CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 377Extractivism and Socioeconomic IssuesMining and Resource ManagementSocial Sciences and Humanities

From extractivism to global extractivism: the evolution of an organizing concept

Open access
Chagnon, Christopher W., Durante, Francesco, Gills, Barry K., Hagolani-Albov, Sophia E., Hokkanen, Saana, Kangasluoma, Sohvi M. J., Konttinen, Heidi, Kröger, Markus +3 more·2022·The Journal of Peasant Studies
DOI 10.1080/03066150.2022.2069015
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Research on extractivism has rapidly proliferated, expanding into new empirical and conceptual spaces. We examine the origins, evolution, and conceptual expansion of the concept. Extractivism is useful to analyze resource extraction practices around the world. ‘Global Extractivism’ is a new conceptual tool for assessing global phenomena. We situate extractivism within an ensemble of concepts, and explore its relation to development, the state, and value. Extractivism as an organizing concept addresses many fields of research. Extractivism forms a complex of self-reinforcing practices, mentalities, and power differentials underwriting and rationalizing socio-ecologically destructive modes of organizing life-through subjugation, depletion, and non-reciprocity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/03066150.2022.2069015

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Extractivism can be described as a specific socioeconomic pattern and way of seeing and constituting the world, leading to the organization of nature based on a classification system that creates a hierarchy between humans and non-humans that objectifies 'nature' and denies 'the sacred'.

    “For us, then, extractivism can be described as a specific socioeconomic pattern (or structure of”

    From The political ecologies of "green" extractivism(s): An introduction (2024) · cites this paper as Chagnon et al., 2022

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 193

  1. Akram-Lodhi, A. Haroon. 2022. “Food Regimes and Agrarian Questions.” In The Essential Guide to Critical Development Studies, edited by Henry Veltmeyer, and Paul Bowles, 275–283. Second Edition, Routledge Critical Development Studies. Abingdon Oxon, New York, NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003037187-41(open in a new window). · DOI
  2. Akram-Lodhi, A. Haroon, and Cristóbal Kay. 2010a. “Surveying the Agrarian Question (Part 1): Unearthing Foundations, Exploring Diversity.” Journal of Peasant Studies 37 (1): 177–202. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150903498838(open in a new window). · DOI
  3. Akram-Lodhi, A. Haroon, and Cristóbal Kay. 2010b. “Surveying the Agrarian Question (Part 2): Current Debates and Beyond.” Journal of Peasant Studies 37 (2): 255–284. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03066151003594906(open in a new window). · DOI
  4. Amin, Samir. 2011. Maldevelopment: Anatomy of a Global Failure. Oxford, United Kingdom: Fahamu.
  5. Andrade, Daniela. 2022. “Neoliberal Extractivism: Brazil in the Twenty-First Century.” Journal of Peasant Studies 49 (4).
  6. Andreucci, Diego, Melissa García-Lamarca, Jonah Wedekind, and Erik Swyngedouw. 2017. “‘Value Grabbing’: A Political Ecology of Rent.” Capitalism Nature Socialism 28 (3): 28–47. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10455752.2016.1278027(open in a new window). · DOI
  7. Andreucci, Diego, and Isabella M. Radhuber. 2017. “Limits to “Counter-Neoliberal” Reform: Mining Expansion and the Marginalisation of Post-Extractivist Forces in Evo Morales’s Bolivia.” Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences 84: 280–291. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.09.002(open in a new window). · DOI
  8. Ashamole, Darlington C. 2019. “Extractive Industry and the Politics of Manhood in Nigeria’s Niger Delta: A Masculinity Perspective of Gender Implication of Resource Extractivism.” NORMA 14 (4): 255–270. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/18902138.2019.1663988(open in a new window). · DOI
  9. Ayelazuno, Jasper Abembia. 2014. “The “New Extractivism” in Ghana: A Critical Review of Its Development Prospects.” The Extractive Industries and Society 1 (2): 292–302. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2014.04.008(open in a new window). · DOI
  10. Ayelazuno, Jasper Abembia. 2019. “Land Governance for Extractivism and Capitalist Farming in Africa: An Overview.” Land Use Policy 81 (2): 843–851. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.06.037(open in a new window). · DOI
  11. Barbier, Edward. 2011. Scarcity and Frontiers: How Economies Have Developed through Natural Resource Exploitation. Cambridge, United Kingdom; New York: Cambridge University Press.
