CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 359Academic integrity and plagiarismEthics in Business and EducationHigher Education Governance and Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 140 of the 144 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Academic integrity: a review of the literature

Macfarlane, Bruce, Zhang, Jingjing, Pun, Annie·2014·Studies in Higher Education
DOI 10.1080/03075079.2012.709495
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This article provides a literature review on academic integrity, which encompasses the values, behaviour and conduct of academics in all aspects of their practice. This is a growing area of academic research as a result of the expansion of higher education on a global basis and concerns about standards of professional conduct. The article maps the main strands of research on academic integrity by reference to teaching, research and service using 115 articles derived from both western and Chinese literature. The review indicates that much of the literature is framed in terms of misconduct or academic corruption with research ethics the dominant focus. Researchers investigating academic integrity draw predominantly on multivariate analysis using surveys/questionnaires, documentary analysis and, more occasionally, interviews. While there has been rapid growth in the literature, a stronger focus is needed on identifying ‘ethical’ as well as ‘unethical’ practice despite the methodological challenges in overcoming social desirability reporting.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/03075079.2012.709495

Cites

140 of 140 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 144 references

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Altbach, P.G. 2004. The question of corruption in academe. International Higher Education, 34, 8–10.
  2. 10.1007/BF02726470 · DOI
  3. 10.1037/0735-7028.28.2.184 · DOI
  4. 10.2307/2943972 · DOI
  5. Brumfiel, G. 2007. Misconduct? It's all academic. Nature, 445, no. 3: 240–41.
  6. Cheung, K.C. 2002. Restraining academic misconduct and promoting academic righteousness. China Higher Education, 9, no. 3: 7–8.
  7. Choi, Y.Q., N. Yu, and L. Guang 2010. Introduction to research integrity and academic culture in higher education. Guangli Xuejia, 10, no. 3: 171
  8. Engle, T.J., and J.L. Smith 1992. Accounting faculty involvement with activities of ethical concern. Accounting Educators' Journal, 4, no. 1: 1–21.
  9. 10.1037/0735-7028.23.3.203 · DOI
  10. 10.1037/0735-7028.23.3.190 · DOI
  11. Liang, T. 2009. Examining the concept of integrity from the Confucius's perspective rooted in the ‘Analects of Confucius’. Chuanshan Journal, 74, no. 4: 75–78.
  12. Ma, L. 2004. Building academic integrity and ethics in university teaching. Ideological and Political Education Research, 5, 36–37.
  13. MacIntyre, A. 1981. After virtue, London: Duckworth.
  14. Sauser, W. I.,Jr. 1990. The ethics of teaching business: Toward a code for business. S.A.M. Advanced Management Journal, 55, no. 4: 33–38.
  15. 10.1037/0003-066X.46.5.506 · DOI
  16. Tung, Y.C., and Y.Y. Tsui 2010. Staff's self-discipline is the key mean to cease academic misconducts. Chinese University Technology Transfer, 8, 1–7.
  17. Wong, T.B., and D.W. Yeung 2010. Concerning the university practices and reflection on academic ethics building. China Higher Education, 7, 33–35.
  18. Wu, Z. 2010. Teaching postgraduates academic integrity through the discussion of integrity in ‘the Analects of Confucius’. Journal of Educational Development, 10, 79–81.
  19. Yeung, Y.S. 2002. Academic decay, academic norms and moral principles. Tribune of Science, 6, 28–34.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–359 of 359

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Macfarlane, B., Zhang, J., & Pun, A.
Affiliations
  • ,
  • Beijing Normal University (CN)
  • University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
Macfarlane, Bruce
ORCID
Venue
Studies in Higher Education
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2012-08-02
Volume
39
Issue
2
Pages
339-358
ISSN
  • 0307-5079 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-174X
DOI
10.1080/03075079.2012.709495
OpenAlex
W2076459868
Cited by
359
References
144
Citations by year
2026: 59 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1
FWCI
19.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Studies in Higher Education (publishedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
  • The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Academic integrity and plagiarism
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Ethics in Business and Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Governance and Development
Keywords
academic integrity, academic misconduct, academic corruption, research ethics, teacher ethics, service ethics, higher education expansion, social desirability bias, ethical practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review