The DOI matches its Crossref record; 84 of the 84 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Plantations, outgrowers and commercial farming in Africa: agricultural commercialisation and implications for agrarian change
Open accessAbstract
Whether or not investments in African agriculture can generate quality employment at scale, avoid dispossessing local people of their land, promote diversified and sustainable livelihoods, and catalyse more vibrant local economies depends on what farming model is pursued. In this Forum, we build on recent scholarship by discussing the key findings of our recent studies in Ghana, Kenya and Zambia. We examined cases of three models of agricultural commercialisation, characterised by different sets of institutional arrangements that link land, labour and capital. The three models are: plantations or estates with on-farm processing; contract farming and outgrower schemes; and medium-scale commercial farming areas. Building on core debates in the critical agrarian studies literature, we identify commercial farming areas and contract farming as producing the most local economic linkages, and plantations/estates as producing more jobs, although these are of low quality and mostly casual. We point to the gender and generational dynamics emerging in the three models, which reflect the changing demand for family and wage labour. Models of agricultural commercialisation do not always deliver what is expected of them in part because local conditions play a critical role in the unfolding outcomes for land relations, labour regimes, livelihoods and local economies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research
Robinson, P. (2007) · Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1111/j.1753-6405.2007.00096.x · Cited by 23,258
Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research
นิลพันธุ์, ม. (2010) · Silpakorn Educational Research Journal · Cited by 9,351
Filmer, D., & Pritchett, L. H. (2001) · Demography · doi:10.1353/dem.2001.0003 · Cited by 5,238
World development report, 2008: agriculture for development
(2008) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.45-4765 · Cited by 3,436
Global Shadows: Africa in the Neoliberal World Order
Ferguson, J. (2006) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9780822387640 · Cited by 1,747
Global Shadows: Africa in the Neoliberal World Order
Ferguson, J. (2006) · Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) · Cited by 1,350
No Condition Is Permanent: The Social Dynamics of Agrarian Change in Sub-Saharan Africa
Fruzzetti, L. M., & Berry, S. (1994) · The International Journal of African Historical Studies · doi:10.2307/220797 · Cited by 1,233
Rising global interest in farmland: can it yield sustainable and equitable benefits?
(2011) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.49-0396 · Cited by 1,204
Class Dynamics of Agrarian Change
Bernstein, H. (2010) · doi:10.1515/9781565494077 · Cited by 1,130
Dolan, C., & Humphrey, J. (2000) · Journal of Development Studies · doi:10.1080/713600072 · Cited by 1,093
Metadata
- Authors
- Hall, R., Scoones, I., & Tsikata, D.
- Venue
- The Journal of Peasant Studies
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2017-03-16
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 515-537
- ISSN
- 0306-6150 (ISSN-L)
- 1743-9361
- OpenAlex
- W2595520367
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 84
- FWCI
- 56.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Plantations, outgrowers and commercial farming in Africa: agricultural commercialisation and implications for agrarian change. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/03066150.2016.1263187
- The paper
- Hall, R., Scoones, I., & Tsikata, D. (2017). Plantations, outgrowers and commercial farming in Africa: agricultural commercialisation and implications for agrarian change. The Journal of Peasant Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2016.1263187
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.