Fragmented sovereignty: Land reform and dispossession in Laos
Abstract
Land reform, land politics and resettlement in Laos have changed people's land access and livelihoods. But these reforms have also transformed political subjectivity and landed property into matters for government to a degree hitherto unknown in Laos. The control over people, land and space has consolidated sovereignty in ways that make government an ineluctable part of people's relation to land. This transforms agrarian relations. Three cases demonstrate how rural small holders' access to land depends on the ways in which property and political subjects have been produced. As a consequence, agovernment institution's control over land does not represent or reflect pre-existing sovereignty. It producesit.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Frontier expansion disassembles pre-existing territorial orders and reassembles them through a rearrangement of resource access and control patterns, usually resulting in local dispossession.
“Frontier expansion, therefore, disassembles pre-existing territorial orders and reassembles them in a different way through a rearrangement of resource access and control patterns, usually resulting in local dispossession (Tsing, 2003;Lund, 2011;Li, 2014).”
From Beyond the “supply chain” framing: Cattle ranching as a vanishing mediator of deforestation and dispossession in the Brazilian and Colombian Amazon (2026) · cites this paper as Lund, 2011
Local dispossession is part and parcel of landscape transformations in frontier contexts.
“Predictably, local dispossession is part and parcel of such landscape transformations (Tsing, 2003;Lund, 2011;Li, 2014a).”
From Beyond the “supply chain” framing: Cattle ranching as a vanishing mediator of deforestation and dispossession in the Brazilian and Colombian Amazon (2026) · cites this paper as Lund, 2011
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bastos Lima, M. G., & López, J. (2026) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2026.107532
- Authors
- Lund, C.
- Corresponding author
- Lund, Christian
- ORCID
- Lund, Christian
- Venue
- Journal of Peasant Studies
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2011-10
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 885-905
- ISSN
- 0306-6150 (ISSN-L)
- 1743-9361
- OpenAlex
- W2032082944
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 13.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Peasant Studies (publishedVersion)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
- RUCforsk (Roskilde University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Land Rights and Reforms
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies
- Keywords
- land reform, dispossession, sovereignty, land politics, resettlement, smallholder farmers, agrarian relations, political subjectivity, land access, rural livelihoods, state control of land, Laos
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review