The Use of Research to Improve Professional Practice: a systematic review of the literature
Abstract
In a keynote address to the Teacher Training Agency Annual Conference, Professor David Hargreaves suggested that teaching could become an evidence-based profession if educational researchers were made more accountable to teachers. This systematic literature review set out to explore: how teachers use research; which features of research encourage teachers to use research findings in their own practice; whether medical practitioners make greater use of research findings than teachers; and approaches to dissemination. Two key ideas emerge from this review. First, there appear to be common barriers to research use in both medicine and in education. Findings suggest that there is a need to create a culture in the public sector which supports and values research. There are, however, a number of factors, which appear to be more specific to the education field. Key differences in the way that research knowledge is constructed in the social sciences has led to researchers being challenged about their findings, particularly in relation to the context, generalisability and validity of the research. For these reasons the development of communication networks, links between researchers and practitioners, and greater involvement of practitioners in the research process, have emerged as strategies for improving research impact.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Across public sector human service organizations, those with a strong focus on development of new knowledge and understanding of best practices, as well as incentives to adopt best practices, are likely well poised to explore appropriate practices and implementation strategies.
“Across public sector human service organizations, those with a strong focus on development of new knowledge and understanding of best practices (i.e., “learning organizations,” (Senge 2006), as well as incentives to adopt best practices are likely well poised to explore appropriate practices and implementation strategies”
From Advancing a Conceptual Model of Evidence-Based Practice Implementation in Public Service Sectors (2011) · cites this paper as Hemsley-Brown and Sharp 2003
Cites
The relevance of systematic reviews to educational policy and practice
Davies, P. (2000) · Oxford Review of Education · doi:10.1080/713688543 · Cited by 286 · see citing works
Integration or dichotomy of teaching and research? A case study of primary initial teacher educators
Murray, J. (1998) · Teachers and Teaching · doi:10.1080/1354060980040109 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Advancing a Conceptual Model of Evidence-Based Practice Implementation in Public Service Sectors
Aarons, G. A., Hurlburt, M., & Horwitz, S. M. (2011) · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10488-010-0327-7 · Cited by 3,240 · see citing works
- Authors
- HEMSLEY-BROWN, J., & SHARP, C.
- Affiliations
- National Foundation for Educational Research (GB)
- Venue
- Oxford Review of Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2003-12
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 449-471
- ISSN
- 0305-4985 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-3915
- OpenAlex
- W2134795844
- Cited by
- 360
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 1.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford Review of Education (publishedVersion)
- Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Educational Assessment and Improvement
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Research and Methods
- Keywords
- evidence-based practice, research dissemination, barriers to research use, research-practice collaboration, research accountability, research impact, research validity, physicians, practitioner involvement in research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review