  12. Barbier, Edward B. 2012. “Scarcity, Frontiers and Development.” The Geographical Journal 178 (2): 110–122. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4959.2012.00462.x(open in a new window). · DOI
  13. Barbier, Edward B. 2019. Natural Resources and Economic Development. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316875681(open in a new window). · DOI
  14. Barney, Keith. 2009. “Laos and the Making of a ‘Relational’ Resource Frontier.” Geographical Journal 175 (2): 146–159. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4959.2009.00323.x(open in a new window). · DOI
  15. Barrington-Leigh, Christopher. 2017. “The Role of Subjective Well-Being as an Organizing Concept for Community Indicators.” In Community Quality-of-Life Indicators: Best Cases VII, edited by Meg Holden, Rhonda Phillips, and Chantal Stevens, 19–34. New York, NY: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54618-6(open in a new window). · DOI
  16. Bebbington, Anthony, Abdul-Gafaru Abdulai, Denise Humphreys Bebbington, Marja Hinfelaar, and Cynthia Sanborn. 2018. Governing Extractive Industries: Politics, Histories, Ideas. 1st ed. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
  17. Bennett, Jane. 2010. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  18. Bennett, Mia M. 2016. “Discursive, Material, Vertical, and Extensive Dimensions of Post-Cold War Arctic Resource Extraction.” Polar Geography 39 (4): 258–273. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1088937X.2016.1234517(open in a new window). · DOI
  19. Beyea, Suzanne, and Leslie H. Nicoll. 1998. “Writing an Integrative Review.” AORN Journal 67 (4): 877–880. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/s0001-2092(06)62653-7(open in a new window). · DOI
  20. Billo, Emily. 2020. “Patriarchy and Progressive Politics: Gendered Resistance to Mining Through Everyday Social Relations of State Formation in Intag, Ecuador.” Human Geography 13 (1): 16–26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1942778620910895(open in a new window). · DOI
  21. Blaser, Mario, and Marisol de la Cadena. 2018. “Introduction. PLURIVERSE.” In A World of Many Worlds, edited by Marisol de la Cadena, and Mario Blaser, 1–22. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  22. Bond, Patrick. 2016. “BRICS Banking and the Debate Over sub-Imperialism.” Third World Quarterly 37 (4): 611–629. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2015.1128816(open in a new window). · DOI
  23. Borras, Jr., Saturnino M. 2020. “Agrarian Social Movements: The Absurdly Difficult but not Impossible Agenda of Defeating Right-Wing Populism and Exploring A Socialist Future.” Journal of Agrarian Change 20 (1): 3–36. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.12311(open in a new window). · DOI
  24. Borras, Saturnino, M. Ruth Hall, Ian Scoones, Ben White, and Wendy Wolford. 2011. “Towards a Better Understanding of Global Land Grabbing: An Editorial Introduction.” Journal of Peasant Studies 38 (2): 209–216. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2011.559005(open in a new window). · DOI
  25. Borras, Jr., Saturnino M., Cristóbal Kay, Sergio Gómez, and John Wilkinson. 2012. “Land Grabbing and Global Capitalist Accumulation: key Features in Latin America.” Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d'études du développement 33 (4): 402–416. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02255189.2012.745394(open in a new window). · DOI
  26. Brad, Alina, Anke Schaffartzik, Melanie Pichler, and Christina Plank. 2015. “Contested Territorialization and Biophysical Expansion of Oil Palm Plantations in Indonesia.” Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences 64 (8): 100–111. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.06.007(open in a new window). · DOI
  27. Brand, Ulrich, Tobias Boos, and Alina Brad. 2017. “Degrowth and Post-Extractivism: Two Debates with Suggestions for the Inclusive Development Framework.” Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 24 (2): 36–41. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.01.007(open in a new window). · DOI
  28. Brand, Ulrich, Kristina Dietz, and Miriam Lang. 2016. “Neo-Extractivism in Latin America – One Side of a New Phase of Global Capitalist Dynamics.” Ciencia Política 11 (21): 125–159. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15446/cp.v11n21.57551(open in a new window). · DOI
  29. Brand, Ulrich, Christoph Görg, and Markus Wissen. 2020. “Overcoming Neoliberal Globalization: Social-Ecological Transformation from a Polanyian Perspective and Beyond.” Globalizations 17 (1): 161–176. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2019.1644708(open in a new window). · DOI
  30. Bruna, Natcha. 2022. “Going Beyond Efficiency-Driven Extractivism: A Climate-Smart World and the Rise of Green Extractivism.” Journal of Peasant Studies 49 (4).
  31. Bunker, Stephen G. 1988. Underdeveloping the Amazon: Extraction, Unequal Exchange, and the Failure of the Modern State. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  32. Busscher, Nienke, Constanza Parra, and Frank Vanclay. 2020. “Environmental Justice Implications of Land Grabbing for Industrial Agriculture and Forestry in Argentina.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 63 (3): 500–522. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2019.1595546(open in a new window). · DOI
  33. Calzada, Igor. 2019. “Data Spaces and Democracy.” RSA Journal 165 (Issue 2 (5578)): 40–43. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.35392/89601/1(open in a new window). · DOI
  34. Caretta, Martina Angela, Sofia Zaragocin, Bethani Turley, and Kamila Orellana. 2020. “Women’s Organizing Against Extractivism: Towards A Decolonial Multi-Sited Analysis.” Human Geography 13 (1): 49–59. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1942778620910898(open in a new window). · DOI
  35. Castree, Noel. 2008. “Neoliberalising Nature: Processes, Effects, and Evaluations.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 40 (1): 153–173. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1068/a39100(open in a new window). · DOI
  36. Chagnon, Christopher W., Sophia E. Hagolani-Albov, and Saana Hokkanen. 2021. “Extractivism at Your Fingertips.” In Our Extractive Age: Expressions of Violence and Resistance, edited by Judith Shapiro, and John-Andrew McNeish, 176–188. Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge.
  37. Clark, Timothy P., and Stefano B. Longo. 2021. “Global Labor Value Chains, Commodification, and the Socioecological Structure of Severe Exploitation. A Case Study of the Thai Seafood Sector.” Journal of Peasant Studies, 1–25. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2021.1890041(open in a new window). · DOI
  38. Cordell, Dana, Jan-Olof Drangert, and Stuart White. 2009. “The Story of Phosphorus: Global Food Security and Food for Thought.” Global Environmental Change 19 (2): 292–305. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.10.009(open in a new window). · DOI
  39. Couldry, Nick, and Ulises Ali Mejias. 2019. The Costs of Connection: How Data Is Colonizing Human Life and Appropriating it for Capitalism. Culture and Economic Life. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  40. Dal Maso, Giulia, Shanthi Robertson, and Dallas Rogers. 2019. “Cultural Platform Capitalism: Extracting Value from Cultural Asymmetries in RealTech.” Social & Cultural Geography 22 (4): 565–580. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2019.1601246(open in a new window). · DOI
  41. De Angelis, Massimo. 2004. “Separating the Doing and the Deed: Capital and the Continuous Character of Enclosures.” Historical Materialism 12 (2): 57–87. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1163/1569206041551609(open in a new window). · DOI
  42. de la Cadena, Marisol, and Mario Blaser, eds. 2018. A World of Many Worlds. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  43. de la Cadena, Marisol, Marianne E. Lien, Mario Blaser, Casper Bruun Jensen, Tess Lea, Atsuro Morita, Heather Swanson, Gro B. Ween, Paige West, and Margaret Wiener. 2015. “Anthropology and STS: Generative Interfaces, Multiple Locations.” HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 5 (1): 437–475. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14318/hau5.1.020(open in a new window). · DOI
  44. de los Reyes, Julie. 2022. “Re-making Pascua Lama: Corporate Financialisation and the Production of Extractive Space.” Journal of Peasant Studie 49 (4).
