The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An Agricultural Strategy without Farmers: Egypt’s Countryside in the New Millennium
Abstract
This article argues that Egypt's countryside is at a turning point. The economic reforms have not delivered the intended improvements in production and yet there is little indication that the Government of Egypt (GoE) will manage to work with the IFIs to promote an alternative economic adjustment. The reforms began in Egypt's agricultural sector in the mid‐1980s and were eventually matched in 1991 by an economic reform and structural adjustment programme (ERSAP) and a renewed programme with the IFIs in 1996. Macro‐economic targets set by the IFIs have helped stabilise the economy, reduce government expenditure, inflation and budget deficits although large scale privatisation of state assets have failed to emerge and so too has significant economic growth (Pfeifer, 1999; Mitchell, 1999). Attention has particularly focused on price and marketing reforms in agriculture, on the slashing of subsidies and on the promotion of cash crops for export. Land reform, favouring landowners and marginalising tenant interests, has also been central to agricultural transformation. Sustained and diverse economic growth has eluded Egypt's economy. Unemployment remains a central problem exacerbated by the economic reforms as levels of rural and urban poverty have also risen.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Inequality worsened amid an onrush of foreign investors (Elloumi 2006; Bush 2000; Mundy and Pelat 2015; Mundy, al-Hakimi, and Pelat 2014).”
From Delinking, food sovereignty, and populist agronomy: notes on an intellectual history of the peasant path in the global South (2018) · cites this paper as Bush 2000
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 16
- 1990, Peasant Politics in Modern Egypt: the Struggle against the State
- R Bush, 1999, Economic Crisis and the Politics of Reform in Egypt
- Cleaver, 1994, Reversing the Spiral
- P. Dasgupta, 1993, An Inquiry into Wellbeing and Destitution
- M Desai, 1992, ‘Population and Poverty in Africa’, African Development Review, 4, 63, 10.1111/j.1467-8268.1992.tb00138.x · DOI
- 1993, Sustainable Agriculture in Egypt
- 1996, Egypt's Agriculture in a Reform Era
- 1996, Egypt: Human Development Report
- Kienle, 1998, ‘More than a Response to Islamism: The Political Deliberalisation of Egypt in the 1990s’, Middle East Journal, 52, 219
- T. Mitchell, 1999, ‘No Factories, No Problems: The Logic of Neo‐Liberalism in Egypt’, in Review of African Political Economy, 26, 455, 10.1080/03056249908704412 · DOI
- K Pfeiffer, 1999, ‘Parameters of Economic Reform in North Africa’, Review of African Political Economy, 26, 441, 10.1080/03056249908704411 · DOI
- M. Redclift, 1992, ‘Sustainable development and global environmental change, implications of a changing agenda’, Global Environmental Change
- 1992, ‘A Framework for Improving Environmental Management: Beyond the Market Mechanism’, World Development, 20, 255, 10.1016/0305-750X(92)90103-3 · DOI
- 1994, Social Theory and the Global Environment
- 1994, Strategies for Sustainable Development: Local Agendas for the Southern Hemisphere
- Timmer, 1995, ‘Getting agriculture moving: do markets provide the right signals?’, Food Policy, 20, 10.1016/0306-9192(95)00038-G · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ajl, M. (2018) · Review of African Political Economy · doi:10.1080/03056244.2018.1443437 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Bush, R.
- Venue
- Review of African Political Economy
- Publisher
- Review of African Political Economy
- Published
- 2000-06-01
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 84
- ISSN
- 0305-6244
- 1740-1720
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review