Learning by doing: Teaching research methods through student participation in a commissioned research project
Abstract
Teaching research methods to social science undergraduates presents a number of dilemmas, including the development of effective means of providing students with practical research experience and the difficulty of engaging the interest of students in a subject which for many is not intrinsically appealing and to which some have a long-standing aversion. One way of addressing these issues is to enable students to participate in a ‘real˚s research project, often commissioned by an external agency. Reports of this approach have demonstrated its benefits to student learning and have identified some logistical problems of project-based teaching. This paper reports on a project-based research methods course which has been running for 5 years and which has some distinctive features: unlike most such courses it is compulsory and is taken by a relatively large number of students; the research project is funded each year by a commissioning agency; considerable emphasis is placed upon the assessment of students' contributions to the research. These distinctive aspects of the course are discussed in relation to one particular project in which students participated, a patient satisfaction study of an accident and emergency department, funded by a Regional Health Authority. The results of a student evaluation of the learning benefits of involvement in this project are reported. It is concluded that project-based learning of research methods on courses that are larger than those reported in…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Research methods classes are not always well received by college students, and HDFS students are no exception.
“However, research methods classes are not always wellreceived by college students (Crowe et al., 2014;Garner et al., 2009;Winn, 1995), and HDFS students are no exception.”
From Lessons from the field: Isn't it just common sense? Naïve realism as a barrier to learning (2024) · cites this paper as Winn, 1995
Cited by
Sorted by citations
O'Dea, X. (., & O'Dea, M. (2023) · Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice · doi:10.53761/1.20.5.06 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Lessons from the field: Isn't it just common sense? Naïve realism as a barrier to learning
Dyer, K. D. (2024) · Family Relations · doi:10.1111/fare.12967 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Winn, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Brighton (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Winn, Sandra
- Venue
- Studies in Higher Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1995-01
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 203-214
- ISSN
- 0307-5079 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-174X
- OpenAlex
- W2154761364
- Cited by
- 137
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 7.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Studies in Higher Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Problem and Project Based Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methodologies in Social Sciences
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Research and Methods
- Keywords
- research methods teaching, project-based learning, student research participation, student assessment, patient satisfaction, emergency department, student evaluation of learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review