  45. DeVore, Jonathan. 2017. “The Mind of the Copaíba Tree: Notes on Extractivism, Animism, and Ontology from Southern Bahia.” Ethnobiology Letters 8 (1): 115–124. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14237/ebl.8.1.2017.965(open in a new window). · DOI
  46. Dunlap, Alexander, and Jostein Jakobsen. 2019. The Violent Technologies of Extraction: Political Ecology, Critical Agrarian Studies and the Capitalist Worldeater. London, UK: Palgrave, McMillan. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26852-7(open in a new window). · DOI
  47. Durante, Francesco, Markus Kröger, and William LaFleur. 2021. “Extraction and Extractivisms: Definitions and Concepts.” In Our Hyper-Extractive Age: Expressions of Violence and Resistance, edited by Judith Shapiro, and John-Andrew McNeish, 19–30. Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003127611-3(open in a new window). · DOI
  48. Ehrnström-Fuentes, Maria. 2019. “Confronting Extractivism – the Role of Local Struggles in the (Un)Making of Place.” Critical Perspectives on International Business. Vol. ahead-of-print (No. ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/cpoib-01-2018-0016(open in a new window). · DOI
  49. Ehrnström-Fuentes, Maria, and Markus Kröger. 2018. “Birthing Extractivism: The Role of the State in Forestry Politics and Development in Uruguay.” Journal of Rural Studies 57: 197–208. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.12.022(open in a new window). · DOI
  50. Eilenberg, Michael. 2014. “Frontier Constellations: Agrarian Expansion and Sovereignty on the Indonesian-Malaysian Border.” Journal of Peasant Studies 41 (2): 157–182. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2014.885433(open in a new window). · DOI
  51. Elhacham, Emily, Liad Ben-Uri, Johnathan Grozovski, Yinon M. Bar-On, and Ron Milo. 2020. “Global Human-Made Mass Exceeds all Living Biomass.” Nature 588 (7838): 442–444. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-3010-5(open in a new window). · DOI
  52. Elkin, Stephen L. 2006. “Political Theory and Political Economy.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Theory, edited by John S. Dryzek, Bonnie Honig, and Anne Phillips, 792–809. Oxford Handbooks of Political Science. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
  53. Engels, Bettina, and Kristina Dietz, eds. 2017. Contested Extractivism, Society and the State: Struggles Over Mining and Land. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58811-1(open in a new window). · DOI
  54. Escobar, Arturo. 2017. “Sustaining the Pluriverse: The Political Ontology of Territorial Struggles in Latin America.” In The Anthropology of Sustainability, edited by Marc Brightman, and Jerome Lewis, 237–256. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan US. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56636-2_14(open in a new window). · DOI
  55. Escobar, Arturo. 2018. Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds. New Ecologies for the Twenty-First Century. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  56. Farthing, Linda, and Nicole Fabricant. 2018. “Open Veins Revisited: Charting the Social, Economic, and Political Contours of the New Extractivism in Latin America.” Latin American Perspectives 45 (5): 4–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X18785882(open in a new window). · DOI
  57. Fernandez, Marianna. 2018. “Feminist Dialogue Series – Feminist Alternatives to Predatory Extractivism: Contributions and Experiences from Latin America.” Mozambique: Friedrich-Ebert-Stifung. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/d096/75d41c61361dedfd130a3751eab032b953e1.pdf(open in a new window).
  58. Foster, John Bellamy. 1999. “Marx’s Theory of Metabolic Rift: Classical Foundations for Environmental Sociology.” American Journal of Sociology 105 (2): 366–405. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/210315(open in a new window). · DOI
  59. Foster, John Bellamy. 2000. Marx’s Ecology: Materialism and Nature. New York, NY: NYU Press.
  60. Frank, Andre Gunder, and Barry K. Gills, eds. 1993. The World System: Five Hundred Years or Five Thousand. London, UK: Routledge.
  61. Frederiksen, Tomas, and Matthew Himley. 2020. “Tactics of Dispossession: Access, Power and Subjectivity at the Extractive Frontier.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 45 (1): 50–64. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12329(open in a new window). · DOI
  62. Friedman, Harriet, and Philip McMichael. 1989. “The Rise and Decline of National Agricultures, 1870 to the Present.” Sociologia Ruralis 29 (2): 93–117. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.1989.tb00360.x(open in a new window). · DOI
  63. Gago, Verónica, and Sandro A. Mezzadra. 2017. “A Critique of the Extractive Operations of Capital: Toward an Expanded Concept of Extractivism.” Rethinking Marxism 29 (4): 574–591. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08935696.2017.1417087(open in a new window). · DOI
  64. Galeano, Eduardo. 1997. Open Veins of Latin America: Five Centuries of the Pillage of a Continent. New York, NY: New York University Press .
  65. Garcia, Ana, and Miguel Borba de Sà. 2022. “Brazil: Development strategies and peripheral conditions.” In The Essential Guide to Critical Development Studies, edited by Henry Veltmeyer, and Paul Bowles, 147–154. Second Edition, Routledge Critical Development Studies. Abingdon Oxon, New York, NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003037187-23(open in a new window). · DOI
  66. Giraudo, Maria Eugenia. 2020. “Dependent Development in South America: China and the Soybean Nexus.” Journal of Agrarian Change 20 (1): 60–78. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.12333(open in a new window). · DOI
  67. Graeber, David. 2001. Toward an Anthropological Theory of Value: The False Coin of Our Own Dreams. New York, NY: Palgrave.
  68. Graeber, David, and David Wengrow. 2021. The Dawn of Everything: A New History of Humanity. London: Penguin UK.
  69. Grosfoguel, Ramón. 2016. “Del «Extractivismo Económico» al «Extractivismo Epistémico» Y «Extractivismo Ontológico»: una Forma Destructiva de Conocer, ser Y Estar en el Mundo.” Tabula Rasa 24: 123–143. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25058/20112742.60(open in a new window). · DOI
  70. Grosfoguel, Ramón. 2020. “Epistemic Extractivism: A Dialogue with Alberto Acosta, Leanne Betasamosake Simpson, and Silvia Rivera Cusicanqui.” In Knowledges Born in the Struggle: Constructing the Epistemologies of the Global South, edited by Boaventura de Sousa Santos, and Maria P. Meneses, 203–218. New York, NY: Routledge.
