Rhetorics of professional change: assembling the means to act differently?
Abstract
In an earlier study of learning on a practice-based postgraduate programme participants indicated that certain artefacts were critically important in enabling them to gain ‘permission’ to act differently in their schools. Picking up on this suggestion, this study begins to explore how looking at the composition of texts by teachers as a rhetorical activity raises questions about power and relations in professional learning processes. The role of artefacts in relation to professional learning is explored here by examining how teachers on a practice-based Chartered Teacher (CT) programme in Scotland constructed accounts, in the form of reflective reports and portfolios of evidence, that legitimated their practice and learning on the course. It explores how these teachers drew upon a variety of texts to construct rhetorics suited to the specific audiences and contexts they needed to address with these artefacts. The paper argues that taking this deconstructive approach to the analysis of such accounts draws attention to their micro-political significance. Potentially they provide a means whereby teachers may rehearse arguments and shape narratives that may be used to support claims to agency in their school settings.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Reeves and I'Anson (2014) describe teachers using others' academic discourse as an affordance for their own agency.
“Reeves and I'Anson (2014) touch on a similar area when they describe teachers using others' academic discourse as an affordance for their own agency.”
From Teacher agency and professional learning communities; what can Learning Rounds in Scotland teach us? (2017) · cites this paper as Reeves and I'Anson (2014)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Teacher agency and professional learning communities; what can Learning Rounds in Scotland teach us?
Philpott, C., & Oates, C. (2017) · Professional Development in Education · doi:10.1080/19415257.2016.1180316 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
- Authors
- Reeves, J., & I’Anson, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Stirling (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Reeves, Jenny
- Venue
- Oxford Review of Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2014-09-03
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 649-666
- ISSN
- 0305-4985 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-3915
- OpenAlex
- W2083390162
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 1.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford Review of Education (publishedVersion)
- Stirling Online Research Repository (University of Stirling) (submittedVersion)
- ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › Reflective Practices in Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Adult and Continuing Education Topics
- Keywords
- teacher learning, rhetoric, artifacts, reflective practice, reflective reports, power relations, agency, micropolitics, narrative, postgraduate teacher education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review