Cited by 84Teacher Education and Leadership StudiesEvaluation of Teaching PracticesInnovative Education and Learning Practices

Teacher agency and professional learning communities; what can Learning Rounds in Scotland teach us?

Open access
Philpott, Carey, Oates, Catriona·2017·Professional Development in Education

Abstract

Recently there has been growth in researching teacher agency. Some research has considered the relationship between teacher agency and professional learning. Similarly, there has been growing interest in professional learning communities as resources for professional learning. Connections have been made between professional learning communities and teacher agency, with professional learning communities seen as an affordance for the exercise of teacher agency. However, it has also been argued that there is little detailed evidence of what happens inside professional learning communities or of teacher agency in action. The research reported here focuses on a form of professional learning community from Scotland: Learning Rounds. It uses data from transcripts of post-classroom observation conversations to consider the extent to which Learning Rounds provide an affordance for teacher agency and the extent to which that affordance is utilised. This research makes a contribution in three ways: adding to an empirical understanding of what happens in professional learning communities; understanding how teacher agency is (or is not) exercised in practice; and considering what factors might affect the utilisation (or otherwise) of affordances for teacher agency. The article concludes with several recommendations for developing effective professional learning communities as an affordance for teacher agency.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This study analyses transcripts of post-observation debrief conversations from four Scottish Learning Rounds to examine whether Learning Rounds afford practical-evaluative teacher agency and whether teachers use that affordance. It finds little evidence of agency in three schools, linked to absent explicit theories of action, audit-like observation, and lack of alternative discourses, while one school showed nascent fine-grained pupil-focused observation that did not challenge practice.

Key findings

  • In three of the four schools studied (Schools B, C and D), there was scant evidence in the transcripts that Learning Rounds were being utilised as an affordance for teacher agency; this was attributed to no explicit theory of action, an implicit acceptance of externally produced models of good practice, and slippage into “audit” or “ticking off” prescribed strategies.
  • None of the groups of teachers explicitly articulated a theory of action during discussion; this resulted in an implicit theory of action that could not be challenged and became a “finished” theory of action, which City et al (2009, p.53) argue “ceases to function as a learning tool and it becomes a symbolic artefact, useful primarily as a tool for legitimising … authority.”
  • Constraints included observing what the teacher was doing more than what pupils were doing, recording in molar units (e.g. “peer assessment happened”), and large numbers of observation foci leading to an audit approach rather than sustained detailed consideration of a single focus.
  • In School A, there were emerging examples of teachers observing the effects of teachers’ actions by focusing on pupils’ responses in detail and making relatively fine-grained distinctions, but these insights did not feed back into challenging or refining a theory of action because no theory of action was explicitly articulated, and they tended to peter out and return to an audit approach.

Methods

  • Four Learning Rounds post-observation debriefing discussions were audio recorded and transcribed by Author 2; the discussions took place in four different schools, each in a different local authority, and each discussion was about an hour long.
  • The schools were chosen as both a convenience sample and a purposive sample: convenience because they were known to be carrying out Learning Rounds at the time, and purposive because they represented four different Local Authorities and were therefore more likely to present a wider picture of practice.
  • Transcripts were read through iteratively by both authors (initially separately and then together) and analysed to identify what the teachers involved had observed, what they were discussing, and how they were discussing it, with particular alertness to the extent to which key features of Instructional and Learning Rounds were evident.

Limitations

  • The paper states: “Limitations of space mean findings from the data will only be summarised here,” with a more detailed presentation and discussion of the data found in Author 1 and Author 2 (2015).
  • Evident from the text: the study draws on only four post-observation debrief discussions, each about an hour long, from a convenience and purposive sample of four schools in four local authorities, limiting the basis for generalisation.
  • Evident from the text: the analysis focuses on transcripts of post-observation debriefing discussions rather than the full Learning Rounds process or observation records, and Table 1 is referenced but not included in the provided text, so school and participant details cannot be verified from this text.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/19415257.2016.1180316

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

7 of 66 cited sources checked · 6 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Findingcitation
    § Findings · p. 11

    Most of the recurring foci grouped around techniques associated with assessment for learning.

    “Most of the recurring foci grouped around techniques associated with assessment for learning (Wiliam 2011)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wiliam 2011 source
  • Premisecitation
    § Discussion · p. 16

    As long as the goals and measure of success are set by others and teachers are held to account in relation to these, the scope for teacher agency will be limited.