  71. Gudynas, Eduardo. 2018. “Extractivisms: Tendencies and Consequences.” In Reframing Latin American Development, edited by Ronaldo Munck, and Raúl Delgado Wise, 61–76. Routledge Critical Development Studies. London, UK: Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315170084-4(open in a new window). · DOI
  72. Gunster, Shane, and Robert J. Neubauer. 2019. “(De)Legitimating Extractivism: The Shifting Politics of Social Licence.” Environmental Politics 28 (4): 707–726. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2018.1507290(open in a new window). · DOI
  73. Gustafsson, Maria-Therese, and Martin Scurrah. 2019. “Unpacking the Extractivist State: The Role of Weak State Agencies in Promoting Institutional Change in Peru.” The Extractive Industries and Society 6 (1): 206–214. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2018.08.007(open in a new window). · DOI
  74. Guzmán-Gallegos, María A. 2019. “Controlling Abandoned Oil Installations: Ruination and Ownership in Northern Peruvian Amazonia.” In Indigenous Life Projects and Extractivism: Ethnographies from South America, edited by Cecilie Vindal Ødegaard, and Juan Javier Rivera Andía, 53–74. Cham, CH: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93435-8_2(open in a new window). · DOI
  75. Hall, Derek. 2002. “Environmental Change, Protest, and Havens of Environmental Degradation: Evidence From Asia.” Global Environmental Politics 2 (2): 20–28. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/15263800260047808(open in a new window). · DOI
  76. Harvey, David. 2003. The New Imperialism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, Incorporated. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/helsinki-ebooks/detail.action?docID=886664(open in a new window).
  77. Hickel, Jason, Dylan Sullivan, and Huzaifa Zoomkawala. 2021. “Plunder in the Post-Colonial Era: Quantifying Drain from the Global South Through Unequal Exchange, 1960–2018.” New Political Economy 26 (6): 1030–1047. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2021.1899153(open in a new window). · DOI
  78. Hope, Jessica. 2020. “The Anti-Politics of Sustainable Development: Environmental Critique from Assemblage Thinking in Bolivia.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 46 (1): 208–222. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12409(open in a new window). · DOI
  79. Hosseini, Hamed S.A., and Barry K. Gills. 2020. “Reinventing Global Studies Through Transformative Scholarship: A Critical Proposition.” In The Routledge Handbook of Transformative Global Studies, edited by S. A. Hamed Hosseini, James Goodman, Sara C. Motta, and Barry K. Gills, 13–28. Abingdon: Routledge.
  80. Hoyos, Héctor. 2019. Things with a History: Transcultural Materialism and the Literatures of Extraction in Contemporary Latin America. New York, NY: Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7312/hoyo19304(open in a new window). · DOI
  81. Hudson, Michael. 2012. “The Road to Debt Deflation, Debt Peonage, and Neofeudalism.” Levy Economics Institute of Bard College Working Paper No. 708. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2007284(open in a new window). · DOI
  82. Ingold, Tim. 2018. “One World Anthropology.” HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 8 (1–2): 158–171. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/698315(open in a new window). · DOI
  83. Kay, Cristóbal. 2022. “Contemporary dynamics of agrarian change.” In The Essential Guide to Critical Development Studies, edited by Henry Veltmeyer, and Paul Bowles, 267–274. Second Edition, Routledge Critical Development Studies. Abingdon Oxon, New York, NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003037187-40(open in a new window). · DOI
  84. Kelly, Alice B., and Nancy Lee Peluso. 2015. “Frontiers of Commodification: State Lands and their Formalization.” Society & Natural Resources 28 (5): 473–495. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2015.1014602(open in a new window). · DOI
  85. Kopenawa, Davi, and Bruce Albert. 2013. The Falling Sky: Words of a Yanomami Shaman. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
  86. Krause, Sharon R. 2020. “Environmental Domination.” Political Theory 48 (8): 443–468. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591719890833(open in a new window). · DOI
  87. Kröger, M. 2012. “Neo-mercantilist Capitalism and Post-2008 Cleavages in Economic Decision-Making Power in Brazil.” Third World Quarterly 33 (5): 887–901.
  88. Kröger, Markus. 2013. Contentious Agency and Natural Resource Politics. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
  89. Kröger, Markus. 2014. “The Political Economy of Global Tree Plantation Expansion: A Review.” Journal of Peasant Studies 41 (2): 235–261. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2014.890596(open in a new window). · DOI
  90. Kröger, Markus. 2016. “Spatial Causalities in Resource Rushes: Notes From the Finnish Mining Boom.” Journal of Agrarian Change 16 (4): 543–570. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.12113(open in a new window). · DOI
  91. Kröger, Markus. 2019. “The Global Land Rush and the Arctic.” In The Global Arctic Handbook, edited by Matthias Finger, and Lassi Heininen, 27–43. New York, NY: Springer International Publishing.
  92. Kröger, Markus. 2020. Iron Will: Global Extractivism and Mining Resistance in Brazil and India. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
  93. Kröger, Markus. 2021. Extractivisms, Existences and Extinctions: Monoculture Plantations and Amazon Deforestation. London, UK: Routledge.
  94. Kröger, Markus, and Maria Ehrnström-Fuentes. 2021. “Forestry Extractivism: Uruguay.” In Agrarian Extractivism in Latin America, edited by Ben McKay, Alberto Alonso-Fradejas, and Arturo Ezquerro-Cañete, 186–207. London, UK: Routledge.
