The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparison and Evaluation of Extraction Media and Their Suitability in a Simple Model to Predict the Biological Relevance of Heavy Metal Concentrations in Contaminated Soils
Abstract
The concentrations of heavy metals in agricultural soils are increasing gradually from various diffuse sources. The metals can transfer from contaminated soils into the growing plants or may affect the respiration rate of soil microorganisms. In the first part of this paper, the following simple model to predict the biorelevant metal concentration in anthropogenically or artificially contaminated soils is reported: log Mp = α + β log [MNaNO3] log MR = α' + β' log [MNaNO3] log MP = log Metal concentration in test plant (mg/kg dry weight) log MR = log percent Redution in the respiration or enzyme activity [MNaNO3] = Metal concentration in NaNO3-soil extract (mg/kg soil) α and β & α' + β' = Intercepts and slopes of the linear regression lines. The model has been tested in laboratory experiments, in growth experiments either in a greenhouse or in the field. Also, an attempt is made to present a theoretical interpretation. Critical concentrations are calculated with the help of the relationship between metal concentration in soil solution [MNaNO3] and metal concentration in plants. The critical concentration, which is able to induce either phyto- or zootoxic concentrations in the plant parts (productive or vegetative) or reduce their growth or to reduce significantly the growth of soil microorganisms, are found to be uniform in a wide range of soils (pH 3 to 8 and CEC 10–50 millimol/100g soil), the critical concentrations of NaNO3 in soil extracts are comparable with the values obtained with plant growth experiments in nutrient solution and also with the concentrations obtained from soil respiration experiments reported in literature.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Rao, C. R. M., Sahuquillo, A., & Lopez Sanchez, J. F. (2008) · Water, Air, and Soil Pollution · doi:10.1007/s11270-007-9564-0 · Cited by 538
Extraction procedures for the determination of heavy metals in contaminated soil and sediment
Rauret, G. (1998) · Talanta · doi:10.1016/s0039-9140(97)00406-2 · Cited by 511
Sahuquillo, A. (2003) · TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0165-9936(03)00303-0 · Cited by 416
Pueyo, M., López-Sánchez, J. F., & Rauret, G. (2004) · Analytica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.aca.2003.10.047 · Cited by 393
Evaluation of copper availability to plants in copper-contaminated vineyard soils
Brun, L. A., Maillet, J., Hinsinger, P., & Pépin, M. (2001) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/s0269-7491(00)00067-1 · Cited by 364
Metadata
- Authors
- Gupta, S. K., & Aten, C.
- Venue
- International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1993-06
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 1-4
- Pages
- 25-46
- ISSN
- 0306-7319 (ISSN-L)
- 1029-0397
- OpenAlex
- W2032750312
- Cited by
- 206
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison and Evaluation of Extraction Media and Their Suitability in a Simple Model to Predict the Biological Relevance of Heavy Metal Concentrations in Contaminated Soils. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/03067319308027609
- The paper
- Gupta, S. K., & Aten, C. (1993). Comparison and Evaluation of Extraction Media and Their Suitability in a Simple Model to Predict the Biological Relevance of Heavy Metal Concentrations in Contaminated Soils. International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1080/03067319308027609
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.