    “As long as the goals and measure of success are set by others and teachers are held to account in relation to these, the scope for teacher agency will be limited.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Priestley et al (2012) source
    • cites Biesta (2004) source
  • Premisecitation
    § Discussion · p. 14

    The Scottish teachers in Biesta, Priestley and Robinson's (2015) research had a very similar set of views about teaching, learning and education more broadly, even though they were from diverse locations and sectors.

    “Biesta, Priestley and Robinson (2015) report that the Scottish teachers in their research had a very similar set of views about teaching, learning and education more broadly, even though they were from diverse locations and sectors.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Biesta, Priestley and Robinson (2015) source
  • Premisecitation
    § Discussion · p. 14

    Biesta, Priestley and Robinson (2015) report a similar experience in their research on teacher agency.

    “Biesta, Priestley and Robinson (2015) report a similar experience in their research on teacher agency.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Biesta, Priestley and Robinson (2015) source
  • Findingown data
    § Findings · p. 11

    All four schools were making use of agreed foci for observations.

    “All four schools were making use of agreed foci for observations (see table 1)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 43
  • May combine two claims. 19
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Discussion · p. 16

    Biesta, Priestley and Robinson (2015) point to a lack of discourses among teachers that constructs education in terms other than technical-rational concerns of efficiency to include questions of purpose and value.

    “Likewise Biesta, Priestley and Robinson (2015) point to a lack of discourses among teachers that constructs education in terms other than the technical-rational concerns of 'efficiency' to include questions of purpose and value.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Biesta, Priestley and Robinson (2015) source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § Discussion · p. 16

    Van der Heijden et al (2015) argue that teachers need to be risk takers if they are going to exercise agency.

    “Van der Heijden et al (2015) argue that teachers need to be risk takers if they are going to exercise agency and in the context of high stakes accountability the force of this can be seen.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Van der Heijden et al (2015) source

      The available passages identify the paper as concerning teachers as change agents, but contain no discussion of risk-taking or its relationship to teacher agency. Searches for “risk takers,” “risk,” and “agency” returned only bibliographic material, so the attributed argument cannot be verified from our copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § Discussion · p. 16

    Priestley et al (2012) cite Biesta (2004) to argue that accountability is more of a constraint on teacher agency than the prescription of means.

    “Priestley et al (2012) cite Biesta (2004) to argue that accountability is more of a constraint on teacher agency than the prescription of means.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Priestley et al (2012) source
    • cites Biesta (2004) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Findings · p. 12

    In school A, these insights did not feed back into challenging or refining a theory of action as a theory of action was never explicitly articulated.

    “However, in school A these insights did not feed back into challenging or refining a theory of action as a theory of action was never explicitly articulated.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Findings · p. 11

    The foci for all schools were multiple, with some having a long list of different foci for the same observation.

    “The foci for all schools were multiple, with some having a long list of different foci for the same observation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Findings · p. 11

    The observation foci of the four schools overlapped and some foci recurred in all schools.

    “The observation foci of the four schools overlapped and some foci recurred in all schools.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § Discussion · p. 15

    Guidance on Learning Rounds makes no reference to the value of external sources of understanding, and these were not apparent in the examples of Learning Rounds recorded in this research.

    “However, guidance on Learning Rounds (National CPD team 2011) makes no reference to the value of these and they were not apparent in the examples of Learning Rounds recorded in this research.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites National CPD team 2011

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning
    § Discussion · p. 13

    In the teacher observations, there was a lack of attention to the effects of teacher actions on pupils' learning, linked to the absence of an explicitly articulated theory of action.

    “The other constraint linked to the absence of an explicitly articulated theory of action is the lack of attention in the teacher observations to the effects of teacher actions on pupils' learning.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § Discussion · p. 18

    In Scotland most teachers were given a single training event or accessed online materials with no training.

    “In contrast, in Scotland most teachers were given a single training event or accessed online materials with no training.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Author 1 and Author 2 (2015)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Introduction · p. 6

    Creating the right sociocultural context for teacher agency does not guarantee that teachers will utilise its resources and affordances.

    “a risk of foregrounding features of the sociocultural context that are conducive to the exercise of agency is that we might slip into believing that if we create the right sociocultural context for teacher agency, teachers will utilise its resources and affordances, at least in ways consistent with their own personal disposition and capacity. However, this might not be the case.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract · p. 3

    Connections have been made between professional learning communities and teacher agency, with professional learning communities seen as an affordance for the exercise of teacher agency.