  95. Kröger, M., S. E. Hagolani-Albov, and B. Gills. 2021. “Extractivisms.” In Situating Sustainability: A Handbook of Contexts and Concepts, edited by Parker Krieg, and Reetta Toivanen, 239–252. Helsinki University Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33134/HUP-14-17(open in a new window). · DOI
  96. Kröger, Markus, and Anja Nygren. 2020. “Shifting Frontier Dynamics in Latin America.” Journal of Agrarian Change 20 (3): 364–386. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.12354(open in a new window). · DOI
  97. Kuokkanen, Rauna. 2019. “At the Intersection of Arctic Indigenous Governance and Extractive Industries: A Survey of Three Cases.” The Extractive Industries and Society 6 (1): 15–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2018.08.011(open in a new window). · DOI
  98. Laing, Anna F. 2020. “Re-Producing Territory: Between Resource Nationalism and Indigenous Self-Determination in Bolivia.” Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences 108 (1): 28–38. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.11.015(open in a new window). · DOI
  99. Lassila, Maija. 2021. “The Arctic Mineral Resource Rush and the Ontological Struggle for the Viiankiaapa Peatland in Sodankylä, Finland.” Globalizations 18 (4): 635–649. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2020.1831818(open in a new window). · DOI
  100. Laterra, Patricia, María Julia Eliosoff, and Agostina Costantino. 2021. “Austerity Programs in Argentina and the Structural Continuity of Extractivism: A Feminist Perspective.” Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy: A Triannual Journal of Agrarian South Network and CARES 10 (1): 110–138. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/22779760211002643(open in a new window). · DOI
  101. Leifsen, Ebsen. 2020. “The Socionature That neo-Extractivism can see: Practicing Redistribution and Compensation Around Large-Scale Mining in the Southern Ecuadorian Amazon.” Political Geography 82: 102249. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2020.102249(open in a new window). · DOI
  102. Levien, Michael, Michael Watts, and Yan Hairong. 2018. “Agrarian Marxism.” Journal of Peasant Studies 45 (5–6): 853–883. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2018.1534101(open in a new window). · DOI
  103. Li, Taina Murray. 2010. “To Make Live or Let Die? Rural Dispossession and the Protection of Surplus Populations.” Antipode 41: 66–93. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2009.00717.x(open in a new window). · DOI
  104. Loperena, Christopher A. 2017. “Honduras is Open for Business: Extractivist Tourism as Sustainable Development in the Wake of Disaster?” Journal of Sustainable Tourism 25 (5): 618–633. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2016.1231808(open in a new window). · DOI
  105. Macdonald, Catherine. 2018. “The Role of Gender in Extractive Industries.” In Extractive Industries: The Management of Resources as A Driver of Sustainable Development, edited by Tony Addison, and Alan Roe, 442–459. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  106. Machado Aráoz, Horacio. 2013. “Crisis ecológica, conflictos socioambientales y orden neocolonial: Las paradojas de NuestrAmérica en las fronteras del extractivismo.” REBELA – Revista Brasileira de Estudos Latino-Americanos 3 (1): 118–155. https://rebela.emnuvens.com.br/pc/article/view/137(open in a new window).
  107. Machado Aráoz, Horacio. 2015. “Ecología política de los regímenes extractivistas. De reconfiguraciones imperiales y re-exsistencias decoloniales en nuestra América.” Bajo el Volcán 15 (23): 11–51.
  108. Machlis, Gary E., Jo Ellen Force, and William R. Burch. 1997. “The Human Ecosystem Part I: The Human Ecosystem as an Organizing Concept in Ecosystem Management.” Society and Natural Resources 10 (4): 347–367. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08941929709381034(open in a new window). · DOI
  109. Madianou, Mirca. 2019. “Technocolonialism: Digital Innovation and Data Practices in the Humanitarian Response to Refugee Crises.” Social Media + Society 5 (3): 1–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119863146(open in a new window). · DOI
  110. Mann, Michael. 1984. “The Autonomous Power of the State: Its Origins, Mechanisms and Results.” European Journal of Sociology 25 (2): 185–213. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003975600004239(open in a new window). · DOI
  111. Marston, Andrea, and Amy Kennemore. 2019. “Extraction, Revolution, Plurinationalism: Rethinking Extractivism from Bolivia.” Latin American Perspectives 46 (2): 141–160. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X18781347(open in a new window). · DOI
  112. Martinez-Alier, Joan. 2011. “The EROI of Agriculture and its use by the Via Campesina.” Journal of Peasant Studies 38 (1): 145–160. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2010.538582(open in a new window). · DOI
  113. Martín, Facundo. 2017. “Reimagining Extractivism: Insights from Spatial Theory.” In Contested Extractivism, Society and the State: Struggles Over Mining and Land, edited by Bettina Engels, and Kristina Dietz, 21–44. Development, Justice and Citizenship. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58811-1_2(open in a new window). · DOI
  114. Marx, Karl. [1867] 1976. Capital: A Critique of Political Economy. Volume I. Book One: The Process of Production of Capital. Translated by Ben Fowkes. London, UK: Penguin.
  115. McCarthy, James. 2019. “Authoritarianism, Populism, and the Environment: Comparative Experiences, Insights, and Perspectives.” Annals of the American Association of Geographers 109 (2): 301–313. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2018.1554393(open in a new window). · DOI
  116. McKay, Ben M. 2017. “Agrarian Extractivism in Bolivia.” World Development 97: 199–211. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.04.007(open in a new window). · DOI
  117. McKay, Ben M., Alberto Alonso-Fradejas, and Arturo Ezquerro-Cañete, eds. 2021. Agrarian Extractivism in Latin America. New York, NY: Routledge.
  118. McKay, Ben M., Gustavo de L.T. Oliveira, and Juan Liu. 2020. “Authoritarianism, Populism, Nationalism and Resistance in the Agrarian South.” Canadian Journal of Development Studies / Revue Canadienne D'études du Développement 41 (3): 347–362.
  119. McKay, Ben M., and Henry Veltmeyer. 2021. “Industrial Agriculture and Agrarian Extractivism.” In Handbook of Critical Agrarian Studies, edited by A. H. Akram-Lodhi, Kristina Dietz, Bettina Engels, and Ben M. McKay, 503–514. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788972468.00065(open in a new window). · DOI
  120. McMichael, Phillip. 2013. “Value-chain Agriculture and Debt Relations: Contradictory Outcomes.” Third World Quarterly 34 (4): 671–690.
