CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 181Colonialism, slavery, and tradeRousseau and Enlightenment ThoughtHistory of Colonial Brazil

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

An enslaved Enlightenment: rethinking the intellectual history of the French Atlantic *

Dubois, Laurent·2006·Social History
DOI 10.1080/03071020500424342
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In 1971, Michèle Duchet published Anthropologie et histoire au siècle des lumières (Anthropology and History in the Century of the Enlightenment), which provided a sweeping analysis of the French p...

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/03071020500424342

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–181 of 181

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Dubois, L.
Affiliations
Michigan State University (US)
Corresponding author
Dubois, Laurent
ORCID
Dubois, Laurent
Venue
Social History
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2006-02
Volume
31
Issue
1
Pages
1-14
ISSN
  • 0307-1022 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-1200
DOI
10.1080/03071020500424342
OpenAlex
W2082556413
Cited by
181
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 59 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
13.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Social History (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Colonialism, slavery, and trade
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Rousseau and Enlightenment Thought
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › History of Colonial Brazil
Keywords
slavery, Enlightenment, French Atlantic, intellectual history, history and anthropology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review