Cited by 16

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

An Agricultural Strategy without Farmers: Egypt’s Countryside in the New Millennium

Bush, Ray·2000·Review of African Political Economy

Abstract

This article argues that Egypt's countryside is at a turning point. The economic reforms have not delivered the intended improvements in production and yet there is little indication that the Government of Egypt (GoE) will manage to work with the IFIs to promote an alternative economic adjustment. The reforms began in Egypt's agricultural sector in the mid‐1980s and were eventually matched in 1991 by an economic reform and structural adjustment programme (ERSAP) and a renewed programme with the IFIs in 1996. Macro‐economic targets set by the IFIs have helped stabilise the economy, reduce government expenditure, inflation and budget deficits although large scale privatisation of state assets have failed to emerge and so too has significant economic growth (Pfeifer, 1999; Mitchell, 1999). Attention has particularly focused on price and marketing reforms in agriculture, on the slashing of subsidies and on the promotion of cash crops for export. Land reform, favouring landowners and marginalising tenant interests, has also been central to agricultural transformation. Sustained and diverse economic growth has eluded Egypt's economy. Unemployment remains a central problem exacerbated by the economic reforms as levels of rural and urban poverty have also risen.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/03056240008704457

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. 1990, Peasant Politics in Modern Egypt: the Struggle against the State
  2. R Bush, 1999, Economic Crisis and the Politics of Reform in Egypt
  3. Cleaver, 1994, Reversing the Spiral
  4. P. Dasgupta, 1993, An Inquiry into Wellbeing and Destitution
  5. M Desai, 1992, ‘Population and Poverty in Africa’, African Development Review, 4, 63, 10.1111/j.1467-8268.1992.tb00138.x · DOI
  6. 1993, Sustainable Agriculture in Egypt
  7. 1996, Egypt's Agriculture in a Reform Era
  8. 1996, Egypt: Human Development Report
  9. Kienle, 1998, ‘More than a Response to Islamism: The Political Deliberalisation of Egypt in the 1990s’, Middle East Journal, 52, 219
  10. T. Mitchell, 1999, ‘No Factories, No Problems: The Logic of Neo‐Liberalism in Egypt’, in Review of African Political Economy, 26, 455, 10.1080/03056249908704412 · DOI
  11. K Pfeiffer, 1999, ‘Parameters of Economic Reform in North Africa’, Review of African Political Economy, 26, 441, 10.1080/03056249908704411 · DOI
  12. M. Redclift, 1992, ‘Sustainable development and global environmental change, implications of a changing agenda’, Global Environmental Change
  13. 1992, ‘A Framework for Improving Environmental Management: Beyond the Market Mechanism’, World Development, 20, 255, 10.1016/0305-750X(92)90103-3 · DOI
  14. 1994, Social Theory and the Global Environment
  15. 1994, Strategies for Sustainable Development: Local Agendas for the Southern Hemisphere
  16. Timmer, 1995, ‘Getting agriculture moving: do markets provide the right signals?’, Food Policy, 20, 10.1016/0306-9192(95)00038-G · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Bush, R.
Venue
Review of African Political Economy
Published
2000-06-01
Volume
27
Issue
84
ISSN
  • 0305-6244
  • 1740-1720
Cited by
16
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review