  121. Merino, Roger. 2020. “The Cynical State: Forging Extractivism, Neoliberalism and Development in Governmental Spaces.” Third World Quarterly 41 (1): 58–76. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2019.1668264(open in a new window). · DOI
  122. Mezzadra, Sandro, and Brett Neilson. 2017. “On the Multiple Frontiers of Extraction: Excavating Contemporary Capitalism.” Cultural Studies 31 (2–3): 185–204. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2017.1303425(open in a new window). · DOI
  123. Mintz, Sydney. 1986. Sweetness and Power: The Place of Sugar in Modern History. New York, NY: Viking, Penguin Books.
  124. Monjane, Boaventura, and Natacha Bruna. 2019. “Confronting Agrarian Authoritarianism: Dynamics of Resistance to PROSAVANA in Mozambique.” Journal of Peasant Studies 47 (1): 69–94. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2019.1671357(open in a new window). · DOI
  125. Moore, Jason W. 2000. “Sugar and the Expansion of the Early Modern World-Economy: Common Frontiers, Ecological Transformation, and Industrialization.” Review (Fernand Braudel Center) 23 (3): 409–433. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40241510(open in a new window).
  126. Moore, Samuel A. 2020. “Individuation Through Infrastructure: Get Full Text Research, Data Extraction and the Academic Publishing Oligopoly.” Journal of Documentation 77 (1): 129–141. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/jd-06-2020-0090(open in a new window). · DOI
  127. Nilsen, Alf Gunvald, and Karl von Holdt. 2019. “Rising Powers, People Rising: neo-Liberalization and its Discontents in the BRICS Countries.” Globalizations 16 (2): 121–136. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2018.1479018(open in a new window). · DOI
  128. Nirmal, Padini. 2020. “Nature and Gender.” In International Encyclopedia of Human Geography, 2nd ed., edited by Audrey Kobayashi, 285–293. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102295-5.10232-X’(open in a new window). · DOI
  129. Nogueira, Isabel, Ossi I. Ollinaho, Eduardo Costa Pinto, Grasiela Baruco, Alexis Saludjian, José Paulo Guedes Pinto, Paulo Balanco, and Carlos Schonerwald. 2017. “Mozambican Economic Porosity and the Role of Brazilian Capital: A Political Economy Analysis.” Review of African Political Economy 44 (151): 104–121. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03056244.2017.1295367(open in a new window). · DOI
  130. Nygren, Anja, Markus Kröger, and Barry K. Gills. 2022. “Global Extractivisms and Transformative Alternatives.” Journal of Peasant Studies 49 (4).
  131. Ocaklı, Beril, Tobias Krueger, Marco A. Janssen, and Ulan Kasymov. 2021. “Taking the Discourse Seriously: Rational Self-Interest and Resistance to Mining in Kyrgyzstan.” Ecological Economics 189: 107177. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107177(open in a new window). · DOI
  132. Oliveira, Gustavo de L. T. 2018. “Chinese Land Grabs in Brazil? Sinophobia and Foreign Investments in Brazilian Soybean Agribusiness.” Globalizations 15 (1): 114–133. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2017.1377374(open in a new window). · DOI
  133. Ollinaho, Ossi I. 2016. “Environmental Destruction as (Objectively) Uneventful and (Subjectively) Irrelevant.” Environmental Sociology 2 (1): 53–63. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2015.1114207(open in a new window). · DOI
  134. Ollinaho, Ossi I. 2018. “Virtualization of the Life-World.” Human Studies 41 (2): 193–209. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-017-9455-3(open in a new window). · DOI
  135. Ollinaho, Ossi I., and V. P. J. Arponen. 2020. “Incomegetting and Environmental Degradation.” Sustainability 12 (10): 4007. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104007(open in a new window). · DOI
  136. Ollinaho, Ossi I., and Markus Kröger. 2021. “Agroforestry Transitions: the Good, the bad and the Ugly.” Journal of Rural Studies 82: 210–221. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.01.016(open in a new window). · DOI
  137. Parenti, Christian. 2015. “The Environment Making State: Territory, Nature, and Value.” Antipode 47 (4): 829–848. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12134(open in a new window). · DOI
  138. Patel, Raj, and Jason W. Moore. 2017. A History of the World in Seven Cheap Things: A Guide to Capitalism, Nature, and the Future of the Planet. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  139. Petras, James, and Henry Veltmeyer. 2014. Extractive Imperialism in the Americas: Capitalism's New Frontier. Leiden, NL: Brill. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004268869_001(open in a new window). · DOI
  140. Petras, James F., and Henry Veltmeyer. 2017. “Accumulation by dispossession – and the resistance.” In The Class Struggle in Latin America: Making History Today, edited by James F. Petras, and Henry Veltmeyer, 40–58. Oxon, UK: Routledge.
