Cited by 643Agriculture, Land Use, Rural DevelopmentLand Rights and ReformsLatin American rural development

Land grabbing in Latin America and the Caribbean

Borras, Saturnino M., Franco, Jennifer C., Gómez, Sergio, Kay, Cristóbal, Spoor, Max·2012·The Journal of Peasant Studies

Abstract

Land grabbing has gained momentum in Latin America and the Caribbean during the past decade. The phenomenon has taken different forms and character as compared to processes that occur in other regions of the world, especially Africa. It puts into question some of the assumptions in the emerging literature on land grabbing, suggesting these are too food-centered/too food crisis-centered, too land-centred, too centred on new global food regime players – China, South Korea, Gulf States and India – and too centred on Africa. There are four key mechanisms through which land grabbing in Latin American and the Caribbean has been carried out: food security initiatives, energy/fuel security ventures, other climate change mitigation strategies, and recent demands for resources from newer hubs of global capital. The hallmark of land grabbing in the region is its intra-regional character: the key investors are (Trans-)Latin American companies, often in alliance with international capital and the central state. Initial evidence suggests that recent land investments have consolidated the earlier trend away from (re)distributive land policies in most countries in the region, and are likely to result in widespread reconcentration of land and capital.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/03066150.2012.679931

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The paper provides evidence of exploitive production relations in the region, which may portend a new wave of contention brought on by what has been referred to in the literature as a land grab through informal contract farming.

    “We provide evidence of exploitive production relations in the region, which may portend a new wave of contention brought on by what has been referred to in the literature as a land grab through informal contract farming [31][32][33].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Borras, S. M., Franco, J. C., Gómez, S., Kay, C., & Spoor, M.
Venue
The Journal of Peasant Studies
Published
2012-05-28
Volume
39
Issue
3-4
Pages
845-872
ISSN
  • 0306-6150 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-9361
OpenAlex
W1985821611
Cited by
643
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 55 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 51 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 44 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 43 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 14
FWCI
137.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Peasant Studies (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Land Rights and Reforms
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Latin American rural development
Keywords
land grabbing, Latin America, Caribbean, food security, energy security, climate change mitigation, foreign direct investment, land consolidation, land policy, transnational capital

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review