Farming is easy, becoming Brazilian is hard: North American soy farmers’ social values of production, work and land in Soylandia
Abstract
Since the late 1980s, North American farmers have been migrating to Brazil to produce soybeans and escape a general farm crisis in the United States. This paper analyzes their work, values, social relations and relations with the land in order to understand transnational farming and agrarian change from the perspective of transnational farmers. North Americans’ migration to Brazil and soy production in Brazil can inform our understanding of the mechanisms of the soy boom and unpack the relative significance of social values at play in intensive, technified and financialized agriculture. It also provides an evocative perspective of the soy boom as it engages with issues of transnationalism, crisis, migration and change in business and farming practices. Using ethnographic data, this paper explores the intimate and emerging realities of agrarian change by detailing four elements of transnational farming – migration, farm management, land use and work – through the narration of three farmers’ career histories. These cases address the transformation of social values of work, land and social relations through the processes of migration and agrarian change. Farmers’ work, it is found, emerges out of an entanglement of regulations, expertise, meanings of work and land, worker relations and the political economy of Brazil and the United States.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
MATOPIBA is targeted by investors from Brazil and abroad.
“which is targeted by investors from Brazil and abroad ( Ofstehage, 2015 andEMBRAPA, 2016).”
From Transition in environmental governance in the Brazilian Amazon: emergence of a new pattern of socio-economic development and deforestation (2016) · cites this paper as Ofstehage, 2015
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Tritsch, I., & Arvor, D. (2016) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.09.018 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ofstehage, A.
- Corresponding author
- Ofstehage, Andrew
- ORCID
- Ofstehage, Andrew
- Venue
- The Journal of Peasant Studies
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2015-06-26
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 442-460
- ISSN
- 0306-6150 (ISSN-L)
- 1743-9361
- OpenAlex
- W1595026516
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 5.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Peasant Studies (publishedVersion)
- Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Halperin Memorial Fund
- Tinker Foundation
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Rural Development and Agriculture
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration and Labor Dynamics
- Keywords
- soybean production, agricultural transformation, farm management, land use, financialization of agriculture, agricultural crisis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review