The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Intercurrent coccidiosis and necrotic enteritis of chickens: rational, integrated disease management by maintenance of gut integrity
Open accessAbstract
Coccidiosis and necrotic enteritis (NE) are globally common, sometimes intercurrent, diseases of poultry. The risk of NE, due to the Gram-positive bacterium Clostridium perfringens, has increased in recent years because of the voluntary or legally required withdrawal of the use of certain in-feed antibiotic growth promoters with anticlostridial activity. In-feed ionophorous anticoccidial drugs incidentally also possess anticlostridial activity. Such ionophores, although not banned, are usually precluded when live anticoccidial vaccines are used, potentially increasing yet further the risk of NE. This review provides information for the design of rational, integrated management strategies for the prevention and control of coccidiosis and NE in chickens by maintaining gut integrity. Because of differences in local availability of feed ingredients and national legislations regarding antibiotic growth promoters and anticoccidial vaccine licensing, no universal strategy is applicable. The diseases and their interactions are described under the headings of forms of disease, diagnosis, sources of infection, pathophysiological effects, predisposing factors, and control methods. Elements of gut integrity, which influences host predisposition and clinical responses to disease, include physical development, immune competence, gut enzyme activity, mucin production, gut flora and epithelial damage. Experimental studies of coccidiosis and NE are compared, and where possible reconciled, with field observations. Gaps in knowledge and necessary further experiments are identified. Insights are provided regarding interactions between coccidiosis, NE, and the use of live anticoccidial vaccines. Recent changes in NE prevalence in commercial flocks, and their possible causes, are discussed. The necessarily wide range of topics reviewed emphasizes the enormous complexity of this disease combination, and indicates the importance of a multidisciplinary approach in order to reduce its harmful impact on the world's poultry industry.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
American Journal of Veterinary Research.
(1940) · PubMed · Cited by 5,372
Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association
Nelson, A. M., Jones, M., & Craig, L. E. (2013) · Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association · Cited by 4,493
AFRC, R. F. (1989) · Journal of Applied Bacteriology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.1989.tb05105.x · Cited by 4,149
Clostridial enteric diseases of domestic animals
Songer, J. G. (1996) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.9.2.216 · Cited by 909
The American Journal of Hygiene
(1920) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.52.1356.602.a · Cited by 657
Clostridium perfringens in poultry: an emerging threat for animal and public health
Immerseel, F. V., Buck, J. D., Pasmans, F., Huyghebaert, G., Haesebrouck, F., & Ducatelle, R. (2004) · Avian Pathology · doi:10.1080/03079450400013162 · Cited by 656
Posthatch development of mucosal function in the broiler small intestine
Uni, Z., Ganot, S., & Sklan, D. (1998) · Poultry Science · doi:10.1093/ps/77.1.75 · Cited by 432
Semenza, G. (1986) · Annual Review of Cell Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.cb.02.110186.001351 · Cited by 412
Engberg, R. M., Hedemann, M. S., Steenfeldt, S., & Jensen, B. B. (2004) · Poultry Science · doi:10.1093/ps/83.6.925 · Cited by 409
Probiotics: the scientific basis
Hill, M. (1993) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.34.6.863-c · Cited by 404
Cited by
Intestinal microbiota associated with differential feed conversion efficiency in chickens
Stanley, D., Denman, S. E., Hughes, R. J., Geier, M. S., Crowley, T. M., Chen, H., Haring, V. R., & Moore, R. J. (2012) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-011-3847-5 · Cited by 312
Awais, M. M., Jamal, M. A., Akhtar, M., Hameed, M. R., Anwar, M. I., & Ullah, M. I. (2019) · Microbial Pathogenesis · doi:10.1016/j.micpath.2018.10.038 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Williams, R. B.
- Venue
- Avian Pathology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-06
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 159-180
- ISSN
- 0307-9457 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-3338
- OpenAlex
- W2051656062
- Cited by
- 527
- References
- 55
- FWCI
- 16.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intercurrent coccidiosis and necrotic enteritis of chickens: rational, integrated disease management by maintenance of gut integrity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/03079450500112195
- The paper
- Williams, R. B. (2005). Intercurrent coccidiosis and necrotic enteritis of chickens: rational, integrated disease management by maintenance of gut integrity. Avian Pathology. https://doi.org/10.1080/03079450500112195
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.