Cited by 29Thermochemical Biomass Conversion ProcessesAdsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalBiodiesel Production and Applications

Physico-chemical properties prediction of hydrochar in macroalgae Sargassum horneri hydrothermal carbonisation

Open access
Rasam, Sajjad, Talebkeikhah, Farzaneh, Talebkeikhah, Mohsen, Salimi, Ali, Moraveji, Mostafa Keshavarz·2021·International Journal of Environmental & Analytical Chemistry

Abstract

This study evaluates and compares several machine learning methods on the effects of different parameters in the hydrothermal carbonisation (HTC) process of macroalgae Sargassum horneri. Reaction temperature, residence time, biomass particle size, the amount of catalyst and loaded biomass were considered as inputs and three variables of BET, higher heating value (HHV) and energy recovery were regarded as outputs. For analysing the input parameters, the Taguchi method was used for experimental designs and the obtained results were utilised here as training sets. Various data mining approaches like support vector machine (SVM), group method of data handling, decision tree, random forest, radial basis function, adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) and multilayer perceptron (MLP) neural network were implemented to model the problem and two different optimisation techniques named BAT and Grasshopper Optimisation Algorithm (GOA) were employed with MLP and ANFIS model for optimising. By comparing different statistical parameters such as Average Absolute Relative Deviation (AARD), coefficient of determination (R2), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and Standard Deviation (SD), It is found out that SVM method has a considerably better performance relative to other methods for estimating both the BET, HHV and energy recovery parameters. Furthermore, coupling of MLP and ANFIS with GOA increases the accuracy of these models for BET, HHV and energy recovery estimations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/03067319.2019.1700973

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 41 · Cited by 29

Authors
Rasam, S., Talebkeikhah, F., Talebkeikhah, M., Salimi, A., & Moraveji, M. K.
Affiliations
  • Amirkabir University of Technology (IR)
  • École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
Corresponding author
Moraveji, Mostafa Keshavarz
Venue
International Journal of Environmental & Analytical Chemistry
Published
2019-12-16
Volume
101
Issue
14
Pages
2297-2318
ISSN
  • 0306-7319 (ISSN-L)
  • 1029-0397
OpenAlex
W2995823148
Cited by
29
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2020: 4
FWCI
0.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental & Analytical Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biodiesel Production and Applications
Keywords
hydrochar, Sargassum horneri, hydrothermal carbonization, seaweed, BET surface area, higher heating value, energy recovery, support vector machine, adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system, multilayer perceptron, bat algorithm, Taguchi method, process parameter optimization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review