Cited by 4Teacher Education and Leadership StudiesReflective Practices in EducationAdult and Continuing Education Topics

Rhetorics of professional change: assembling the means to act differently?

Reeves, Jenny, I’Anson, John·2014·Oxford Review of Education

Abstract

In an earlier study of learning on a practice-based postgraduate programme participants indicated that certain artefacts were critically important in enabling them to gain ‘permission’ to act differently in their schools. Picking up on this suggestion, this study begins to explore how looking at the composition of texts by teachers as a rhetorical activity raises questions about power and relations in professional learning processes. The role of artefacts in relation to professional learning is explored here by examining how teachers on a practice-based Chartered Teacher (CT) programme in Scotland constructed accounts, in the form of reflective reports and portfolios of evidence, that legitimated their practice and learning on the course. It explores how these teachers drew upon a variety of texts to construct rhetorics suited to the specific audiences and contexts they needed to address with these artefacts. The paper argues that taking this deconstructive approach to the analysis of such accounts draws attention to their micro-political significance. Potentially they provide a means whereby teachers may rehearse arguments and shape narratives that may be used to support claims to agency in their school settings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/03054985.2014.963541

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reeves, J., & I’Anson, J.
Affiliations
University of Stirling (GB)
Corresponding author
Reeves, Jenny
Venue
Oxford Review of Education
Published
2014-09-03
Volume
40
Issue
5
Pages
649-666
ISSN
  • 0305-4985 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-3915
OpenAlex
W2083390162
Cited by
4
References
0
Citations by year
2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
1.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Oxford Review of Education (publishedVersion)
  • Stirling Online Research Repository (University of Stirling) (submittedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Reflective Practices in Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Adult and Continuing Education Topics
Keywords
teacher learning, rhetoric, artifacts, reflective practice, reflective reports, power relations, agency, micropolitics, narrative, postgraduate teacher education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review