  141. Piketty, Thomas. 2014. “Capital in the Twenty-First Century: A Multidimensional Approach to the History of Capital and Social Classes.” The British Journal of Sociology 65 (4): 736–747. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12115(open in a new window). · DOI
  142. Plumwood, Val. 1993. “The Politics of Reason: Towards a Feminist Logic.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 71 (4): 436–462. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00048409312345432(open in a new window). · DOI
  143. Polanyi Levitt, Kari. 2022. “Unravelling the Canvas of History.” In The Essential Guide to Critical Development Studies, edited by Henry Veltmeyer, and Paul Bowles, 13–20. Second Edition, Routledge Critical Development Studies. Abingdon Oxon, New York, NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003037187-4(open in a new window). · DOI
  144. Potts, Shaina. 2020. “Law as Geopolitics: Judicial Territory, Transnational Economic Governance, and American Power.” Annals of the American Association of Geographers 110 (4): 1192–1207. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2019.1670041(open in a new window). · DOI
  145. Preston, Jen. 2017. “Racial Extractivism and White Settler Colonialism: An Examination of the Canadian Tar Sands Mega-Projects.” Cultural Studies 31 (2–3): 353–375. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2017.1303432(open in a new window). · DOI
  146. Purcell, Thomas F. 2021. “Contesting Total Extractivism: Between Idealism and Materialism.” Journal of Agrarian Change 12458. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.12458(open in a new window). · DOI
  147. Radhuber, Isabella M. 2015. “Extractive Processes, Global Production Networks and Inequalities.” Refubium - Freie Universität Berlin Repository 89. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17169/refubium-23333(open in a new window). · DOI
  148. Raftopoulos, Malayna. 2017. “Contemporary Debates on Social-Environmental Conflicts, Extractivism and Human Rights in Latin America.” The International Journal of Human Rights 21 (4): 387–404. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2017.1301035(open in a new window). · DOI
  149. Rasmussen, Mattias Borg, and Christian Lund. 2018. “Reconfiguring Frontier Spaces: The Territorialization of Resource Control.” World Development 101: 388–399. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.01.018(open in a new window). · DOI
  150. Ricaurte, Paola. 2019. “Data Epistemologies, The Coloniality of Power, and Resistance.” Television & New Media 20 (4): 350–365. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476419831640(open in a new window). · DOI
  151. Robles, Wilder, and Henry Veltmeyer. 2015. The Politics of Agrarian Reform in Brazil: the Landless Rural Workers Movement. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
  152. Røpke, Inge. 2021. “From Value to Valuation and Appropriation. A Comment on Pirgmaier’s Paper “The Value of Value Theory for Ecological Economics”.” Ecological Economics 187: 107102. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107102(open in a new window). · DOI
  153. Rosales, Antulio. 2016. “Deepening Extractivism and Rentierism: China’s Role in Venezuela’s Bolivarian Developmental Model.” Canadian Journal of Development Studies / Revue Canadienne D'études du Développement 37 (4): 560–577. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02255189.2016.1208605(open in a new window). · DOI
  154. Rosales, Antulio. 2019. “Radical Rentierism: Gold Mining, Cryptocurrency and Commodity Collateralization in Venezuela.” Review of International Political Economy 26 (6): 1311–1332. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2019.1625422(open in a new window). · DOI
  155. Sadowski, Jathan. 2019. “When Data is Capital: Datafication, Accumulation, and Extraction.” Journal of Big Data 6 (1): 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951718820549(open in a new window). · DOI
  156. Sadowski, Jathan. 2020. “The Internet of Landlords: Digital Platforms and New Mechanisms of Rentier Capitalism.” Antipode 52: 562–580. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12595(open in a new window). · DOI
  157. Scoones, Ian, Marc Edelman, Saturnino M. Borras Jr., Ruth Hall, Wendy Wolford, and Ben White. 2018. “Emancipatory Rural Politics: Confronting Authoritarian Populism.” Journal of Peasant Studies 45 (1): 1–20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2017.1339693(open in a new window). · DOI
  158. Scott, James C. 2017. Against the Grain: A Deep History of the Earliest States. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.12987/9780300231687(open in a new window). · DOI
  159. Shattuck, Annie. 2021. “Generic, Growing, Green?: The Changing Political Economy of the Global Pesticide Complex.” Journal of Peasant Studies 48 (2): 231–253. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2020.1839053(open in a new window). · DOI
  160. Smart, Sebastian. 2020. “The Political Economy of Latin American Conflicts Over Mining Extractivism.” The Extractive Industries and Society 7 (2): 767–779. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2020.02.004(open in a new window). · DOI
  161. Stammler, Florian, and Aitalina Ivanova. 2016. “Confrontation, Coexistence or Co-Ignorance? Negotiating Human-Resource Relations in Two Russian Regions.” The Extractive Industries and Society 3 (1): 60–72. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2015.12.003(open in a new window). · DOI
  162. Stensrud, Astrid B. 2016. “Climate Change, Water Practices and Relational Worlds in the Andes.” Ethnos 81 (1): 75–98. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00141844.2014.929597(open in a new window). · DOI
  163. Stensrud, Astrid B. 2019. “Water as Resource and Being: Water Extractivism and Life Projects in Peru.” In Indigenous Life Projects and Extractivism: Ethnographies from South America, edited by Cecilie Vindal Ødegaard, and Juan Javier Rivera Andía, 143–164. Cham, CH: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93435-8_6(open in a new window). · DOI
  164. Strambo, Claudia, and Ana Carolina González Espinosa. 2020. “Extraction and Development: Fossil Fuel Production Narratives and Counternarratives in Colombia.” Climate Policy 20 (8): 931–948. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2020.1719810(open in a new window). · DOI
  165. Svampa, Maristella. 2015. “Commodities Consensus: Neoextractivism and Enclosure of the Commons in Latin America.” South Atlantic Quarterly 114 (1): 65–82. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-2831290(open in a new window). · DOI
  166. Svampa, Maristella. 2019. Neo-Extractivism in Latin America Socio- Environmental Conflicts, the Territorial Turn, and New Political Narratives. 1st ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  167. Szeman, Imre. 2017. “On the Politics of Extraction.” Cultural Studies 31 (2-3): 440–447. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2017.1303436(open in a new window). · DOI
  168. Teràn Mantovani, Emiliano. 2016. “Las Nuevas Fronteras de Las Commodities En Venezuela: Extractivismo, Crisis Histórica y Disputas Territoriales.” Ciencia Política 11 (21): 251–285. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15446/cp.v11n21.60296(open in a new window). · DOI
  169. Tetreault, Darcy, Cindy McCulligh, and Carlos Lucio. 2021. “Distilling Agro-Extractivism: Agave and Tequila Production in Mexico.” Journal of Agrarian Change 21 (2): 219–241. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.12402(open in a new window). · DOI
  170. Thorat, Dhanashree. 2020. “Modalities of Data Colonialism and South Asian Hashtag Publics.” Feminist Media Studies 21 (1): 151–153. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2021.1864874(open in a new window). · DOI
  171. Tilzey, Mark. 2019. “Authoritarian Populism and neo-Extractivism in Bolivia and Ecuador: the Unresolved Agrarian Question and the Prospects for Food Sovereignty as Counter-Hegemony.” Critical Agrarian Studies 46 (3): 262–652. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2019.1584191(open in a new window). · DOI
  172. Toivanen, Tero, and Markus Kröger. 2019. “The Role of Debt, Death and Dispossession in World-Ecological Transformations: Swidden Commons and tar Capitalism in Nineteenth-Century Finland.” Journal of Peasant Studies 46 (7): 1368–1388. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2018.1503173(open in a new window). · DOI
  173. Tola, Miriam. 2018. “Between Pachamama and Mother Earth: Gender, Political Ontology and the Rights of Nature in Contemporary Bolivia.” Feminist Review 118 (1): 25–40. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/s41305-018-0100-4(open in a new window). · DOI
  174. Tsing, Anna Lowenhaupt. 2003. “Natural Resources and Capitalist Frontiers.” Economic and Political Weekly 38 (48): 5100–5106. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4414348(open in a new window).
