls JB 1990. Factors affecting colony attendance by ancient murrelets (Synthli- boramphus antiquus). Canadian Journal of Zoology 68: 433-441.
  9. King CM 1989. The advantages and disadvantages of small size to weasels, Mustela species. In: Gittleman JL ed. Carnivore behavior, ecology, and evolution. New York, Cornell University Press. Pp. 302-334.
  10. Markwell TJ 1997. Video camera count of burrow- dwelling fairy prions, sooty shearwaters, and tuatara on Takapourewa (Stephens Island), New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 24: 231-237.
  11. Moore J, Daugherty C, Godfrey S, Nelson N 2009. Seasonal monogamy and multiple paternity in a wild population of a territorial reptile (tuatara). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 98: 161-170.
  12. Newman DG 1978. Tuataras and petrels. Wildlife: A Review 9: 16-23.
  13. Newman DG 1982. Tuatara, Sphenodon punctatus, and burrows, Stephens Island. In: Newman DG ed. New Zealand herpetology. Wellington, New Zealand Wildlife Service. Pp. 213-223.
  14. Ramstad KM, Nelson NJ, Paine G, Beech D, Paul A, Paul P et al. 2007. Maori traditional ecological knowledge complements science in conservation of tuatara (Sphenodon). New Zealand Journal of Zoology 34: 269-270.
  15. Saint Girons H, Bell BD, Newman DG 1980. Observa- tions on the activity and thermoregulation of the tuatara, Sphenodon punctatus (Reptilia: Rhyncho- cephalia), on Stephens Island. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 7: 551-556.
  16. Walls GY 1978. The influence of the tuatara on fairy prion breeding on Stephens Island, Cook Strait. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 1: 91-98.
  17. Walls GY 1981. Feeding ecology of the tuatara (Sphenodon punctatus) on Stephens Island, Cook Strait. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 4: 89-97.
  18. Walls GY 1983. Activity of the tuatara and its relation- ships to weather conditions on Stephens Island, Cook Strait, with observations on geckos and invertebrates. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 10: 309-318.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Corkery, I., Bell, B., & Nelson, N.
Affiliations
  • University College Cork (IE)
  • Victoria University of Wellington (NZ)
  • Allan Wilson Centre for Molecular Ecology and Evolution School of Biological Sciences Victoria University of Wellington Wellington New Zealand
Corresponding author
Corkery, I
Venue
Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-02-23
Volume
45
Issue
1
Pages
21-30
ISSN
  • 0303-6758 (ISSN-L)
  • 1175-8899
OpenAlex
W2053814729
Cited by
14
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Allan Wilson Centre
  • University of Victoria
  • Victoria University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Keywords
tuatara, Sphenodon punctatus, fairy prion, seabird nesting, burrow use, predator-prey interactions, reproductive behavior, time of arrival, seabird colonies, New Zealand

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review