    “Connections have been made between professional learning communities and teacher agency, with professional learning communities seen as an affordance for the exercise of teacher agency.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Masuda 2010 source
    • cites Lipponen & Kumpalainen 2011 source
    • cites Riveros, Newton & Burgess 2012

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Introduction · p. 5

    The practical-evaluative element of agency has been left strikingly undertheorized.

    “Emirbayer and Mische (1998, p. 971) note that the practical-evaluative element of agency 'has been left strikingly undertheorized'.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Emirbayer & Mische 1998 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § Introduction · p. 4

    Emirbayer and Mische's (1998) conceptualisation of agency has been the single most frequently adopted in this work.

    “Emirbayer and Mische's (1998) conceptualisation of agency has been the single most frequently adopted in this work.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Emirbayer & Mische 1998 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Findings · p. 11

    The Learning Rounds Toolkit emphasises agreeing a focus for observation rather than developing a problem of practice.

    “it is worth remembering that the Learning Rounds Toolkit emphasises agreeing a focus for observation rather than developing a problem of practice.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites National CPD Team 2011

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § Introduction · p. 4

    For Emirbayer and Mische, agency involves the interplay of a chordal triad of the iterational, projective and practical-evaluative elements.

    “For Emirbayer and Mische, agency involves the interplay of what they term a chordal triad of the iterational element, the projective element and the practical-evaluative element of agency.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Emirbayer & Mische 1998 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § Findings · p. 12

    The implicit nature of the theory of action meant that it could not be challenged and became a finished theory of action that functions as a tool for legitimising authority.

    “Arguably the implicit nature of this theory of action mean that it could not be challenged and, therefore became a finished theory of action which in the words of City at al (2009, p.53) 'ceases to function as a learning tool and it becomes a symbolic artefact, useful primarily as a tool for legitimising … authority'; in this case, the authority of whoever had mandated the practices.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites City et al 2009

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Discussion · p. 13

    Explicitly articulating a theory of action would have made it available to scrutiny, which would have provided an affordance for teacher agency through evaluation of that theory.

    “Explicitly articulating a theory of action would have made it available to scrutiny, which would have provided an affordance for teacher agency through evaluation of that theory.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Teacher agency is desirable and should be developed.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation
    § Method · p. 11

    The four schools were chosen as a convenience sample because they were known to be carrying out learning rounds at the time, and as a purposive sample because they represented four different Local Authorities and were more likely to present a wider picture of practice than a single Local Authority.

    “Each school was in a different local authority and they were chosen both because they were a convenience sample (Walliman and Buckler 2008) and a purposive sample (Jupp 2006). A convenience sample because they were known to be carrying out learning rounds at the time that were able to gather the data and a purposive sample because they represented four different Local Authorities and were, there”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Walliman and Buckler 2008

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Jupp 2006 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Learning Rounds, Instructional Rounds and the Scottish Context · p. 10

    Learning Rounds can be seen, in potential at least, as an important affordance for teacher agency.

    “As such Learning Rounds can be seen, in potential at least, as an important affordance for teacher agency.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Learning Rounds is a form of professional learning community.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Learning Rounds, Instructional Rounds and the Scottish Context · p. 10

    The Learning Rounds Overview Report 2008-2011 provides a generalised account of progress and supports with 'vox populi' quotes but does not include detailed data on nature of actual learning rounds practices in Scottish schools and local authorities.

    “The Learning Rounds Overview Report 2008-2011 (Education Scotland 2011) provides a generalised account of the progress of learning rounds in Scotland and supports this with 'vox populi' quotes from participants. However, it does not include any detailed data on the nature of the actual learning rounds practices found in Scottish schools and local authorities .”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Education Scotland 2011

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § Discussion · p. 13

    The authority of teacher expertise is underutilized in educational change.

    “Vongalis-Macrow (2007) claims that the authority of teacher expertise is underutilized in educational change.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Vongalis-Macrow (2007) source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § Discussion · p. 15

    Bridwell-Mitchell (2015) argues that the right balance of cohesion and diversity in a community is necessary for practical-evaluative agency to be exercised.