  175. Turner, Lowell. 1994. “Social Partnership: An Organizing Concept for Industrial Relations Reform.” Workplace Topics 4 (1): 83–97. https://hdl.handle.net/1813/76107(open in a new window).
  176. Uhl, Christopher, Dominik Kulakowski, Jeffery Gerwing, Michelle Brown, and Mark Cochrane. 1996. “Sustainability: A Touchstone Concept for University Operations, Education, and Research.” Conservation Biology 10 (5): 1308–1311.
  177. Ulloa, Astrid. 2020. “The Rights of the Wayúu People and Water in the Context of Mining in La Guajira, Colombia: Demands of Relational Water Justice.” Human Geography 13 (1): 6–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1942778620910894(open in a new window). · DOI
  178. Velásquez, Teresa A. 2018. “Tracing the Political Life of Kimsacocha: Conflicts Over Water and Mining in Ecuador’s Southern Andes.” Latin American Perspectives 45 (5): 154–169. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X17726088(open in a new window). · DOI
  179. Veltmeyer, Henry. 2020. “Latin America in the Vortex of Social Change: Development and Social Movement Dynamics.” World Development 130: 104916. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.104916(open in a new window). · DOI
  180. Veltmeyer, Henry, and Edgar Záyago Lau, eds. 2020. Buen Vivir and the Challenges to Capitalism in Latin America. New York: Routledge.
  181. Verbrugge, Boris, and Sara Geenen. 2019. “The Gold Commodity Frontier: A Fresh Perspective on Change and Diversity in the Global Gold Mining Economy.” The Extractive Industries and Society 6: 413–423. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2018.10.014(open in a new window). · DOI
  182. Vindal Ødegaard, Cecilie, and Juan Javier Rivera Andía. 2019. “Introduction: Indigenous Peoples, Extractivism, and Turbulences in South America.” In Indigenous Life Projects and Extractivism: Ethnographies From South America, edited by Cecilie Vindal Ødegaard, and Juan Javier Rivera Andía, 1–50. Cham, CH: Palgrave Macmillan.
  183. Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1984. “The Development of the Concept of Development.” Sociological Theory 2: 102–116. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/223344(open in a new window). · DOI
  184. Weis, Tony. 2010. “The Accelerating Biophysical Contradictions of Industrial Capitalist Agriculture.” Journal of Agrarian Change 10 (3): 315–341. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0366.2010.00273.x(open in a new window). · DOI
  185. Whittemore, Robin, and Kathleen Knafl. 2005. “The Integrative Review: Updated Methodology.” Journal of Advanced Nursing 52 (5): 546–553. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x(open in a new window). · DOI
  186. Willow, Anna J. 2018. Understanding ExtrACTIVISM: Culture and Power in Natural Resource Disputes. New York, NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429467196(open in a new window). · DOI
  187. Wilson, Emma, and Florian Stammler. 2016. “Beyond Extractivism and Alternative Cosmologies: Arctic Communities and Extractive Industries in Uncertain Times.” The Extractive Industries and Society 3 (1): 1–8. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2015.12.001(open in a new window). · DOI
  188. Wolford, Wendy. 2021. “The Plantationocene: A Lusotropical Contribution to the Theory.” Annals of the American Association of Geographers 111 (6): 1622–1639. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2020.1850231(open in a new window). · DOI
  189. Ye, Jingzhong, Jan Douwe van der Ploeg, Sergio Schneider, and Teodor Shanin. 2019. “The Incursions of Extractivism: Moving from Dispersed Places to Global Capitalism.” Journal of Peasant Studies 47 (1): 155–183. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2018.1559834(open in a new window). · DOI
  190. Záyago Lau, Edgar. 2022. “The Triangle of Underdevelopment: Technology, Patents, and Monopoly.” In The Essential Guide to Critical Development Studies, edited by Henry Veltmeyer, and Paul Bowles, 233–240. Second Edition, Routledge Critical Development Studies. Abingdon Oxon, New York, NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003037187-35(open in a new window). · DOI
  191. Zhang, Hongzhou. 2019. Securing the “Rice Bowl”: China and Global Food Security. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.
  192. Zhen, Zheng. 2020. “From the ‘Greening Motherland’ Campaign to the ‘Ant Forest’ App: Tree-Planting in China’s Environmental Politics.” World Rainforest Movement 251, September 24. https://www.wrm.org.uy/bulletin-articles/from-the-greening-motherland-campaign-to-the-ant-forest-app-tree-planting-in-chinas-environmental-politics(open in a new window).
  193. Zimmer, Zac. 2017. “Bitcoin and Potosí Silver: Historical Perspectives on Cryptocurrency.” Technology and Culture 58 (2): 307–334. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2017.0038(open in a new window). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chagnon, C. W., Durante, F., Gills, B. K., Hagolani-Albov, S. E., Hokkanen, S., Kangasluoma, S. M. J., Konttinen, H., Kröger, M., LaFleur, W., Ollinaho, O., & Vuola, M. P. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
  • Global Development Studies, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
ORCID
Venue
The Journal of Peasant Studies
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2022-05-09
Volume
49
Issue
4
Pages
760-792
ISSN
  • 0306-6150 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-9361
DOI
10.1080/03066150.2022.2069015
OpenAlex
W4229455528
Cited by
377
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 121 · 2025: 110 · 2024: 67 · 2023: 68 · 2022: 11
FWCI
92.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • The Journal of Peasant Studies (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion)
  • LaCRIS (University of Lapland) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Extractivism and Socioeconomic Issues
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Mining and Resource Management
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Social Sciences and Humanities
Keywords
extractivism, resource extraction, conceptual history, development, state, values, power imbalance, subjugation, depletion, nonreciprocity, mentalities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review