CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 388Water Governance and InfrastructureSouth African History and CultureLegal Issues in South Africa

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Citizenship Prepaid: Water, Calculability, and Techno-Politics in South Africa*

von Schnitzler, Antina·2008·Journal of Southern African Studies
DOI 10.1080/03057070802456821
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Since the first general elections in 1994, the post-apartheid state has been faced by widespread non-payment of service charges in townships, often interpreted as a ‘culture of non-payment’ held to stem from the anti-apartheid rent boycotts of the 1980s. After the spectacular failure of a campaign to encourage payment for services, and in a context of neoliberal reforms prescribing ‘cost recovery’, many municipalities resorted to the large-scale deployment of prepaid meters, devices that self-disconnect households following non-payment. This article focuses on Operation Gcin'amanzi (Zulu for ‘Save Water’), a controversial large-scale project initiated by the recently corporatised utility, Johannesburg Water, to install prepaid water meters in all Soweto households. Taking this project and the protests against it as a point of departure, I trace the history of prepayment technology in South Africa from its initial development as a depoliticising device in the context of the rent boycotts, to its present deployment in the context of ‘cost recovery’ and neoliberal reforms. While the origins of the meter remain inscribed in the technology, in the post-apartheid period the prepaid meter has been re-rationalised as a pedagogical device ‘aiding’ residents to calculate and economise their water consumption. This entailed creation of what Michel Callon has called ‘spaces of calculability’, forcing especially poor Soweto residents to subject their daily consumption practices to a const…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/03057070802456821

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–387 of 387

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
von Schnitzler, A.
Affiliations
Columbia University (US)
Corresponding author
von Schnitzler, Antina
Venue
Journal of Southern African Studies
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2008-11-28
Volume
34
Issue
4
Pages
899-917
ISSN
  • 0305-7070 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-3893
DOI
10.1080/03057070802456821
OpenAlex
W2050710925
Cited by
388
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 10
FWCI
29.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Southern African Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Water Governance and Infrastructure
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › South African History and Culture
  • Social Sciences › Law › Legal Issues in South Africa
Keywords
prepaid meters, cost recovery, Michel Callon, citizenship, Soweto, techno-politics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review