    “Bridwell-Mitchell (2015) argues that the right balance of cohesion and, importantly, diversity in a community is necessary for practical-evaluative agency to be exercised.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bridwell-Mitchell (2015) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Learning Rounds, Instructional Rounds and the Scottish Context · p. 9

    The Scottish Executive stated that Curriculum for Excellence aims to engage teachers in thinking from first principles about their educational aims and values and their classroom practice, and that the process is based upon evidence of how change can be brought about successfully through a climate in which practitioners share and develop ideas.

    “aims to engage teacher in thinking from first principles about their educational aims and values and their classroom practice. The process is based upon evidence of how change can be brought about successfully - through a climate in which practitioners share and develop ideas (Scottish Executive 2006, p.4)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Scottish Executive 2006

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Discussion · p. 15

    The careful and considered inclusion of people likely to have alternative experiences and perspectives could enhance the possibilities for agency in Learning Rounds and professional learning communities.

    “The careful and considered inclusion of people who are likely to have alternative experiences and perspectives could enhance the possibilities for agency.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § Discussion · p. 16

    Although Learning Rounds look to be a valuable affordance for teacher agency, as long as they are used in the service of achieving goals set and 'measured' by others, that agency will be constrained.

    “So although Learning Rounds look to be a valuable affordance for teacher agency, as long as they are used in the service of achieving goals set and 'measured' by others, that agency will be constrained.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Discussion · p. 13

    Practitioner research can provide an affordance for agency because it can give teachers an authoritative basis for their views.

    “McNicholl (2013) argues that practitioner research can provide an affordance for agency as it can give teachers an authoritative basis for their views.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites McNicholl (2013) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Discussion · p. 14

    This discourse provides the landscape in which teachers have to frame their actions daily and is the primary resource for talking and thinking about practice.

    “This discourse provides the landscape in which they have to frame their actions in a daily basis and, therefore, the primary resource for talking and thinking about practice.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Discussion · p. 15

    Bridwell-Mitchell (2015) argues others' research can provide alternative repertoires.

    “Similarly Bridwell-Mitchell (2015) argues others' research can provide alternative repertoires and Biesta and Tedder (2007, p.11) write about 'manoeuvre amongst repertoires'.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bridwell-Mitchell (2015) source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § Discussion · p. 16

    Edwards (2015) cautions that Learning Rounds may only be affordances for weak evaluation.

    “As Edwards (2015) cautions they may only be affordances for weak evaluation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Edwards (2015) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Discussion · p. 16

    Riveros, Newton and Burgess (2012) suggest that professional learning communities tend to trivialise the notion of teacher practice because the theorization of what teacher practice is is under-developed.

    “Similarly, Riveros, Newton and Burgess (2012) suggest that professional learning communities tend to trivialise the notion of teacher practice because the theorization of what teacher practice is (including scope, in our view) is under-developed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Riveros, Newton and Burgess (2012)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Discussion · p. 13

    Robust empirical evidence can provide authority to teachers' views.

    “Robust empirical evidence can provide this authority.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Discussion · p. 16

    Pyhältö, Pietarinen and Soini (2014) argue that a central challenge for teachers is to broaden the scope of their perceived educational expertise beyond technical details to include larger issues such as goals and purposes of education.

    “Pyhältö, Pietarinen and Soini (2014, p.309) argue that a 'central challenge' for teachers is to broaden the scope of their perceived educational expertise beyond the technical details of classroom interactions to include larger issues such as the goals and purposes of education.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Pyhältö, Pietarinen and Soini (2014)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Learning Rounds, Instructional Rounds and the Scottish Context · p. 7

    Learning Rounds has received national policy endorsement and has been popular with schools, teachers and Local Authorities.

    “As a form of professional development Learning Rounds has received national policy endorsement (Scottish Government 2010a; 2010b; 2012; 2013; National CPD Team 2011; Education Scotland 2011) and has been popular with schools, teachers and Local Authorities.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Scottish Government 2010a

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Scottish Government 2010b

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Scottish Government 2012

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Discussion · p. 15

    Inclusion of other medical professionals in medical rounds would give alternative and broader conceptualisations of patients' needs.

    “It is suggested that the inclusion of other medical professionals in the process would give alternative and broader conceptualisations of patients' needs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Weinholtz 1991 source
    • cites Birtwistle, Houghton & Rostill 2000 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Learning Rounds, Instructional Rounds and the Scottish Context · p. 9

    Curriculum for Excellence is intended to be less prescriptive than earlier Scottish curricula and this lack of prescription is intended to provide space for practitioners to develop practice through the exercise of their own agency.

