The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Rising global interest in farmland: can it yield sustainable and equitable benefits?
Abstract
Interest in farmland is rising. And, given commodity price volatility, growing human and environmental pressures, and worries about food security, this interest will increase, especially in the developing world. One of the highest development priorities in the world must be to improve smallholder agricultural productivity, especially in Africa. Smallholder productivity is essential for reducing poverty and hunger, and more and better investment in agricultural technology, infrastructure, and market access for poor farmers is urgently needed. When done right, larger-scale farming systems can also have a place as one of many tools to promote sustainable agricultural and rural development, and can directly support smallholder productivity, for example, throughout grower programs. However, recent press and other reports about actual or proposed large farmland acquisition by big investors have raised serious concerns about the danger of neglecting local rights and other problems. They have also raised questions about the extent to which such transactions can provide long-term benefits to local populations and contribute to poverty reduction and sustainable development. Although these reports are worrying, the lack of reliable information has made it difficult to understand what has been actually happening. Against this backdrop, the World Bank, under the leadership of Managing Director Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, along with other development partners, has highlighted the need for good empirical evidence to inform decision makers, especially in developing countries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The number, size, and distribution of farms, smallholder farms, and family farms worldwide
Lowder, S. K., Skoet, J., & Raney, T. (2016) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.10.041 · Cited by 2,012
The new enclosures: critical perspectives on corporate land deals
White, B., Borras Jr., S. M., Hall, R., Scoones, I., & Wolford, W. (2012) · The Journal of Peasant Studies · doi:10.1080/03066150.2012.691879 · Cited by 913
Can sub-Saharan Africa feed itself?
van Ittersum, M. K., van Bussel, L. G. J., Wolf, J., Grassini, P., van Wart, J., Guilpart, N., Claessens, L., de Groot, H., Wiebe, K., Mason-D’Croz, D., et al. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1610359113 · Cited by 899
Mapping the world's degraded lands
Gibbs, H. K., & Salmon, J. M. (2015) · Applied Geography · doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.11.024 · Cited by 753
The interaction of human population, food production, and biodiversity protection
Crist, E., Mora, C., & Engelman, R. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aal2011 · Cited by 733
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2011-09-01
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 01
- Pages
- 49-0396-49-0396
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W2148560200
- Cited by
- 1,204
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rising global interest in farmland: can it yield sustainable and equitable benefits? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.49-0396
- The paper
- Rising global interest in farmland: can it yield sustainable and equitable benefits? (2011). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.49-0396
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.