The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
‘Peer learning’ as pedagogic discourse for research education1
Abstract
Research education has been dominated in recent years by policy‐driven preoccupations with doctoral completions, funding and contributions to the economy. This has led universities to focus on enhanced institutional support for research degrees, with an emphasis on supervision, in particular the training of supervisors, and provision of a richer environment for students. This article uses examples from interviews with research students to show how the provision of a rich environment is not in itself sufficient. A new discourse is needed so that students are able to take up opportunities that are available. The article questions the current emphasis and argues that a new focus on pedagogy is explicitly needed. It challenges the dominant focus on supervision and ‘provisionism’ and suggests that a more appropriate pedagogic discourse should draw on the familiar notion of ‘peer’ from the world of research. It argues that peer learning, appropriately theorized and situated within a notion of communities of research practice, might be a productive frame through which to view research education.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815355 · Cited by 35,324
Cited by
Research writing: problems and pedagogies
Aitchison, C., & Lee, A. (2006) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562510600680574 · Cited by 384
Self-citationBaker, V. L., & Lattuca, L. R. (2010) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075070903501887 · Cited by 268
‘Teach us how to do it properly!’ An Australian academic integrity student survey
Bretag, T., Mahmud, S., Wallace, M., Walker, R., McGowan, U., East, J., Green, M., Partridge, L., & James, C. (2014) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2013.777406 · Cited by 199
Ciampa, K., & Wolfe, Z. M. (2023) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2020.1822313 · Cited by 26
Doctoral students as journal editors: non‐formal learning through academic work
Hopwood, N. (2010) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/07294360903532032 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Boud, D., & Lee, A.
- Venue
- Studies in Higher Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-10
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 501-516
- ISSN
- 0307-5079 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-174X
- OpenAlex
- W2064279668
- Cited by
- 405
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ‘Peer learning’ as pedagogic discourse for research education1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/03075070500249138
- The paper
- Boud, D., & Lee, A. (2005). ‘Peer learning’ as pedagogic discourse for research education1. Studies in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070500249138
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.