    “The recently introduced curriculum, Curriculum for Excellence (Scottish Executive 2004) is intended to be less prescriptive than earlier Scottish curricula and this lack of prescription is intended to provide space for practitioners to develop practice through the exercise of their own agency.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Scottish Executive 2004

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Discussion · p. 16

    This is evaluation only of the effectiveness of certain means to achieve ends given by others.

    “This is evaluation only of the effectiveness of certain means to achieve ends given by others.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Learning Rounds, Instructional Rounds and the Scottish Context · p. 7

    An Education Scotland report estimated that 24 out of 32 Local Authorities had engaged in Learning Rounds.

    “An Education Scotland report (Education Scotland 2011) estimated that 24 (out of 32) Local Authorities had engaged in Learning Rounds.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Education Scotland 2011

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Discussion · p. 16

    Buchanan (2015) cites Hargreaves (2000) to suggest teachers have become postprofessionals who implement decisions made by others.

    “In the same vein, Buchanan (2015) cites Hargreaves (2000) to suggest teachers have become postprofessionals who implement decisions made by others.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Buchanan (2015) source
    • cites Hargreaves (2000) source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § Discussion · p. 15

    Biesta et al (2015) identify the absence of alternative discourses as a problem for teacher agency.

    “Biesta at al (2015) identify the absence of alternative discourses as a problem for teacher agency.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Biesta at al (2015)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Discussion · p. 14

    Explicitly articulating a theory of action would have opened up the possibility of alternative discourses once the initial discourse had been explicitly surfaced rather than being invisible and possibly normalised.

    “In one sense, explicitly articulating a theory of action would have opened up the possibility of alternative discourses once the initial discourse had been explicitly surfaced rather than being invisible and, therefore, possibly normalised.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Discussion · p. 15

    Reeves and I'Anson (2014) describe teachers using others' academic discourse as an affordance for their own agency.

    “Reeves and I'Anson (2014) touch on a similar area when they describe teachers using others' academic discourse as an affordance for their own agency.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Reeves and I'Anson (2014) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Discussion · p. 16

    Vongalis-Macrow (2007) identifies a diminution of aspects of teacher agency related to authority and autonomy and an increase of obligations which restricts teachers' agency narrowly to decisions about techniques for teaching and learning in the classroom.

    “Vongalis-Macrow (2007, p.436), similarly identifies a 'diminution' of the aspects of teacher agency related to authority and autonomy and the increase of obligations which restricts teachers' agency narrowly to decisions about techniques for teaching and learning in the classroom.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Vongalis-Macrow (2007) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Premisecitation
    § Discussion · p. 13

    Social capital comes from being recognised within a community as someone whose ideas have value.

    “Social capital comes from being recognised within a community as someone whose ideas have value.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Learning Rounds, Instructional Rounds and the Scottish Context · p. 9

    The Learning Rounds Toolkit includes references to a 'plan of action' emerging from post observation stage that relates to Instructional Rounds emphasis on a theory of action, but this is a plan and not a theory so it could become a set of actions to be carried out rather than a developed understanding of cause and effect.

    “The Learning Rounds Toolkit (National CPD Team 2011) includes references to the importance of a 'plan of action' (National CPD Team 2011, p.9) emerging from the post observation stage that relates to Instructional Rounds emphasis on a theory of action. However, it may be worth noting that this is a plan and not a theory so it could become a set of actions to be carried out rather than a developed”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites National CPD Team 2011

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation
    § Discussion · p. 17

    In the case of Learning Rounds, this dialectical interplay with identities could be related to whether teachers see themselves as generators of knowledge and policy rather than implementers.

    “In the case of Learning Rounds this dialectical interplay with identities could be related to whether teachers see themselves as generators of knowledge and policy rather than implementers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § Discussion · p. 17

    This lack of ownership of purpose reduces the ability to evaluate the success of the practice and make informed revisions to it, and is itself a constraint on agency.

    “This lack of ownership of purpose, which among its effects reduces the ability to evaluate the success of the practice and make informed revisions to it, is itself an constraint on agency.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Discussion · p. 17

    Ketelaar et al (2012) identify the importance of clarity about the 'goals and means' of an innovation.

