Cited by 107Gender, Sexuality, and EducationEducation, Achievement, and GiftednessEducational Environments and Student Outcomes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Does the gender of the teacher really matter? Seven‐ to eight‐year‐olds’ accounts of their interactions with their teachers

Open access

Abstract

In recent years, policy‐makers in England, Australia and other countries have called for measures to increase male recruitment to the teaching profession, particularly to the primary sector. This policy of targeted recruitment is predicated upon a number of unexamined assumptions about the benefits of matching teachers and pupils by gender. For example, it is held that the dearth of male ‘role models’ in schools continues to have an adverse effect on boys’ academic motivation and engagement. Utilizing data from interviews with more than 300 7‐ to 8‐year‐olds attending primary schools in the north‐east and south‐east of England, the paper sets out to scrutinize these claims. The findings revealed that the gender of teachers had little apparent effect on the academic motivation and engagement of either boys or girls. For the majority of the children, the gender of the teacher was largely immaterial. They valued teachers, whether men or women, who were consistent and even‐handed and supportive of them as learners.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/03055690701423580

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It is not only a teacher's gender but also a teacher's non-gendered human qualities such as fairness and kindness that are most relevant to students' learning.

    “I argue that it is not only a teacher's gender but also a teacher's non-gendered human qualities such as fairness and kindness that are most relevant to students' learning.”

    From Not Just for Boys: Good Pedagogy is Good for All (2014) · cites this paper as Carrington et al., 2007

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. Arnot M., 1999, Closing the gender gap?
  2. Ashley M., 2003, Women teaching boys
  3. 2004, Revised ethical guidelines for educational research
  4. Bryman A., 2001, Social research methods
  5. Cameron C., 1999, Men in the nursery
  6. Carrington B., 2002, Journal of Research in Education, 12, 40
  7. 10.1080/0305569022000003735 · DOI
  8. 10.1080/0305569930190202 · DOI
  9. 10.1080/02680930305573 · DOI
  10. Carrington B., 2005, Teacher: Australian Council for Educational Research, 32
  11. Christensen P., 2000, Research with children
  12. Clark A., 2005, Beyond listening: children’s perspectives on early childhood services, 10.2307/j.ctt1t89j0f · DOI
  13. Davies B., 1989, Frogs and snails and feminist tales
  14. 10.4324/9780203464342 · DOI
  15. 10.2307/2524781 · DOI
  16. Francis B., 2000, Boys, girls and achievement: addressing the classroom issues
  17. 10.1080/14681810120041689 · DOI
  18. 10.4324/9780203412923 · DOI
  19. Francis B., Research Papers in Education
  20. Gurian M., 2002, Boys and girls learn differently
  21. Hutchings M., 2002, From victims of change to agents of change: the future of the teaching profession
  22. James A., 1997, Constructing and reconstructing childhood: contemporary issues in the study of childhood
  23. 10.1080/02680930210158302 · DOI
  24. Jeffrey B., 1997, Children and their curriculum
  25. King J., 2000, Masculinities at school
  26. Lewis A., 2000, Researching children’s perspectives
  27. Lingard B., 2002, Addressing the educational needs of boys—strategies for schools and teachers
  28. Lloyd B., 1992, Gender identities and education
  29. Majors R., 2001, Educating our black children
  30. Martin A. J., 2005, Australian Journal of Education, 49, 320, 10.1177/000494410504900308 · DOI
  31. 10.1080/0142569042000216990 · DOI
  32. Morgan C., 1999, Good teaching and learning: pupils and teachers speak
  33. Noble C., 2002, Getting it right—for boys and girls
  34. Scott J., 2000, Research with children
  35. 10.1080/09620210200200084 · DOI
  36. Sokal L., 2005, Male reading teachers: effects on inner‐city boys

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Carrington, B., Francis, B., Hutchings, M., Skelton, C., Read, B., & Hall, I.
Affiliations
  • University of Glasgow (GB)
  • University of Roehampton (GB)
  • London Metropolitan University (GB)
  • Newcastle University (GB)
Corresponding author
Carrington, Bruce
Venue
Educational Studies
Published
2007-12
Volume
33
Issue
4
Pages
397-413
ISSN
  • 0305-5698 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-3400
OpenAlex
W2082102251
Cited by
107
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
FWCI
15.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Educational Studies (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Sexuality, and Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
Keywords
teacher gender, elementary school students, children's perceptions of teachers, academic motivation, student engagement, gender matching, teacher role models, teacher-child relationship

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review