The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessment and the promotion of academic values
Abstract
This paper raises issues concerning the relationship between student assessment and the values which academic institutions propagate. It argues that many current assessment practices are incompatible with the goals of independence, thoughtfulness and critical analysis to which most academics would subscribe; that forms of assessment which are commonplace are not consistent with the behaviour of academics in their own contributions to knowledge; and that there is evidence to suggest that the assessment policy of many departments undermines deep approaches to learning on the part of students. Some indications are given of possible strategies to address the problems which have been identified, drawing upon ideas from academic and professional practice in general and self-assessment and peer review in particular.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x018001032 · Cited by 13,645
Educating the reflective practitioner
Schön, D. A. (1987) · Cited by 11,326
(2014) · The Reflective Practitioner in Professional Education · doi:10.1057/9781137399595.0007 · Cited by 8,325
Improving Learning : New Perspectives
Ramsden, P. (1988) · Cited by 683
Quantitative studies of student self-assessment in higher education: a critical analysis of findings
Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (1989) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/bf00138746 · Cited by 616
Self-citation(1977) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 601
Developing student autonomy in learning
Dalton, R. H. F. (1982) · International Journal of Educational Development · doi:10.1016/0738-0593(82)90084-0 · Cited by 397
Problem-Based Learning in Education for the Professions
Cross, K. P. (1987) · The Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.1080/00221546.1987.11778275 · Cited by 350
Making the Grade: The Academic Side of College Life.
Wegner, E. L., Becker, H. S., Geer, B., & Hughes, E. C. (1969) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2091996 · Cited by 293
Up to the mark: A study of the examination game
Miller, C., & Parlett, M. (1974) · Cited by 285
Cited by
Peer Assessment between Students in Colleges and Universities
Topping, K. (1998) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.2307/1170598 · Cited by 2,173
The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: A review
Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Sluijsmans, D. (1999) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079912331379935 · Cited by 1,206
Programmatic assessment: From assessment of learning to assessment for learning
Schuwirth, L. W. T., & Van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2011) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.3109/0142159x.2011.565828 · Cited by 902
AMEE Guide No 20: The good teacher is more than a lecturer - the twelve roles of the teacher
Crosby, R. M. H. (2000) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/014215900409429 · Cited by 885
Mobile-based assessment: Investigating the factors that influence behavioral intention to use
Nikou, S. A., & Economides, A. A. (2017) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2017.02.005 · Cited by 388
Metadata
- Authors
- Boud, D.
- Venue
- Studies in Higher Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1990-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 101-111
- ISSN
- 0307-5079 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-174X
- OpenAlex
- W1993154455
- Cited by
- 411
- References
- 21
- FWCI
- 4.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessment and the promotion of academic values. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/03075079012331377621
- The paper
- Boud, D. (1990). Assessment and the promotion of academic values. Studies in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079012331377621
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.