    “As part of ownership Ketelaar et al (2012) also identify the importance of clarity about the 'goals and means' (p.280) of an innovation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ketelaar et al (2012) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Discussion · p. 17

    Stillman and Anderson (2015) write about the 'dialectical interplay' between identities and engagement with policy.

    “They write about the 'dialectical interplay' (ibid, p.722) between identities and engagement with policy.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Stillman and Anderson (2015) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Conclusion and Implications · p. 20

    We cannot rely on the PLC process to effect changes in agency without seeking to develop identity and its associated agency in other ways too.

    “we cannot rely on the PLC process to effect changes in agency without seeking to develop identity and its associated agency in other ways too.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The Learning Rounds studied are representative of Learning Rounds in Scotland and, by extension, many professional learning communities.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Discussion · p. 17

    This will affect how they make use of the possibilities of Learning Rounds as affordances.

    “This will affect how they make use of the possibilities of Learning Rounds as affordances.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § Discussion · p. 18

    Pyhältö Pietarinen and Soini (2014) research suggests that agency could be developed through sustained collaborative engagement between teachers and academics.

    “A similar situation was found by Pyhältö Pietarinen and Soini (2014) whose research suggests that agency could be developed through sustained collaborative engagement between teachers and academics.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Pyhältö Pietarinen and Soini (2014)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationcitation
    § Discussion · p. 18

    Author and Author 2 conclude that Learning Rounds could be enhanced through longer engagement between teachers and proponents of Learning Rounds as an affordance for teacher agency.

    “Author and Author 2 conclude that Learning Rounds could be enhanced through longer engagement between teachers and proponents of Learning Rounds as an affordance for teacher agency.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Author and Author 2

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Discussion · p. 17

    It also relates to whether they see themselves as generators of purpose and value in education as well as technical classroom procedures.

    “It also relates to whether they see themselves as generators of purpose and value in education as well as technical classroom procedures.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Discussion · p. 17

    Appropriation involves identification with the policy rather than just carrying it out.

    “Appropriation involves identification with the policy rather than just carrying it out.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Stillman and Anderson (2015) source
54 of 54
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Learning Rounds is a form of professional learning community.

    “The research reported here focuses on a form of professional learning community that has recently been popular in Scotland: Learning Rounds.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Post-observation debriefing discussions are a sufficient site for observing teacher agency.

    “For this research four Learning Round post-observation debriefing discussions were audio recorded and then transcribed (by Author 2).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Teacher agency is desirable and should be developed.

    “The paper concludes with several recommendations for developing effective professional learning communities as an affordance for teacher agency.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The Learning Rounds studied are representative of Learning Rounds in Scotland and, by extension, many professional learning communities.

    “The data discussed here suggest that, in their current form, Learning Rounds (and by extension many professional learning communities) are technical-rationalist in that, at best, they focus on 'what works' in technical terms rather than asking broader questions about the nature and purpose of education and the identities of those involved.”
4 of 4

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. 10.1111/edth.2004.54.issue-3 · DOI
  2. Scottish Executive, 2004. A curriculum for excellence: the curriculum review group. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.
  3. Scottish Executive, 2006. A curriculum for excellence: progress and proposals. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.
  4. Scottish Government, 2010a. Teaching scotland’s future. Edinburgh: Scottish Government.
  5. Scottish Government, 2010b. Leading change 2: learning from schools of ambition. Edinburgh: Scottish Government.
  6. Scottish Government, 2012. The framework for educational leadership in scotland. Edinburgh: Scottish Government.
  7. Scottish Government, 2013. The ICT in excellence group final report. Edinburgh: Scottish Government.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Philpott, C., & Oates, C.
Affiliations
  • Leeds Beckett University (GB)
  • University of the West of Scotland (GB)
Corresponding author
Philpott, Carey
Venue
Professional Development in Education
Published
2016-05-18
Volume
43
Issue
3
Pages
318-333
ISSN
  • 1941-5257 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-5265
OpenAlex
W2396441752
Cited by
84
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1
FWCI
38.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Professional Development in Education (publishedVersion)
  • The UWS Academic Portal (University of the West of Scotland) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Leeds Beckett Repository (Leeds Beckett University) (submittedVersion)
  • Queen Margaret University Publications Repository (Queen Margaret University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Innovative Education and Learning Practices
Keywords
teacher agency, professional learning communities, professional learning, affordances, teacher professional development, Scotland

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-12.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-12.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review