The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Educational standards and the changing discourse on education: the reception and consequences of the PISA study in Germany
Abstract
This paper examines the ways in which the results of the OECD Programme of International Student Assessment (PISA) have influenced educational discourse in Germany. It argues that the results caused shockwaves in the educational landscape and led to a re‐evaluation of other international comparisons which had presented an unfavourable picture of education in Germany. The paper outlines three main areas affected by the reception of the PISA study in Germany: political discourse, curriculum development processes and academic discourse on education. Changes in the political discourse resulted in a wide‐ranging reform agenda, with the introduction of national educational standards being the most significant of a number of initiatives and programmes. In terms of curriculum development processes, the paper argues that PISA has led to the growing importance of principles such as outcome control, competence orientation and external assessment. The post‐PISA academic discourse in Germany can be characterised by the re‐orientation of educational studies towards a greater emphasis on the empirical research of pedagogic practice (empirische Unterrichtsforschung). All three areas of change are informed by more or less systematic comparisons with educational structures in other countries and, therefore, it is argued that PISA has contributed to a rediscovery of comparative education in the German discourse.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Intergenerational Class Mobility in Three Western European Societies: England, France and Sweden
Erikson, R., Goldthorpe, J. H., & Portocarero, L. (1979) · The British Journal of Sociology · doi:10.2307/589632 · Cited by 1,311
Familiäre Lebensverhältnisse, Bildungsbeteiligung und Kompetenzerwerb
Baumert, J., & Schümer, G. (2001) · PISA 2000 · doi:10.1007/978-3-322-83412-6_10 · Cited by 482
Zur Entwicklung nationaler Bildungsstandards. Eine Expertise
Klieme, E., Avenarius, H., Blum, W. F., Döbrich, P., Gruber, H. G., Prenzel, M., Reiss, K. M., Riquarts, K., Rost, J., Tenorth, H., et al. (2003) · Pedocs (German Institute for International Educational Research) · doi:10.25656/01:20901 · Cited by 413
PISA 2000 — Ein differenzierter Blick auf die Länder der Bundesrepublik Deutschland
(2003) · VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-322-97590-4 · Cited by 183
Cited by
Hopfenbeck, T. N., Lenkeit, J., El Masri, Y., Cantrell, K., Ryan, J., & Baird, J.-A. (2018) · Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1080/00313831.2016.1258726 · Cited by 283
(2012) · OECD Education Working Papers · doi:10.1787/5k9fdfqffr28-en · Cited by 269
The changing nature of autonomy: Transformations of the late Swedish teaching profession
Wermke, W., & Forsberg, E. (2017) · Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1080/00313831.2015.1119727 · Cited by 67
Inadequacies in the SES–Achievement model: Evidence from PISA and other studies
Marks, G. N., & O'Connell, M. (2021) · Review of Education · doi:10.1002/rev3.3293 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Ertl, H.
- Venue
- Oxford Review of Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2006-11
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 619-634
- ISSN
- 0305-4985 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-3915
- OpenAlex
- W2033893574
- Cited by
- 291
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 26.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Educational standards and the changing discourse on education: the reception and consequences of the PISA study in Germany. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/03054980600976320
- The paper
- Ertl, H. (2006). Educational standards and the changing discourse on education: the reception and consequences of the PISA study in Germany. Oxford Review of Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054980600976320
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.